12.05.2023

Australia’s immigration announcement may have tax consequences for New Zealander’s living in Australia

In April, the Australian Government announced a direct pathway to citizenship for New Zealand citizens who live in Australia for four years or more and meet certain requirements.  While the announcement is welcomed for many reasons, the tax consequences remain unclear. 

Since 26 February 2001, New Zealand citizens living in Australia have held a ‘non-protected’ Special Category Visas (SCV) and been treated as temporary residents.  Temporary residents have a favourable Australian tax status in that they are only taxed on Australian sourced income.

Once a temporary resident becomes a permanent resident or Australian citizen, foreign income is exposed to Australian tax consequences.  Having a spouse who is an Australian permanent resident or citizen may also expose a temporary resident’s foreign income to Australian tax consequences.

Prior to 26 February 2001, New Zealand citizens living in Australia held protected SCV and were eligible for Australia’s social security system. Protected SCV holders are not considered temporary residents and are therefore taxed in Australia on worldwide income.  

With effect from 1 July 2023, all New Zealand citizens holding an SCV will be considered permanent residents for citizenship purposes.  What is unclear from the initial announcement is whether they will remain temporary residents for tax purposes.  

From a New Zealand trust perspective, generally an Australian resident beneficiary (who is not a temporary resident) must pay income tax in Australia on all distributions received from a foreign trust.  It may be possible for trustees to stream corpus (original trust settlements) to the Australian resident beneficiary free of tax, but the corpus must be easily identifiable and tracked.  Tracking corpus is not something many New Zealand trusts do as it is not necessary from a New Zealand tax perspective.  A resettlement can be appropriate in some circumstances to identify and increase corpus.

If you have any questions about what actions a New Zealander living in Australia as a temporary resident, particularly those with trust structures in New Zealand, should take prior to 1 July 2023, Hesketh Henry would be happy to work with Australian advisers to clarify your position and any necessary trust changes.     

Disclaimer: We do not provide tax advice.  However, we regularly interact with clients and their specialist New Zealand and Australian tax advisers on private wealth matters.  The information contained in this article is based on our working knowledge, is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice. Specific legal and tax advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Are trustees bound to relationship property agreements?
In Rawson v Prescott [2024] NZHC 1919, the High Court addressed a dispute involving trust property and a relationship property agreement. Mr RR, trustee of the GR Family Trust, sought summary judgment...
10.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
shutterstock
Bowen case part 1 – blowing the whistle
You may have heard of the term ‘whistleblowing’, but have you heard of ‘protected disclosures’? Protected disclosures are a creature of the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers)...
10.09.2024 Posted in Employment
Construction theme black and white
Contractors take note – are any of your retentions clauses prohibited provisions?
In Stevensons Structural Engineers 1978 Ltd (in liq) v McMillan & Lockwood (PN) Ltd & Anor [2024] NZHC 2415, the High Court held that the timing for payment out of retentions in certain subcon...
05.09.2024 Posted in Construction
Avoiding the Grey Area: Interpreting Trust Beneficiary Classes
Beneficiary classes in trust deeds should be clearly defined to ensure the assets of the trust benefit the people who the settlor(s) of the trust originally intended.   If they are not, then disputes...
05.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
vecteezy square wooden blocks lined up on a wooden workbench  Insurance Icons centered
Hesketh Henry’s Insurance Team author LexisNexis Practical Guidance Insurance
Hesketh Henry’s Insurance Team is delighted to celebrate the launch of Practical Guidance Insurance. LexisNexis has launched Practical Guidance Insurance containing 12 topics and over 50 sub-topics ...
03.09.2024 Posted in Insurance
Contract dictionary
Is ‘close enough’ OK? Reasonable endeavours to overcome a force majeure event
The English Supreme Court’s decision in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV [2024] UKSC 18 has demonstrated the effect sanctions may have on a contract as a force majeure event and clarified the parameters of...
03.09.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
The useful Mackay v Dick principle is part of English law – might it apply here?
The useful Mackay v Dick principle is part of English law – might it apply here? In King Crude Carriers S.A. & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors, the English and Wales Court of Appeal confi...
03.09.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.