9.05.2018

Selling your home when it is owned by a Family Trust

Why you need to make sure all trustees are consulted and in agreement before you sign an agreement to sell your home.

Why you need to make sure all trustees are consulted and in agreement before you sign an agreement to sell your home.

The High Court has delivered two separate decisions within the last five months on the issue of whether a sale and purchase agreement is binding if the vendor is a trust and only some of the trustees have signed the agreement.  In short, can a trust commit to the sale of trust property without the unanimous consent of all the trustees?

WT Trustee Company Ltd v Cato and Ors[1]

This case concerned the sale of a couple’s home that was owned by their family trust.  The couple and a third independent trustee were the trustees of the family trust and were recorded as the registered proprietors of the property.  The property was listed for sale with a real estate agent with the agreement and knowledge of all three trustees.  Following the listing of the property, the couple and a purchaser signed an agreement for sale of the property.  The purchaser claimed he was told by the agent that the couple had authority to bind the independent trustee.  When the agreement was presented to the independent trustee for signing, he refused to sign the agreement on the basis that he considered that the offered price was lower than the market value of the property.

Dong v Sun[2]

In this case, a property was owned by a family trust with two trustees.  The trustees of the trust decided to put the property on the market.  The property was put to auction but did not sell.  Following the auction, the purchaser made an offer to purchase the property and paid the deposit to the real estate agent.  Satisfied with the price, one of the trustees accepted the offer without any consultation with the second trustee, who had no knowledge of the price offered by the purchaser or that the agreement had been signed by the first trustee.  The second trustee made it clear that not only did she not agree to sell the property at the offered price to the purchaser, she was not even aware of the negotiations that had preceded the agreement being signed by the first trustee.  The second trustee refused to sign the agreement and ultimately both trustees subsequently sold the property to a related party.

Decision

In both cases, the Court began by noting that as a general rule, all registered proprietors of a property were required to sign an agreement for the sale of the property before there was a binding agreement in place between the vendor and purchaser.  The Court confirmed that an agreement will only come into existence when all co-owners have signed the agreement.  In cases of a trust, this means that each trustee is required to execute the agreement in order for it to be valid and binding unless there is power to the contrary conferred by the trust deed or a power of attorney under section 31 of the Trustee Act 1956.

Conclusion

When acting as a trustee of a family trust, it is important to remember that each trustee is obliged to consider the best interests of the trust before signing an agreement to sell trust assets.  The above cases make it clear that where a trust is a party to a sale and purchase agreement, then in the absence of power to the contrary being conferred by the trust deed or a power of attorney pursuant to section 31 of the Trustee Act 1956, all trustees must sign the agreement in order for there to be a binding contract.

If your home is owned by a family trust, you need ensure that all the trustees, including any independent trustees, are fully consulted and in agreement with any proposal to sell the home.  Never assume that the independent trustee will blindly affirm any decision made by the rest of the trustees.


[1] WT Trustee Company Limited v Cato & Ors [2014] NZHC 1084
[2] Xiaojie Dong v Changmin Sun & Rongjun Zhang & Yanming Wang Wang & Rongfang Zhang [2014] NZHC 208
Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

4 million reasons for a tailored Shareholders’ Agreement: Dold v Murphy
The Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Dold v Murphy highlights the importance of having an appropriate Shareholders’ Agreement in place.
21.10.2020 Posted in Business Advice & Company Law
Things to know before starting a lending business in New Zealand
Things to know before starting a lending business in New Zealand
09.10.2020 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
Hesketh Henry announces new managing partner
We are very pleased to announce the appointment of Christina Bryant as our new managing partner.
09.10.2020
Supreme Court forecast – storms ahead for directors
On 24 September 2020, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in the case of Debut Homes Ltd (In Liquidation) v Cooper [2020] NZSC 100.
Is this Organic? Proposed Regulation of Organic Product Claims
The Organic Products Bill, which is currently at the Select Committee stage, proposes to introduce a regime to regulate claims made by businesses that products are organic (known as making an “organ...
06.10.2020 Posted in Business Advice
Government calls time on Dodds litigation
Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited v Dodds [2020] NZCA 395
Privacy Act 2020: new obligations to report privacy breaches
The Privacy Act 2020 creates a new requirement to report serious privacy breaches, as from 1 December 2020. 
25.09.2020 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law & Regulatory
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->