09.06.2023

Breaking News: Timeframe to raise a personal grievance for sexual harassment set to increase to 12 months

The timeframe to raise a personal grievance for sexual harassment is about to increase from 90 days to 12 months.

This change will come about as a result of the Employment Relations (Extended Time for Personal Grievance for Sexual Harassment) Amendment Bill, which passed its third reading on Wednesday, 7 June 2023.  This means that the Bill has now passed all of the hurdles in the parliamentary process and awaits Royal Assent, which is expected to be given any day now.

This is quite a significant change from the status quo, with the timeframe to raise a personal grievance previously being limited to 90 days, irrespective of the basis for the personal grievance.

The rationale is to allow victims of sexual harassment more time to consider whether they want to bring a personal grievance, thereby improving the process for victims.

What do employers need to do?

Once the Bill is given Royal Assent, it will have practical implications for employers.

New employment agreements will need to specifically reference the 12 months within which an employee can raise a personal grievance for sexual harassment.  This is in addition to the requirement to specify 90 days for other types of personal grievances.  Here, new employment agreements are those that are entered into on or after the date of commencement, which will be the day after the Bill receives Royal Assent.

It is important to note that this requirement will apply irrespective of when bargaining or negotiations in respect of an employment agreement started, even where talks began before the commencement date.

Employers could face a monetary penalty for failure to include reference to the 12-month period and the 90-day period in new employment agreements. 

What about current employment agreements?

Employers do not need to update current employment agreements.  A recent Supplementary Order Paper removed any requirement to amend current employment agreements.  However, employers might want to review their relevant workplace policies, to ensure that those policies are up to date.

If you have any questions about the new 12-month timeframe to raise a personal grievance for sexual harassment or have any questions about reviewing workplace policies, please get in touch with our Employment Law Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

UK Court of Appeal rules that that courts can order parties to engage in ADR: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416
The England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) has held that in certain circumstances, the courts can order parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or stay proceedings to allow the par...
24.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Health and Safety Tiles
Updated Guidance: IOD and WorkSafe release ‘Health and Safety Governance – A Good Practice Guide’
While we wait with bated breath for the outcome in the prosecution of former Ports of Auckland CEO, Tony Gibson, officers’ duties are very much at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Section 44 of t...
23.07.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.