13.08.2019

Fail to Plan, Plan to Fail: Leasing and Health and Safety

Fail to Plan, Plan to Fail:  Leasing and Health and Safety

When the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA) came into force over 3 years ago as part of the Government’s strategy to reduce serious work-related injuries, it marked an important shift in health and safety regulation.  One complaint about the previous legislation was that its approach did not provide the coverage necessary to ensure that those people who can prevent workplace harm have an explicit obligation to do so.

The introduction of the concept of a “Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking” – or PCBU – was designed to ensure that HSWA’s coverage was broad enough to capture all contemporary working relationships.

A PCBU has an overarching, primary duty for people’s health and safety while they are at work or where they can be affected by the work.  The PCBU must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of its workers, any other workers that it influences or directs, and any other people who could be put at risk by its work, for example, customers, visitors, volunteers or the public in general.

For commercial landlords and tenants, the obligations do not end there: HSWA imposes special duties where the PCBU controls or manages a workplace, and the fixtures, fittings and plant at the workplace.

For present purposes, it is sufficient to say that commercial landlords and commercial tenants are PCBUs.  Both parties are required to provide and maintain a “work environment that is, so far as is reasonably practicable, without risk to the health and safety of workers”.  As the landlord and tenant’s duties overlap, HSWA requires the parties to consult, co-operate and co-ordinate activities in respect of health and safety.

A PCBU cannot contract out of its duties, but it can make reasonable arrangements with another PCBU to assist in discharging its duties, taking into account the level of influence and control each PCBU has over the overlapping work.  The idea that underpins HSWA is that the duty to protect workers is a shared obligation, but the PCBU in the best position to eliminate or minimise the work-related risk must do so.

 Duties upon supply of a building

As part of ensuring the widest coverage possible, HSWA also includes duties to participants “upstream” in the supply chain: designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers.

In HSWA, supply includes supply by way of lease.

Structure includes a building or any component of the building.

Where a PCBU, as part of its business, supplies a structure that is to be used, or could reasonably be expected to be used as a workplace, it must ensure that the structure is without risks to the health and safety of persons including those who:

  • use the structure as a workplace;
  • carry out any reasonably foreseeable activity such as cleaning, maintenance, or repair in relation to the structure; and
  • are at or in the workplace in the structure and whose health or safety may be affected by a use of the structure.

At first blush, this does not appear to add a great deal to the primary duty, or duty of a person who controls the workplace, its fittings, fixtures and plant – however, the duty also imposes a requirement on the supplier to:

  • carry out, or arrange the carrying out of, any calculation, analysis, testing, or examination that may be necessary for the performance of the duty imposed by supplier duty; or
  • ensure that the calculation, analysis, testing, or examination has been carried out.

If calculations, analysis, testing or examination is required, then the PCBU landlord must supply it to the tenant.

Earthquakes

WorkSafe New Zealand’s position statement on earthquake-prone buildings points out that the national health and safety regulator will not take action against a landlord or building owner if they are complying with their obligations to strengthen their property as set out in the current Building Act 2004.

Structures must comply with specific design requirements under other legislation, such as the Building Act 2004 (this covers seismic standards, fire protection and general ventilation, etc.).  Copies of the design specifications and certificate of compliance, as well as any subsequent alterations or maintenance, should be held on file.

If a building owner does not comply with the Building Act 2004 and a person is harmed (or nearly harmed) following an earthquake, the building owner may be prosecuted under the Building Act 2004 and the HSWA.

Asbestos

 A landlord (and other potential PCBUs like property managers and building contractors) has a duty to identify asbestos and, if there is a risk of exposure to respirable asbestos fibres, create an asbestos management plan during the planning stage before the relevant work is carried out.  This duty applies when work is being planned and carried out and to the area relevant to the work creating a risk of exposure.

 Fail to plan; plan to fail

 Three years on from HSWA’s introduction, we are not aware of any prosecutions that WorkSafe has taken against landlords for breaching HSWA obligations.  It may very well be though, that enforcement action short of prosecution has occurred.  Regardless of the extent of regulatory action, the impetus to “repair the roof when the sun is shining” (perhaps literally in this case!) cannot be understated: PCBUs who have been prosecuted under HSWA have had some substantial fines handed down by the courts.

Landlords should assess if their lease documentation adequately deals with the allocation of duties under the HSWA.  Usually, a standard form deed of lease will be silent with regard to health and safety duties.  Ordinarily, the obligations are relegated to a reference that the tenant must comply with “the provisions of all statutes, ordinances, regulations and by-laws relating to the use of the premises”.  If you are in any doubt about your lease documentation, contact our Commercial Property Team.

For both landlords and tenants, it is important to identify risks presented by the premise, fixtures, fittings and plant.  Eliminate the risks where possible.  If not, you must have strategies to minimise the risks.  Document the assessments and plans.

Consult with your landlord/tenant, property manager, maintenance contractors and other PCBUs in the workplace in regard to health and safety matters arising from the premises.  Satisfy yourself that any other PCBU involved in the management of the workplace understands their obligations.  Formulate mutual strategies where appropriate.  Document any agreement, meetings or plans.

If you can exert a significant influence over the management of your business (director, partner, owner, CEO or similar), then you should satisfy yourself that your PCBU is resourced to meet its obligations and monitor effectiveness on a regular basis.

As always, if you have any questions about your health and safety obligations, feel free to give us a call.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

COVID-19 Redundancies: Cutting Corners Courts Censure
The Employment Relations Authority (Authority) has recently issued a determination that considers redundancies implemented due to the Government’s COVID-19 restrictions:  De Wys and Jenney v Solly...
13.08.2020 Posted in COVID-19 & Employment Law
Losses caused by 2011 earthquakes not a “series of losses”
Moore v IAG New Zealand Limited [2020] NZCA 319
12.08.2020 Posted in Insurance Law
Cancelled Plans and Future Liabilities: A post lockdown annual holidays FAQ
COVID-19 has not only hit many employers hard in terms of economic impact, it has also confronted employers with many employment challenges that require urgent attention.
04.08.2020 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
A high bar to set aside statutory demands to enforce adjudication determinations under the Construction Contracts Act 2002
The “pay now argue later” principle underpins the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (CCA).  The recent decision of C&R Property Development Ltd v MR Civil Ltd confirms the importance of this pr...
31.07.2020 Posted in Construction Law
Design life in the spotlight
Blackpool Borough Council v Volkerfitzpatrick [2020] EWHC 1523 (TCC) In 2009, Blackpool Borough Council (Principal), as principal, contracted with Volkerfitzpatrick Ltd (Contractor), as head contracto...
COVID-19 and the Future of Force Majeure
Not since Y2K have force majeure clauses been of so much focus.
Shareholder Agreements:  The Corporate “Pre-nup”
You’ve got a great idea for a business and you’re pumped to get to work. 
23.06.2020 Posted in Business Advice & Company Law
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.