03.12.2013

Christmas/Annual Closedown Periods

Employers are entitled to have a Christmas closedown – provided they customarily have had a closedown period.  Unfortunately, what constitutes “customarily” is somewhat unclear: an employer that has always closed down over Christmas will be fine, but what about, for example, a new (Greenfields) business wanting to close down at some point in its first year of operation?  Factually, such businesses can’t customarily have had a closedown period because they did not exist before.  Whether the Courts will allow a ‘start-up’ to have a closedown is unknown.

Where an employer has customarily had a closedown period, then they can continue that practice provided that:

  • They give employees at least 14 days notice of the closedown; and
  • Employees are informed that they will be required to take annual holidays during the closedown.

If an employer is going to have a closedown period, best practice is for them to tell employees in writing – a general memo about when the business will close and reopen and that employees will need to take annual holidays is acceptable.

If specific employees do not have sufficient holiday entitlements (which will include those within their first year of employment), then send them a personal letter.  These employees will be paid at 8% of their gross earnings to the date of commencement of the closedown and the employer may discontinue their work during the closedown period.

If an employer has not previously had a closedown period, then, under the Holidays Act 2003, they cannot decide to start the practice now.  However, the Holidays Act allows an employer and employee to agree to take annual holidays, or, if there is no agreement, an employer can direct an employee to take annual leave by giving at least 14 days notice (there may be greater notice or different provisions in an employment agreement).  Through that process, an employer could direct all employees to take their annual leave entitlement – creating a de facto closedown period.  However, an employer could not direct an employee who has no entitlement to annual leave to take leave in advance or leave without pay.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Plan fail results in health and safety conviction
Deliver the health and safety work you promise, or there may be legal consequences – as a health and safety consultancy recently learnt! Earlier this year, WorkSafe prosecuted Safe Business Solution...
25.10.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Contract stock edit e
Rent reviews
As a tenant or landlord under a commercial lease, your business will be affected by rent reviews during the life of your lease.  Therefore, it is essential that you understand the most common types o...
24.10.2024 Posted in Property
Serious misconduct – how serious does the conduct have to be?
What is serious misconduct, and when and how can an employer bring an employee’s employment to an end on these grounds?
23.10.2024 Posted in Employment
iStock  Construction dpi
“More than an opinion”: criminal liability arising from PS4 producer statements under the Building Act 2004
In Solicitor-General’s Reference (No 1 of 2022) from CRI-2021-463-55 ([2022] NZHC 556) [2024] NZCA 514 the Court of Appeal was asked to consider the following question: Was the Court correct to find...
15.10.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Close call on contribution: Beca decision confirms 10-year longstop does not bar contribution claims
In a 3-2 split decision, the Supreme Court in Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd v Wellington City Council [2024] NZSC 117 confirmed that contribution claims are not barred by the Building Act 2004...
11.10.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes & Insurance
Business man document
Addressing directors’ personal safety
The Companies Act 1993 (CA93) currently requires all company directors to make their residential addresses available as a matter of public record.  However, in recent times, incidents of stalking and...
Wielding the Secateurs: The High Court’s Pruning of Potentially Disruptive Decisions
Every now and then courts have to self-correct to prevent errant off-shoots of legal reasoning advancing into the law.  In the decision, IAG New Zealand Ltd v Degen [2024] NZHC 397, the High Court t...
19.09.2024 Posted in Insurance
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.