3.05.2018

“Hallelujah, I’m free!” Exiting a multi-owner SME – the importance of a Shareholders’ Agreement

A Shareholders' Agreement is a contract between a company's owners which should regulated the way the business operates and how owners deal with each other.

As Diane Foreman recently commented, a business can provide two sources of incomes – the 1st while you’re working in it and the 2nd when you sell up.

There are any number of reasons why a shareholder/owner of a multi-owner SME might look for an exit including:

  • a “big” moment/event in your life means that family time might become all-important or you might need to realise some cash;
  • another time-consuming venture is becoming more attractive;
  • you have fallen out with the other owners; or
  • you want to cash-in whilst Brexit and the Donald are still future events!

Equally, a majority owner of the business might be struggling to work with the minority shareholders, but the minority are refusing to go “quietly into the night”.

Alternatively, the majority owner might have negotiated a big fat exit, but to a buyer that the minority could never work with.  In such circumstances there can be two unfortunate outcomes – the minority could scupper the deal; or the buyer may not need to buy the minority’s shares to gain control and the minority can’t demand that it does so.

Our firm has seen all of the above situations many times over and, in our experience, the default provisions of the Companies Act 1993 do not usually help. Therefore, in the absence of a well-drafted Shareholders’ Agreement and constitution, it is not uncommon for lengthy, costly and largely unsatisfactory disputes to result.  Whilst our excellent litigators won’t complain, it’s highly unlikely the business will be going forward whilst precious owner energy is focussed on such a dispute (and it doesn’t do much for staff morale).

A Shareholders’ Agreement is a contract between a company’s owners which should regulate the way the business operates and how owners deal with each other.  Unlike a company’s constitution, it is not made publicly available.  For exits, it should deal with:

  • when a shareholder may exit, or be forced to exit – i.e., if a dispute can’t be resolved;
  • when shares do or do not have to be offered to existing shareholders before being sold to 3rd parties;
  • how shares will be valued and paid for upon an exit;
  • the methods by which a majority seller may include, or be forced to include, the minority in an outside sale (known as “drag along” and “tag along” rights);
  • the obligations and restrictions on departing owners.

Every business owned by more than one shareholder should have a Shareholders’ Agreement.  Creating a good one includes holding sensible discussions about important concepts whilst everyone still “gets on”.  By clarifying, amongst other things, how decisions will be made, how new funding will be obtained, how the profits will be utilised, how the business will report to key stakeholders and how disputes will be settled, Shareholders’ Agreements create or reinforce a business’ foundations.

Ideally, such discussions are held before your business gets started or very shortly afterwards.  However, a Shareholders’ Agreement can be entered into at any time… it’s only too late when you’ve already hit a problem…

If you have any questions about Shareholders’ Agreements (including your current one), or if you do not currently have one in place and would like our assistance in drafting one, please contact Chris on 09 375 8690 or email chris.lee@heskethhenry.co.nz .

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Ebert Construction: Court provides Guidance on the Retentions Trust Regime
Following our previous updates (Ebert Construction Receivership – What You Need to Know and Ebert Construction – Receivership and Liquidation), on 12 November 2018 the High Court ordered that the ...
19.11.2018 Posted in Restructuring and Insolvency
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
When Actual Delay Losses Exceed Liquidated Damages
14.11.2018 Posted in Construction Law
So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen, goodbye…
When the employment relationship comes to an end, for whatever reason, there are still a few boxes to be ticked. So what needs to be done before you can bid each other a (hopefully) fond farewell?
5.11.2018 Posted in Employment Law
WorkSafe v Athenberry Holdings Ltd: The Competent Contractor?
Defining health and safety duties in a contracting situation is rarely straightforward.
1.11.2018 Posted in Health & Safety Law
Managing Partner Honoured with German Award
Erich Bachmann, the Managing Partner of Auckland based commercial law firm Hesketh Henry, has been awarded the Cross of the Order of Merit with Ribbon of the Federal Republic of Germany (Verdienstkreu...
30.10.2018
Building and Construction Law Journal
Construction partner, Nick Gillies, has been published in the latest Building and Construction Law Journal ((2018) 34 BCL 179).
18.10.2018 Posted in Construction Law
EBERT CONSTRUCTION: RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION
Introduction Following our Initial Note, the receivers of Ebert Construction Ltd (Ebert) released their first report on 1 October 2018.  Then, on 3 October 2018, Ebert put itself into liquidation, wi...
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.