4.03.2021

Demolishing the “I’m not a PCBU” defence

In WorkSafe New Zealand v Dong SH Auckland Limited [2020] NZHC 3368, the High Court considered the statutory concept of a Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking (PCBU). 

The facts of the prosecution were uncomplicated.  During the demolition of a residential property in December 2017, a wall fell onto a neighbouring property causing damage.  Asbestos was subsequently discovered in the demolished building materials.  Quick Earth Moving Limited had carried out the demolition. It was charged by WorkSafe, pleaded guilty and was fined $150,000.  WorkSafe laid 3 charges against Dong SH Auckland Limited, a project management consultancy, in respect of the incident. 

Dong SH denied liability saying that it was neither a project manager nor a head contractor for work undertaken at the residential property.  Dong SH said that it had merely acted as a facilitator between the property developer and Quick Earth Moving, with Dong SH’s director assisting the property developer on the basis of friendship.

The District Court held that WorkSafe had not proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed all charges. The District Court was not satisfied that Dong SH had been engaged in any role in respect of demolition work at the property, and as such it did not have duties under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA) in respect of that work.

WorkSafe appealed, arguing that a person who manages a demolition project for another as their friend is under the same obligations as someone who is not a friend.

The High Court agreed with WorkSafe.  It held that the issue for the District Court was not whether Dong SH had contractually agreed to manage or supervise the demolition. Instead, the question was whether Dong SH was actually managing or supervising the demolition, and was therefore a PCBU in relation to the demolition.  The matter was remitted back to the District Court for a new trial.

The simple point is that there is no requirement that a PCBU be contractually tied to the activity in question, for a duty to arise under HSWA.  If it were otherwise, a fundamental purpose of HSWA –that workers and others affected by work be afforded the highest level of protection against harm to their health, safety, and welfare from hazards and risks arising from work – could be frustrated or undermined.

If you have any questions about your health and safety obligations as a PCBU, please get in touch with our Health and Safety Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

 

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Contractors, Caveats, and Retention of Title clauses
The High Court in Development Construction Company Ltd v Mackenzie [2021] NZHC 546 has confirmed  that retention of title (RoT) clauses do not provide contractors with a caveatable interest. This dec...
How to break up with a suspected money launderer: High Court Guidance
The High Court has provided guidance on how to end a business relationship with a suspected money launderer.
15.04.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Regulatory
Adjudication When In Administration
In Meltzer and Lamacraft v Amstar New Zealand Ltd the High Court highlighted the interplay between insolvency and construction adjudication issues.
15.04.2021 Posted in Construction
What happens if my employee refuses to get the COVID-19 vaccination?
While there are enough COVID-19 vaccinations to inoculate each New Zealander, it has been reported that some ‘frontline’ workers have refused to get vaccinated, or have failed to attend vaccinatio...
14.04.2021 Posted in Business Advice & COVID-19 & Employment
Bereavement Leave Confirmed for Miscarriages and Stillbirths 
New Zealand has become the second country in the world to pass legislation that provides bereavement leave for mothers and their partners after a miscarriage or stillbirth.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment
Court of Appeal Overturns Employment Court’s Decision in Tourism Holdings
Tourism Holdings Limited v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Tourism Holdings) is the first decision in which the Employment Court considered section 8(2) of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act). The Court of Appeal has recently overturned this decision.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment
Guarantees must be in writing and signed to be enforceable
For a guarantee to be enforceable, the requirements set out in section 27 of the Property Law Act 2007 (Act) must be strictly complied with.  This is what the NZSC held in Brougham v Regan. The key i...
19.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->