17.12.2015

JCS Cost Management Ltd v QBE Insurance (International) Ltd [2015] NZCA 524

This was an appeal from a summary judgment[1] dismissing a claim for civil liability cover under a professional indemnity policy on the basis the claim made against the insured was not in connection with his professional business practice.  It highlights the need for insureds to consider carefully the nature of the services they provide, and whether their policy covers all of their business activities.

Background

The proceeding arose out of litigation concerning the purchase of a leaky home.[2]  Mr Johnston, a director of JCS, a quantity surveying and project management company, attended an open home with a client in the hope of securing future project management work.  The client had indicated that if she purchased the property, she intended to carry out significant renovations.

Following the purchase, the client retained JCS and began the renovations.  Weathertightness issues were identified.  The client and her husband sued Auckland Council, which joined Mr Johnston as a third party.  The Council alleged that the purchasers bought the house in reliance on pre-purchase advice given by Mr Johnston as a “building appraiser”.  The Council’s claim failed on the facts.

Mr Johnston incurred costs defending the Council’s claim which exceeded the costs award.  He brought a claim against QBE to recover the difference in costs under his professional indemnity insurance policy, plus compensation for damage to JCS’s business and general damages.  QBE rejected the claim and sought summary judgment, on the basis that the Council’s claim was not connected to JCS’s project management business.  The High Court found in favour of QBE.

Cover under the insurance policy

The insurance policy included two significant clauses:

  • QBE shall indemnify the Insured for any Valid Claim subject to the terms of this Policy.
  • In addition, QBE shall pay Costs and Expenses incurred with the written consent of QBE in the defence or settlement of any Valid Claim, up to the Limit of Indemnity or $1M, whichever is the lesser.

Both of the clauses contain the term “Valid Claim”, defined as a claim “alleging Civil Liability by any act, error, omission or conduct … in connection with the Insured’s Professional Business Practice”.  “Professional Business Practice” was defined as the Insured’s business of quantity surveyor and project manager.  “Project Manager” was further defined as “the provision of consultancy, certification or project coordination services for construction or development of projects where… those services are rendered for remuneration and the services fall within the insured’s Professional Business Practice”.

Mr Johnston was only entitled to defence costs under the policy if the claim made by the Council would – if successful – be a “Valid Claim”.  It was accepted that Mr Johnson attended the open home in connection with his business.  However the majority of the Court held that a Valid Claim required a causal connection between Mr Johnston’s notional liability for the pre-purchase advice (“the act, error, omission or conduct”) and the Professional Business Practice covered by the policy.  “Professional Business Practice” was narrowly defined: it only covered consultancy services for construction or development projects where the services were rendered for remuneration.  Free advice given during a marketing exercise for a prospective project did not fall within this definition.

The majority accordingly held that the Council’s claim against Mr Johnston was not a Valid Claim and dismissed the appeal against summary judgment.  The minority judge, Miller J, took the view that the word “by” could encompass a meaning wider than a direct causal link, and would have left the interpretation of the policy to be determined at trial.

 Back to Summary Table

[1] QBE Insurance (International) Ltd v Wild South Holdings Ltd [2014] NZHC 2718

[2] Johnson v Auckland Council [2013] NZHC 165; Johnson v Auckland Council [2013] NZCA 662.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Watch this space – proposed update to key construction contract AS 4000-1997
Hot on the heels of the review of NZS3910, AS 4000-1997, a key Australian standard form construction contract for more than 27 years, is currently being reviewed.  This form, or variants of it, is so...
17.06.2024 Posted in Construction
What to expect from payment disputes under construction contracts in 2024: a return to orthodoxy
Following the departure from the fundamental principle of the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (CCA) “pay now argue later” in South Pacific Industrial Ltd v Demasol Ltd [2021] NZHC 3597, the Court ...
14.06.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Complexities of contract termination – High Court calls halt on the Contractor’s process in Rau Paenga v CPB
The High Court in Rau Paenga Ltd v CPB Contractors Pty Ltd [2023] NZHC 2947 granted an interim injunction preventing the Contractor from suspending and terminating its contract for the construction of...
30.05.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
iStock  Employment Concept
Court of Appeal overturns Employment Court decision stripping family carers of their employment status
Two parents of disabled adult children have lost their status as employees of the Ministry of Health (MOH). The Employment Court had previously found that they were “homeworkers” and therefore emp...
29.05.2024 Posted in Employment
vadim kaipov  kIqhmxc unsplash med
Is working from home still working?
There are conflicting views on whether working from home is effective. Research conducted by Massey University at the end of 2023 found that around 40% of workers were doing hybrid work. This was an i...
23.05.2024 Posted in Employment
The Legal500 Construction Comparative Guide
The Construction team at Hesketh Henry is the exclusive New Zealand contributor to The Legal 500: Country Comparative Guide for Construction.  Partners Glen Holm-Hansen and Helen Macfarlane along wit...
21.05.2024 Posted in Construction
Government trumps Member’s Bill with the Contracts of Insurance Bill 2024
It now seems there is at least the possibility 2024 will be the year New Zealand finally sees the reform of insurance law with the Government’s own bill, the Contracts of Insurance Bill, now before ...
16.05.2024 Posted in Insurance
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.