03.04.2020

COVID-19: Business Finance Guarantee Scheme – loan applications now open

Businesses can now start applying to their banks for loans under the $6.25 billion Business Finance Guarantee Scheme (“BFGS”), set up to support small and medium-sized businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.  Details regarding applications can be found on your bank’s website.  Whilst there are some differences, the loans offered by the five major retail banks generally have the following key terms and eligibility criteria:

Key terms:

  • Available until 30 September 2020.
  • A facility limit of up to $500,000.
  • A maximum term of three years.
  • As with any other loan, the loan must be fully repaid, together with interest and fees.
  • The bank may require security.
  • The loan cannot be used to fund:
    • capital assets/projects other than ‘business as usual’ expenditure which does not exceed 5% of the principal amount of the loan;
    • dividends distributed, nor on-lending, outside the borrower’s guaranteeing group; and
    • the re-financing of facilities advanced before 16 March 2020.

Eligibility criteria:

  • Your business must:
    • be New Zealand-based and an existing customer of the bank;
    • have annual turnover between $250,000 and $80,000,000;
    • operate in an eligible sector – with property development, property investment and agriculture notable amongst the excluded sectors; and
    • have urgent need for liquidity or bridging financing caused by COVID-19 disruption.
  • Subject to limited exceptions, the loan will only be made after your business has fully drawn down on/exhausted its existing facilities.
  • Other terms and conditions and credit criteria apply.

Next Steps

If you have any questions about the BFGS Loan being offered to your business, please get in touch with our business advice team.

All of the latest Government information for businesses in relation to COVID-19 can be found on the business.govt.nz website: https://www.business.govt.nz/news/coronavirus-information-for-businesses/.  We suggest that this is reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that you have the most up to date information.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
My cross-lease neighbour wants me to consent to their extension. Can I refuse?
From time to time a cross-lease property owner may be asked by their cross-lease neighbour for their consent to specific matters, such as proposed structural alterations or additions to their neighbou...
25.06.2024 Posted in Property
Contract stock edit
I have a land covenant (or an easement) registered on my title that restricts the use of my land. Can I get this removed?
Where land is subject to covenants and easements, owners might find themselves in a position where they are unintentionally or unknowingly in breach of a covenant or easement or have purchased land th...
25.06.2024 Posted in Property
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.