22.08.2024

Consultation underway on management of seismic risk of earthquake-prone buildings

Only a few days before the Wellington Girls College community learnt two levels of a building which had been extended in 1994 were just 15% of the new build standard (NBS), a bill to extend the deadline for remediating many earthquake-prone buildings had its first reading.

Earlier this year Cabinet agreed that remediation deadlines for earthquake-prone buildings that had not lapsed as at 2 April 2024 should be extended for four years.  The intention is to allow time for a review of the management of seismic risk in buildings (Review) to be completed and any subsequent reforms to be implemented.  The Government has expressed concern that New Zealand has over 5,000 earthquake-prone buildings and in many instances these buildings are not being remediated because complying with the regulations is proving too complex and too costly. 

Building (Earthquake-prone Building Deadlines and Other Matters) Amendment Bill

The Amendment Bill to give effect to the 4 year extension had its first reading on 8 August and is expected to be passed by the end of 2024.  Submissions close on Monday, 26 August 2024 and the Transport and Infrastructure Committee is intending to hear oral evidence on the Bill on Thursday, 29 August. 

What is the purpose of the Review?

The Review is now underway and a final report is expected to be published by mid-2025 after it has been considered by Cabinet.  

The purpose of the Review is to consider how well the current system for managing seismic risk in existing buildings is working, identify problems, assess a range of options, and provide recommended actions.  To achieve this purpose the Review will:

  • consider society’s expectations and willingness to pay to mitigate the risk of injury and death in an earthquake, and for improving the resilience of buildings over time;
  • recommend regulatory responses that balance life safety risks against the costs of regulation and impact on private property owners;
  • identify barriers to meeting regulatory requirements and the types of support or incentives that would help building owners to better manage seismic risk; and
  • consider how outcomes from seismic risk requirements align with broader Government objectives. (The Cabinet paper highlighted the Government’s priorities to grow the economy and to deliver more affordable housing.)

Who should be involved in the Review?

Feedback is being sought now from anyone wishing to make a comment on their experience with the current earthquake-prone building system and any ideas about future management of seismic risk in existing buildings.  A simple and short feedback form is available on MBIE’s website Earthquake Prone Buildings Feedback.  Respondents are grouped by building owners, building tenants, and industry/other which includes a tick box for building users and members of the public.  Quite simply, anyone with a view is invited to contribute and can then choose to be kept informed of updates.  It is clearly intended to be a quick way to become engaged in the consultation process.

Assessing and measuring seismic risk

The Review will also involve technical experts and external peer review for technical details.  The topics up for discussion include:

  • Possible alternatives to the percentage new building standard measure (%NBS).
  • Whether the age and construction method of buildings, their type of use, or the vulnerability of occupants mean different regulatory requirements should apply.
  • Beyond the risk to life safety, for what building use types (such as hospitals, schools and retirement facilities) does resilience need to be prioritised?
  • How should varying degrees of seismic hazard across New Zealand be reflected in different requirements in different areas?
  • To what extent should risk be managed by mandatory requirements? Or can risk be accepted through appropriate disclosure, or the action of non-regulatory drivers (such as insurer requirements)?
  • How should risk be understood in relation to users of buildings who are not the owners, such as residential or commercial tenants, retail customers and other visitors, users of adjacent buildings and pedestrians in the vicinity?
  • How important is it to ensure existing buildings are more resilient to damage?
  • Can insurance estimates of risk be treated as a proxy for risk in relation to the prospect of damage to buildings (i.e. in relation to building resilience, as distinct from risk to life)?
  • How will future changes in the availability of insurance in New Zealand impact the management of risk?

Timeline

Once the Government has identified the recommendations it accepts in the final report, there will be detailed development and assessment of the options to deliver those recommendations and a discussion document will be released for public consultation.  This stage of work is expected to run from mid-2025 to 2026.  The Government also wants any legislation which is required to implement the recommendations to be introduced and passed in 2026.

If you have any questions about earthquake-prone buildings and the current Review or the Amendment Bill, please get in touch with our Construction or Property Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Employment Relations Authority and Employment Court
In our last article, we introduced the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction by discussing mediation – specifically, what mediation is and what to expect. This article discusses ...
17.04.2025 Posted in Employment
You’ve Been Served: Navigating the Use of Statutory Demands
An Introduction to Statutory Demands: A statutory demand is a legal document that is issued by a creditor (Creditor) to a debtor company (Debtor) demanding payment of a debt that is due and owing.  T...
15.04.2025 Posted in Insolvency and Restructuring
iStock  Succession Plan medium
Passing the Torch: Priming your Family Business for a Succession
As the first in a series of articles looking at the generational wealth transition and its impacts on business succession in New Zealand, Ben Hickson (partner, Corporate & Commercial) and John Kir...
07.04.2025 Posted in Corporate & Commercial & Private Wealth
Deciding to Wind Up? Observations on winding-up a trust from a recent High Court case
A trust can be a hassle and expensive to maintain.  So, it is not unusual for clients to reflect on whether a trust should be maintained. When settlors, Bert and Diana Queenin, decided to wind up the...
24.03.2025 Posted in Private Wealth
Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Mediation
Navigating the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction can be tricky. This article aims to spell out the key considerations for those involved in or contemplating mediation, which is...
24.03.2025 Posted in Employment
empty wallet finance concept
Amendment to the Crimes Act 1961: Intentionally not paying employees their wages now deemed theft
An amendment to the Crimes Act 1961 (Crimes Act) – the Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill has been passed by Parliament and received Royal assent. It is now an enforceable provision of th...
14.03.2025 Posted in Employment
Time’s Up: Late Redelivery and the Assessment of Damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company
The English Commercial Court gave an instructive judgment on the assessment of damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company; an appeal brou...
11.03.2025 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.