13.08.2019

Fail to Plan, Plan to Fail: Leasing and Health and Safety

Fail to Plan, Plan to Fail:  Leasing and Health and Safety

When the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA) came into force over 3 years ago as part of the Government’s strategy to reduce serious work-related injuries, it marked an important shift in health and safety regulation.  One complaint about the previous legislation was that its approach did not provide the coverage necessary to ensure that those people who can prevent workplace harm have an explicit obligation to do so.

The introduction of the concept of a “Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking” – or PCBU – was designed to ensure that HSWA’s coverage was broad enough to capture all contemporary working relationships.

A PCBU has an overarching, primary duty for people’s health and safety while they are at work or where they can be affected by the work.  The PCBU must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of its workers, any other workers that it influences or directs, and any other people who could be put at risk by its work, for example, customers, visitors, volunteers or the public in general.

For commercial landlords and tenants, the obligations do not end there: HSWA imposes special duties where the PCBU controls or manages a workplace, and the fixtures, fittings and plant at the workplace.

For present purposes, it is sufficient to say that commercial landlords and commercial tenants are PCBUs.  Both parties are required to provide and maintain a “work environment that is, so far as is reasonably practicable, without risk to the health and safety of workers”.  As the landlord and tenant’s duties overlap, HSWA requires the parties to consult, co-operate and co-ordinate activities in respect of health and safety.

A PCBU cannot contract out of its duties, but it can make reasonable arrangements with another PCBU to assist in discharging its duties, taking into account the level of influence and control each PCBU has over the overlapping work.  The idea that underpins HSWA is that the duty to protect workers is a shared obligation, but the PCBU in the best position to eliminate or minimise the work-related risk must do so.

 Duties upon supply of a building

As part of ensuring the widest coverage possible, HSWA also includes duties to participants “upstream” in the supply chain: designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers.

In HSWA, supply includes supply by way of lease.

Structure includes a building or any component of the building.

Where a PCBU, as part of its business, supplies a structure that is to be used, or could reasonably be expected to be used as a workplace, it must ensure that the structure is without risks to the health and safety of persons including those who:

  • use the structure as a workplace;
  • carry out any reasonably foreseeable activity such as cleaning, maintenance, or repair in relation to the structure; and
  • are at or in the workplace in the structure and whose health or safety may be affected by a use of the structure.

At first blush, this does not appear to add a great deal to the primary duty, or duty of a person who controls the workplace, its fittings, fixtures and plant – however, the duty also imposes a requirement on the supplier to:

  • carry out, or arrange the carrying out of, any calculation, analysis, testing, or examination that may be necessary for the performance of the duty imposed by supplier duty; or
  • ensure that the calculation, analysis, testing, or examination has been carried out.

If calculations, analysis, testing or examination is required, then the PCBU landlord must supply it to the tenant.

Earthquakes

WorkSafe New Zealand’s position statement on earthquake-prone buildings points out that the national health and safety regulator will not take action against a landlord or building owner if they are complying with their obligations to strengthen their property as set out in the current Building Act 2004.

Structures must comply with specific design requirements under other legislation, such as the Building Act 2004 (this covers seismic standards, fire protection and general ventilation, etc.).  Copies of the design specifications and certificate of compliance, as well as any subsequent alterations or maintenance, should be held on file.

If a building owner does not comply with the Building Act 2004 and a person is harmed (or nearly harmed) following an earthquake, the building owner may be prosecuted under the Building Act 2004 and the HSWA.

Asbestos

 A landlord (and other potential PCBUs like property managers and building contractors) has a duty to identify asbestos and, if there is a risk of exposure to respirable asbestos fibres, create an asbestos management plan during the planning stage before the relevant work is carried out.  This duty applies when work is being planned and carried out and to the area relevant to the work creating a risk of exposure.

 Fail to plan; plan to fail

 Three years on from HSWA’s introduction, we are not aware of any prosecutions that WorkSafe has taken against landlords for breaching HSWA obligations.  It may very well be though, that enforcement action short of prosecution has occurred.  Regardless of the extent of regulatory action, the impetus to “repair the roof when the sun is shining” (perhaps literally in this case!) cannot be understated: PCBUs who have been prosecuted under HSWA have had some substantial fines handed down by the courts.

Landlords should assess if their lease documentation adequately deals with the allocation of duties under the HSWA.  Usually, a standard form deed of lease will be silent with regard to health and safety duties.  Ordinarily, the obligations are relegated to a reference that the tenant must comply with “the provisions of all statutes, ordinances, regulations and by-laws relating to the use of the premises”.  If you are in any doubt about your lease documentation, contact our Commercial Property Team.

For both landlords and tenants, it is important to identify risks presented by the premise, fixtures, fittings and plant.  Eliminate the risks where possible.  If not, you must have strategies to minimise the risks.  Document the assessments and plans.

Consult with your landlord/tenant, property manager, maintenance contractors and other PCBUs in the workplace in regard to health and safety matters arising from the premises.  Satisfy yourself that any other PCBU involved in the management of the workplace understands their obligations.  Formulate mutual strategies where appropriate.  Document any agreement, meetings or plans.

If you can exert a significant influence over the management of your business (director, partner, owner, CEO or similar), then you should satisfy yourself that your PCBU is resourced to meet its obligations and monitor effectiveness on a regular basis.

As always, if you have any questions about your health and safety obligations, feel free to give us a call.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Bereavement Leave Confirmed for Miscarriages and Stillbirths 
New Zealand has become the second country in the world to pass legislation that provides bereavement leave for mothers and their partners after a miscarriage or stillbirth.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Court of Appeal Overturns Employment Court’s Decision in Tourism Holdings
Tourism Holdings Limited v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Tourism Holdings) is the first decision in which the Employment Court considered section 8(2) of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act). The Court of Appeal has recently overturned this decision.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Guarantees must be in writing and signed to be enforceable
For a guarantee to be enforceable, the requirements set out in section 27 of the Property Law Act 2007 (Act) must be strictly complied with.  This is what the NZSC held in Brougham v Regan. The key i...
19.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice
UK Supreme Court Delivers Decision on Uber Driver Employment Status
The distinction between employee and independent contractor can be complex, particularly where the nature of the business model blurs the lines of standard employment practices.
16.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Holidays Act Overhaul – Taskforce Recommendations
There have been calls for an amendment of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act) for some time.
16.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Unwanted Land Covenants and Easements: Seeking a Court Order
The Supreme Court recently considered an application by Synlait Milk to modify a land covenant restricting the burdened land use to farming, grazing and forestry operation to protect the ability of the benefited land owner to develop a quarry.  This article looks at the circumstances in which the courts might give relief to parties in an application to extinguish or modify a covenant or easement.
15.03.2021 Posted in Property Law
New ICC Arbitration Rules 2021 come into force
The revised International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules for 2021 (2021 Rules) have now come into force and apply to all ICC arbitrations begun after 1 January 2021.  While the new Rules...
10.03.2021 Posted in Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->