16.03.2021

Holidays Act Overhaul – Taskforce Recommendations

There have been calls for an amendment of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act) for some time.

Since July 2012, the Labour Inspectorate, which is part of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE), has been conducting payroll audits of employers that employ at least 20 employees.  This process emerged in response to issues that were being raised about employers’ application of the Act.  So far, the Labour Inspectorate has conducted payroll audits of 241 employers and $237.7m has been paid to employees in arrears.

Employers like NZ Post, Restaurant Brands, Bunnings, the New Zealand Police and even MBIE have been left with large bills for the underpayment of their employees as a result of misapplications of the Act.  Fast food giant McDonalds could owe an estimated $90 million in arrears, affecting 60,000 employees over a 10 year period. 

As a result of ongoing issues with the Act, the Government established the Taskforce in 2018 to review and provide recommendations to improve the Act.  In 2021 the Taskforce published its 22 recommendations which were jointly agreed to by union and business representatives and accepted by the Government.  Further information on the Taskforce’s recommendations can be found here.

The Taskforce claims that its recommendations will improve the Act by providing a set of clear and transparent rules for establishing leave entitlements and payments, replacing the ambiguity of the Act’s current wording with easy to understand language.

The Taskforce continues the current Act’s regime of separating holiday entitlements (time) from the calculation of holiday pay despite the recommendation of many submissions to provide a simple regime that easily combined these elements.  In doing so, the Taskforce has missed the golden opportunity to provide holidays in a way that is easily understood, and more importantly calculated, by employees and employers, and consistent with the current accrual method of most payroll systems.  What is proposed appears to be a complicated patch rather than a transformational Holidays Act capable of adapting to evolving work practices.

Although the calculation of holiday pay was the most pressing issue on the Taskforce’s agenda, it also considered various other aspects of the Act.  Its key recommendations are:

  • Amendments to the rules and definitions for determining, calculating and paying leave entitlements;
  • Employees will be eligible for bereavement and family violence leave from their first day of employment;
  • Employees will begin accruing sick leave from their first day of employment;
  • Bereavement leave is extended for an additional 3 days and will include more family members, including cultural family groups and modern family structures; and
  • The parental leave override will be removed so that employees returning from parental leave will be paid fully when they take holiday leave.

These recommendations are yet to take effect, but are expected to be introduced into legislation by early 2022.  We will keep you informed on any developments.

If you have any questions about the Taskforce’s recommendations contact the Employment Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

UK Court of Appeal rules that that courts can order parties to engage in ADR: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416
The England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) has held that in certain circumstances, the courts can order parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or stay proceedings to allow the par...
24.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Health and Safety Tiles
Updated Guidance: IOD and WorkSafe release ‘Health and Safety Governance – A Good Practice Guide’
While we wait with bated breath for the outcome in the prosecution of former Ports of Auckland CEO, Tony Gibson, officers’ duties are very much at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Section 44 of t...
23.07.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.