3.05.2018

PPSA Pointer – Update Debtor’s Name Change or Lose Priority

For a secured party to retain the priority of their registration on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR), they must keep their financing statement up to date with all the information that they are aware of, including a change of the debtor’s name.

The effectiveness of the Personal Property Securities Act 1999 (“PPSA“) depends upon people being able to search the PPSR to determine whether personal property owned by a particular person or organisation may be subject to a security interest. It is particularly important for a secured party to record any changes of a debtor’s name, given that this is one of the main ways to search on the PPSR.

Accordingly, the PPSA provides that where a secured party with a perfected security interest gains knowledge that the debtor has changed its name (including as a result of a company amalgamation), the secured party has 15 days to act in order to maintain its priority.

If the secured party fails to take possession of the collateral or to register a financing change statement recording the change of the debtor’s name within 15 days after gaining knowledge of the debtor’s name change, the secured party’s interest will be subordinated to:

  • an interest (i.e. any non-security interest such as the interest of a buyer or lessee) in the collateral arising in the period commencing 15 days after the secured party gained the requisite knowledge and concluding when the secured party either files a financing change statement to record the new debtor name or takes possession of the collateral;
  • a perfected security interest in the collateral that is registered or perfected in the period referred to above; and
  • a perfected security interest in the collateral that is registered or perfected in the first 15 days after the secured party gained the requisite knowledge if the secured party does not file a financing change statement to record the new debtor name or take possession of the collateral before the expiration of that 15 day period.

In effect, a secured creditor which obtains knowledge of the change of a debtor’s name has 15 days to act to protect itself and preserve its priority position by either taking possession of the collateral or filing a financing change statement to record the debtor’s new name. Failure to do so will mean that the secured party’s priority will be lost to competing interests.

Practically speaking, if your business becomes aware that a customer has changed its name (i.e. if a customer asks you to change the name that invoices are addressed to), you should have a system in place to ensure that the PPSR registration is also updated within 15 days in order to maintain the priority of your registration.

 

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

A trust on a trust – how strange is that?
In New Zealand we are trust crazy and owning a home in trust is common place. For many, just as for Mr Hodgkinson in Judd v Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited [2016] NZCA 397, the trust has been set u...
21.10.2019 Posted in Trust Wills Estates
M&A Update – Warranty & Indemnity Insurance
This year we have seen strong private M&A activity and the use of warranty and indemnity (“W&I”) insurance in a number of transactions. W&I insurance is a specialist insurance product ...
18.10.2019 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law & Insurance Law
Ending Employment – Process is Key!
Even when employment has lasted for a very short time, an employer is still required to follow the law, and the consequences of failing to comply can end up being very significant.  So it was for a C...
26.09.2019 Posted in Employment Law
New Era for International Dispute Resolution?
A common issue for New Zealand companies engaging in international trade and dealing with foreign counterparties is how and where to resolve disputes and ensuring payment is received when the dispute ...
Court of Appeal considers the law on notice during a Trial Period… are we all clear now?
In Ioan v Scott Technology NZ Limited, the Employment Court looked at the requirement to give notice during a trial period termination under the Employment Relations Act 2000 (Act). Mr Ioan’s employ...
04.09.2019 Posted in Employment Law
Getting the Deal Through: Shipping
Getting the Deal Through works with many of the best lawyers and law firms in the world
03.09.2019 Posted in Maritime Law & Trade and Commodities
Could a Health and Safety Breach Mean Jail Time?
In August 2019, a United Kingdom judgment imposed a custodial sentence on a site supervisor who was involved in breaches of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (UK Act) that caused the death of a w...
28.08.2019 Posted in Health & Safety Law
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.