09.06.2023

Breaking News: Timeframe to raise a personal grievance for sexual harassment set to increase to 12 months

The timeframe to raise a personal grievance for sexual harassment is about to increase from 90 days to 12 months.

This change will come about as a result of the Employment Relations (Extended Time for Personal Grievance for Sexual Harassment) Amendment Bill, which passed its third reading on Wednesday, 7 June 2023.  This means that the Bill has now passed all of the hurdles in the parliamentary process and awaits Royal Assent, which is expected to be given any day now.

This is quite a significant change from the status quo, with the timeframe to raise a personal grievance previously being limited to 90 days, irrespective of the basis for the personal grievance.

The rationale is to allow victims of sexual harassment more time to consider whether they want to bring a personal grievance, thereby improving the process for victims.

What do employers need to do?

Once the Bill is given Royal Assent, it will have practical implications for employers.

New employment agreements will need to specifically reference the 12 months within which an employee can raise a personal grievance for sexual harassment.  This is in addition to the requirement to specify 90 days for other types of personal grievances.  Here, new employment agreements are those that are entered into on or after the date of commencement, which will be the day after the Bill receives Royal Assent.

It is important to note that this requirement will apply irrespective of when bargaining or negotiations in respect of an employment agreement started, even where talks began before the commencement date.

Employers could face a monetary penalty for failure to include reference to the 12-month period and the 90-day period in new employment agreements. 

What about current employment agreements?

Employers do not need to update current employment agreements.  A recent Supplementary Order Paper removed any requirement to amend current employment agreements.  However, employers might want to review their relevant workplace policies, to ensure that those policies are up to date.

If you have any questions about the new 12-month timeframe to raise a personal grievance for sexual harassment or have any questions about reviewing workplace policies, please get in touch with our Employment Law Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Are trustees bound to relationship property agreements?
In Rawson v Prescott [2024] NZHC 1919, the High Court addressed a dispute involving trust property and a relationship property agreement. Mr RR, trustee of the GR Family Trust, sought summary judgment...
10.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
shutterstock
Bowen case part 1 – blowing the whistle
You may have heard of the term ‘whistleblowing’, but have you heard of ‘protected disclosures’? Protected disclosures are a creature of the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers)...
10.09.2024 Posted in Employment
Construction theme black and white
Contractors take note – are any of your retentions clauses prohibited provisions?
In Stevensons Structural Engineers 1978 Ltd (in liq) v McMillan & Lockwood (PN) Ltd & Anor [2024] NZHC 2415, the High Court held that the timing for payment out of retentions in certain subcon...
05.09.2024 Posted in Construction
Avoiding the Grey Area: Interpreting Trust Beneficiary Classes
Beneficiary classes in trust deeds should be clearly defined to ensure the assets of the trust benefit the people who the settlor(s) of the trust originally intended.   If they are not, then disputes...
05.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
vecteezy square wooden blocks lined up on a wooden workbench  Insurance Icons centered
Hesketh Henry’s Insurance Team author LexisNexis Practical Guidance Insurance
Hesketh Henry’s Insurance Team is delighted to celebrate the launch of Practical Guidance Insurance. LexisNexis has launched Practical Guidance Insurance containing 12 topics and over 50 sub-topics ...
03.09.2024 Posted in Insurance
Contract dictionary
Is ‘close enough’ OK? Reasonable endeavours to overcome a force majeure event
The English Supreme Court’s decision in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV [2024] UKSC 18 has demonstrated the effect sanctions may have on a contract as a force majeure event and clarified the parameters of...
03.09.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
The useful Mackay v Dick principle is part of English law – might it apply here?
The useful Mackay v Dick principle is part of English law – might it apply here? In King Crude Carriers S.A. & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors, the English and Wales Court of Appeal confi...
03.09.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.