9.05.2018

Selling your home when it is owned by a Family Trust

Why you need to make sure all trustees are consulted and in agreement before you sign an agreement to sell your home.

Why you need to make sure all trustees are consulted and in agreement before you sign an agreement to sell your home.

The High Court has delivered two separate decisions within the last five months on the issue of whether a sale and purchase agreement is binding if the vendor is a trust and only some of the trustees have signed the agreement.  In short, can a trust commit to the sale of trust property without the unanimous consent of all the trustees?

WT Trustee Company Ltd v Cato and Ors[1]

This case concerned the sale of a couple’s home that was owned by their family trust.  The couple and a third independent trustee were the trustees of the family trust and were recorded as the registered proprietors of the property.  The property was listed for sale with a real estate agent with the agreement and knowledge of all three trustees.  Following the listing of the property, the couple and a purchaser signed an agreement for sale of the property.  The purchaser claimed he was told by the agent that the couple had authority to bind the independent trustee.  When the agreement was presented to the independent trustee for signing, he refused to sign the agreement on the basis that he considered that the offered price was lower than the market value of the property.

Dong v Sun[2]

In this case, a property was owned by a family trust with two trustees.  The trustees of the trust decided to put the property on the market.  The property was put to auction but did not sell.  Following the auction, the purchaser made an offer to purchase the property and paid the deposit to the real estate agent.  Satisfied with the price, one of the trustees accepted the offer without any consultation with the second trustee, who had no knowledge of the price offered by the purchaser or that the agreement had been signed by the first trustee.  The second trustee made it clear that not only did she not agree to sell the property at the offered price to the purchaser, she was not even aware of the negotiations that had preceded the agreement being signed by the first trustee.  The second trustee refused to sign the agreement and ultimately both trustees subsequently sold the property to a related party.

Decision

In both cases, the Court began by noting that as a general rule, all registered proprietors of a property were required to sign an agreement for the sale of the property before there was a binding agreement in place between the vendor and purchaser.  The Court confirmed that an agreement will only come into existence when all co-owners have signed the agreement.  In cases of a trust, this means that each trustee is required to execute the agreement in order for it to be valid and binding unless there is power to the contrary conferred by the trust deed or a power of attorney under section 31 of the Trustee Act 1956.

Conclusion

When acting as a trustee of a family trust, it is important to remember that each trustee is obliged to consider the best interests of the trust before signing an agreement to sell trust assets.  The above cases make it clear that where a trust is a party to a sale and purchase agreement, then in the absence of power to the contrary being conferred by the trust deed or a power of attorney pursuant to section 31 of the Trustee Act 1956, all trustees must sign the agreement in order for there to be a binding contract.

If your home is owned by a family trust, you need ensure that all the trustees, including any independent trustees, are fully consulted and in agreement with any proposal to sell the home.  Never assume that the independent trustee will blindly affirm any decision made by the rest of the trustees.


[1] WT Trustee Company Limited v Cato & Ors [2014] NZHC 1084
[2] Xiaojie Dong v Changmin Sun & Rongjun Zhang & Yanming Wang Wang & Rongfang Zhang [2014] NZHC 208
Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Bereavement Leave Confirmed for Miscarriages and Stillbirths 
New Zealand has become the second country in the world to pass legislation that provides bereavement leave for mothers and their partners after a miscarriage or stillbirth.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Court of Appeal Overturns Employment Court’s Decision in Tourism Holdings
Tourism Holdings Limited v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Tourism Holdings) is the first decision in which the Employment Court considered section 8(2) of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act). The Court of Appeal has recently overturned this decision.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Guarantees must be in writing and signed to be enforceable
For a guarantee to be enforceable, the requirements set out in section 27 of the Property Law Act 2007 (Act) must be strictly complied with.  This is what the NZSC held in Brougham v Regan. The key i...
19.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice
UK Supreme Court Delivers Decision on Uber Driver Employment Status
The distinction between employee and independent contractor can be complex, particularly where the nature of the business model blurs the lines of standard employment practices.
16.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Holidays Act Overhaul – Taskforce Recommendations
There have been calls for an amendment of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act) for some time.
16.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Unwanted Land Covenants and Easements: Seeking a Court Order
The Supreme Court recently considered an application by Synlait Milk to modify a land covenant restricting the burdened land use to farming, grazing and forestry operation to protect the ability of the benefited land owner to develop a quarry.  This article looks at the circumstances in which the courts might give relief to parties in an application to extinguish or modify a covenant or easement.
15.03.2021 Posted in Property Law
New ICC Arbitration Rules 2021 come into force
The revised International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules for 2021 (2021 Rules) have now come into force and apply to all ICC arbitrations begun after 1 January 2021.  While the new Rules...
10.03.2021 Posted in Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->