 |

|
 |
EMPLOYMENT NEWS, MARCH 2011

Christchurch Earthquake
Almost everyone in New Zealand has family,
friends, or associates affected by the devastating earthquake in
Christchurch, and our thoughts are with everyone who has been
affected.
Once the immediate emergency has passed, many
people will be turning their minds to their work in Christchurch and
questions like is there still a job for me to go to? What if I can’t
make it to my place of work? Will my employer still be able to pay
me, even though the business is closed? will need to be answered.
Health and Safety The disaster raises
many employment law issues. First and foremost must be health and safety.
Very simply, if a workplace is not safe to work in, employees cannot be
required to work there, and must not do so. It is imperative that
everyone follow the instructions and advice of Civil Defence staff,
Police, and City officials.
An employee can also refuse to work
on health and safety grounds if he or she has reasonable grounds to
believe that there is an imminent risk of serious harm. Many
businesses, especially in the CBD, will be closed for quite some time,
and in some cases may not reopen. So what happens to the employment
relationship? Force majeure
The first port of call is, as always, the employment agreement. Following
September’s earthquake, we suspect that force majeure clauses will be
slightly more common. Such clauses may state that the employer can stop
paying the employee where the business has been shut down due to an ‘Act
of God’. What if employees are willing and able
to work, but the business is closed? Subject to
the employment agreement, the usual rule of thumb is that where an
employee is ready and willing to work, the employer is obliged to provide
the work and pay the employee. However, generally speaking, and unless
the employment is frustrated, if the employer is unable to provide work
for the employee, the obligation to pay wages remains. The government
Earthquake Support Subsidy (explained in greater detail below) may assist
employers to meet their wage/salary obligations, at least in the short
term.
We would recommend that employers discuss with employees
whether it is possible for them to take annual holidays, leave without
pay, or a mixture of both, or to agree to a reduced pay rate for a period
of time. Employers can also require employees to take annual leave, by
giving 14 days notice.
If the employer’s business is not going to
be able to resume, employers could consider redundancies, or potentially
rely on the doctrine of frustration to end the employment relationship.
With regard to redundancies, we would recommend that employers do follow
(as far as possible) the ‘usual’ process of consulting with employees
about a proposal to make their positions redundant, although consultation
may take a slightly different form than that which would be carried out
in normal circumstances. Contractual entitlements to redundancy
compensation will still apply.
With regard to frustration (which
in short, is when it is impossible for the agreement to continue)this may
apply where a workplace has been completely destroyed, will not reopen,
and there is no other work for the employee within the business, or
potentially where the source of work has been destroyed – e.g. if the
sole client’s business was destroyed. Frustration essentially means that
the employment agreement is cancelled, and will require the employer to
notify the employee that this is the case.
In the recent past,
the Courts have been reluctant to accept frustration as a valid
termination of employment relationships, unless there is no other
alternative. We recommend that employers facing these issues take advice.
What if the business is open or there is work
for employees, but they are not turning up? If
work is still available for employees, but they are bereaved, sick,
injured, or caring for dependants who are sick or injured, they will most
likely be entitled to take sick or bereavement leave. Most employers will
take a generous approach to entitlements in this case, and are probably
unlikely to require proof. Other employees may be unable to come to work
due to accommodation problems, transport issues, or the need to care for
children while schools and child care facilities are closed. It is
important that employers and employees keep in touch with each other, and
communicate in good faith about what leave may be taken, and how that
will be remunerated.
We know that a number of Christchurch
residents are displaced, or have simply left the city, to stay with
friends and family, or in holiday homes outside of the region. If an
employee does not turn up for work, and cannot be contacted, it may be
that they have legally abandoned their employment. Employers should
definitely not jump to this conclusion however, and it is important to
make every attempt to contact the employee, and discuss the reasons for
their absence before moving to terminate for abandonment. An employer
faced with a situation where an employee does not turn up to work or
cannot be contacted, needs to consider the very sad possibility that they
have been killed or are listed as missing. Even in the best of times, the
Courts place a strong onus on the employer to prove that an employee has
in fact intended to abandon their employment. During a state of national
emergency, such as we are now facing, it seems likely that Courts would
not show a great deal of sympathy toward employers who acted hastily or
prematurely in declaring employees to have abandoned their employment.
Government support
The Government has announced an emergency employment
support package as a first step toward supporting those financially
impacted by the earthquake. There are two types of support: Earthquake
Support Subsidy, and Earthquake Job Loss Cover.
Earthquake
Support Subsidy is a payment for employers to assist them to pay
their employees while they deal with the impact of the earthquake. The
subsidy is also available to the self employed or business owners who
draw a wage. The payment assists employers when they are unable to
operate either due to damage, a cordon, or an essential service is not
available, or where they can operate but are experiencing significant
loss of trade. This subsidy is for employees who still have a job, while
the employer works out what they are going to do.
The payment
will be made directly to the employer who will then pay the employee. The
wage subsidy:
-
Will be paid for up to six weeks from 22
February 2011 with a review after three weeks;
-
Will be paid at a rate of $500 per week per
fulltime employee (over 20 hours per week) or a rate of $300 per week
per employee for part time employees (defined as anyone working 20
hours a week or less); and
-
Is not subject to GST but is subject to PAYE.
Earthquake Job Loss Cover is for those
who have lost their job as a result of the earthquake. If an employee is
unable to contact the employer, and is not working or being paid, then
the employee may apply for the Earthquake Job Loss Cover payments, which
are made directly to the employee.
The payment is:
To qualify, an employee must:
-
have been employed on 22 February 2011;
-
have worked for an employer who was based in
the Christchurch City Council area; and
-
no longer have an employer (i.e. the employer
has decided not to operate)
An employee cannot get the Earthquake Job Loss Cover
payment if the employer is getting the Earthquake Support Subsidy for
that employee.
In our view: The key
for employers and employees navigating through this crisis is
communication in good faith. Keeping in touch with each other, and
providing regular updates on such matters as access to the workplace,
safety status of the workplace, availability of, and for, work, and
employees’ state of health will hopefully help the working relationship
to continue in some form. Communication itself may present a
challenge – even if we assume that both employer and employee have
working phones, it may be that contact details are lost, or, as we have
mentioned above, that employees have moved or been displaced from the
area. Employees may not have internet connections available, or even
power, in some cases. As with so many things in Christchurch at the
moment, some lateral thinking may be required to figure out effective
communication channels.
We strongly urge that employers use caution in making
any ‘big decisions’ with regard to employment. In particular, assuming
that employees have abandoned their employment, or making the decision to
otherwise terminate employment, should only be made after proper
consideration, and taking advice.
It is likely that both parties will need to compromise
on their strict legal entitlements, and flexibility on both sides is
going to be extremely important. Where the business will not be able to
reopen, again, communication will be key.


|
 |
 |