9.07.2019

Improvements to the overseas investment regime could be on their way…

Certain features of the Overseas Investment Act 2005 (“Act“) that have caused frustration in the past could be set to change. The Act is currently in the midst of a two stage review.  The first stage, completed last year, saw the introduction of residential homes being caught by the provisions of the Act, as well as a range of other changes such as a simplified process being introduced for some forestry transactions.

The second stage, which is now underway, was kicked off by the Government issuing a Consultation Document, which sets out a number of proposals for further reform of the Act. 

This stage of the review focuses on three areas:

What is screened – A review of the types of sensitive assets and the type of interests being acquired.  Specifically, this includes reviewing land that is considered sensitive only because of what it is next to.  People are often surprised to hear that they are caught by the Act when there is an overseas investment in a piece of land (or a company which has an interest in some land) in an industrial area, but it happens to be next to a reserve.  The proposed changes include amending the types of ‘adjoining land’ that make a piece of land sensitive.  Importantly, the proposed changes include the possibility of removing recreational reserves from the definition of land that makes an adjoining piece sensitive.  People are often even more surprised to find that the Act applies even if the interest that is being acquired is only a lease with a term of more than 3 years.  Another possible change being considered is increasing the term of a lease to 10 years before it is caught by the Act.  In our view, these proposed changes would make the regime less cumbersome and are likely to be welcomed by foreign investors.

Who is screened and when – This includes reviewing the current definition of ‘overseas person’ and the extent to which small transactions or changes in shareholdings of an overseas person that has no control over the sensitive assets will be caught by the Act.  Specific areas of review include ‘tipping point’ for requiring consent.  Currently, for example, any increase in shareholding of an overseas person who holds 25% or more of the shares of a company which owns sensitive land would be subject to consent, even if the change did not result in the overseas shareholder having more control over the asset.  Also, the requirement for consent can be triggered inadvertently in a number of ways including, for example where an overseas person’s shareholding increases when other shareholders participate in a share buy back.  In our experience, one of the difficulties faced in respect of these types of transactions being caught by the Act is that it is difficult for investors to show the benefits to New Zealand that will be created from the transaction, when often the intention is just for business to continue as usual. 

How screening is done – This part of the review looks to consider improvements on the screening progress.  This review is broken up into two parts. The first considers assessing investors’ character and capacity and looks at simplifying the investor test.  The second looks at screening impacts on investments and options to amend the tests that are used to establish whether an investment will benefit New Zealand. Proposals include a new “national interest test” which would provide a greater discretion to Ministers to decline an application.  The “special land” provisions, which require certain land to be offered back to the Crown, and the requirements relating to farmland advertising, are also being reviewed. 

Overall, the intention of the review and the proposals appear promising.  Treasury is currently in the process of analysing submissions made in response to the consultation document.  Following which, we may see some further reform to New Zealand’s overseas investment regime.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Government calls time on Dodds litigation
Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited v Dodds [2020] NZCA 395
Privacy Act 2020: new obligations to report privacy breaches
The Privacy Act 2020 creates a new requirement to report serious privacy breaches, as from 1 December 2020. 
25.09.2020 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law & Regulatory
Entitlement to Indemnity under Marine Transit Insurance
The decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Swashplate Pty Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company trading as Liberty International Underwriters addresses the issue of when risk attaches pur...
Singapore Convention comes into force
The Singapore Mediation Convention has now entered into force, creating a comprehensive framework for the enforcement of international mediation settlement agreements.
Salisbury Street Victory
On 10 September 2020, Osborne J delivered the long-awaited judgment in Body Corporate 335089 v Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd and Body Corporate 341154 v Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd.[1]  The judg...
16.09.2020 Posted in Insurance Law
The City’s Breaking and Everybody’s Shaking
Climate change and its effect on contract risk in the construction industry
14.09.2020 Posted in Construction Law
Construction’s Insolvency Predicament: Cooper, Mainzeal and Reckless Trading
Insolvency events have become common place in the construction industry in recent years. In particular, a focus has been investigating whether directors allowed their insolvent company to engage in re...
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->