4.03.2021

Demolishing the “I’m not a PCBU” defence

In WorkSafe New Zealand v Dong SH Auckland Limited [2020] NZHC 3368, the High Court considered the statutory concept of a Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking (PCBU). 

The facts of the prosecution were uncomplicated.  During the demolition of a residential property in December 2017, a wall fell onto a neighbouring property causing damage.  Asbestos was subsequently discovered in the demolished building materials.  Quick Earth Moving Limited had carried out the demolition. It was charged by WorkSafe, pleaded guilty and was fined $150,000.  WorkSafe laid 3 charges against Dong SH Auckland Limited, a project management consultancy, in respect of the incident. 

Dong SH denied liability saying that it was neither a project manager nor a head contractor for work undertaken at the residential property.  Dong SH said that it had merely acted as a facilitator between the property developer and Quick Earth Moving, with Dong SH’s director assisting the property developer on the basis of friendship.

The District Court held that WorkSafe had not proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed all charges. The District Court was not satisfied that Dong SH had been engaged in any role in respect of demolition work at the property, and as such it did not have duties under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA) in respect of that work.

WorkSafe appealed, arguing that a person who manages a demolition project for another as their friend is under the same obligations as someone who is not a friend.

The High Court agreed with WorkSafe.  It held that the issue for the District Court was not whether Dong SH had contractually agreed to manage or supervise the demolition. Instead, the question was whether Dong SH was actually managing or supervising the demolition, and was therefore a PCBU in relation to the demolition.  The matter was remitted back to the District Court for a new trial.

The simple point is that there is no requirement that a PCBU be contractually tied to the activity in question, for a duty to arise under HSWA.  If it were otherwise, a fundamental purpose of HSWA –that workers and others affected by work be afforded the highest level of protection against harm to their health, safety, and welfare from hazards and risks arising from work – could be frustrated or undermined.

If you have any questions about your health and safety obligations as a PCBU, please get in touch with our Health and Safety Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

 

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Force Majeure – Not A Get Out Of Jail Free Card
Woolworths Group Ltd v Twentieth Super Pace Nominees Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 344
17.06.2022 Posted in Trade and Transport
Payment Claims: Incorrect Due Date From Delayed Delivery
Nicholls Group Projects Ltd v Plan Design Build Homes Ltd
20.05.2022 Posted in Construction
Employment Court Deems Gloriavale Residents Employees
The definition of “employee” in the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA) can at times be tricky to navigate; recent cases involving builders, couriers, and uber drivers can attest to the issues tha...
18.05.2022 Posted in Employment
New proposals on modern slavery place higher responsibilities on NZ organisations
Over recent years, modern slavery has become a more prominent issue in New Zealand.
13.05.2022 Posted in Business Advice
Insurance Contracts Bill – submissions on exposure draft closing soon
As we reported in late February, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) is seeking submissions on the exposure draft Insurance Contracts Bill.  Submissions close on 4 May 2022. MB...
20.04.2022 Posted in Insurance
Matariki and Fair Pay Agreements
Matariki Te Pire mō te Hararei Tūmatanui o te Kāhui o Matariki (Te Kāhui o Matariki Public Holiday Bill) received Royal Assent yesterday, and the new Act comes into force today – 12 April 20...
12.04.2022 Posted in Employment
A Landmark Change? – Proposed reform of the occupational regulation of engineers
Engineers engage in building work that is critical to public safety. Despite this, few restrictions are placed on who can carry out and supervise complex and specialised projects that require high levels of professional judgement, skill and technical competence.
07.04.2022 Posted in Construction
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->