16.03.2021

Holidays Act Overhaul – Taskforce Recommendations

There have been calls for an amendment of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act) for some time.

Since July 2012, the Labour Inspectorate, which is part of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE), has been conducting payroll audits of employers that employ at least 20 employees.  This process emerged in response to issues that were being raised about employers’ application of the Act.  So far, the Labour Inspectorate has conducted payroll audits of 241 employers and $237.7m has been paid to employees in arrears.

Employers like NZ Post, Restaurant Brands, Bunnings, the New Zealand Police and even MBIE have been left with large bills for the underpayment of their employees as a result of misapplications of the Act.  Fast food giant McDonalds could owe an estimated $90 million in arrears, affecting 60,000 employees over a 10 year period. 

As a result of ongoing issues with the Act, the Government established the Taskforce in 2018 to review and provide recommendations to improve the Act.  In 2021 the Taskforce published its 22 recommendations which were jointly agreed to by union and business representatives and accepted by the Government.  Further information on the Taskforce’s recommendations can be found here.

The Taskforce claims that its recommendations will improve the Act by providing a set of clear and transparent rules for establishing leave entitlements and payments, replacing the ambiguity of the Act’s current wording with easy to understand language.

The Taskforce continues the current Act’s regime of separating holiday entitlements (time) from the calculation of holiday pay despite the recommendation of many submissions to provide a simple regime that easily combined these elements.  In doing so, the Taskforce has missed the golden opportunity to provide holidays in a way that is easily understood, and more importantly calculated, by employees and employers, and consistent with the current accrual method of most payroll systems.  What is proposed appears to be a complicated patch rather than a transformational Holidays Act capable of adapting to evolving work practices.

Although the calculation of holiday pay was the most pressing issue on the Taskforce’s agenda, it also considered various other aspects of the Act.  Its key recommendations are:

  • Amendments to the rules and definitions for determining, calculating and paying leave entitlements;
  • Employees will be eligible for bereavement and family violence leave from their first day of employment;
  • Employees will begin accruing sick leave from their first day of employment;
  • Bereavement leave is extended for an additional 3 days and will include more family members, including cultural family groups and modern family structures; and
  • The parental leave override will be removed so that employees returning from parental leave will be paid fully when they take holiday leave.

These recommendations are yet to take effect, but are expected to be introduced into legislation by early 2022.  We will keep you informed on any developments.

If you have any questions about the Taskforce’s recommendations contact the Employment Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Contractors, Caveats, and Retention of Title clauses
The High Court in Development Construction Company Ltd v Mackenzie [2021] NZHC 546 has confirmed  that retention of title (RoT) clauses do not provide contractors with a caveatable interest. This dec...
How to break up with a suspected money launderer: High Court Guidance
The High Court has provided guidance on how to end a business relationship with a suspected money launderer.
15.04.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Regulatory
Adjudication When In Administration
In Meltzer and Lamacraft v Amstar New Zealand Ltd the High Court highlighted the interplay between insolvency and construction adjudication issues.
15.04.2021 Posted in Construction
What happens if my employee refuses to get the COVID-19 vaccination?
While there are enough COVID-19 vaccinations to inoculate each New Zealander, it has been reported that some ‘frontline’ workers have refused to get vaccinated, or have failed to attend vaccinatio...
14.04.2021 Posted in Business Advice & COVID-19 & Employment
Bereavement Leave Confirmed for Miscarriages and Stillbirths 
New Zealand has become the second country in the world to pass legislation that provides bereavement leave for mothers and their partners after a miscarriage or stillbirth.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment
Court of Appeal Overturns Employment Court’s Decision in Tourism Holdings
Tourism Holdings Limited v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Tourism Holdings) is the first decision in which the Employment Court considered section 8(2) of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act). The Court of Appeal has recently overturned this decision.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment
Guarantees must be in writing and signed to be enforceable
For a guarantee to be enforceable, the requirements set out in section 27 of the Property Law Act 2007 (Act) must be strictly complied with.  This is what the NZSC held in Brougham v Regan. The key i...
19.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->