How much does one truly deserve?

A critical analysis of the New Zealand and Australian High Courts' approach to quantum meruit claims within the construction industry

The Australian High Court case of Mann v Paterson Construction Pty Ltd and the New Zealand High Court case of Electrix Limited v The Fletcher Construction Company Limited both involved claims of non-contractual quantum meruit by contractors seeking compensation for services performed.  The judgments, which were issued one closely following the other, show the different ways the law of restitution has been understood and developed under Australian and New Zealand law. 

This essay makes the comment that:

  • In light of the Construction Contracts Act 2002, the New Zealand Court’s interpretation of quantum meruit as a mechanism to restore the plaintiff’s position rather than being exclusively tethered to unjust enrichment is the correct approach. 
  • Where there was an enforceable contract to begin with, the contract price should act as a cap on amounts recoverable in a quantum meruit claim. 
  • Conversely, where there was no enforceable contract to begin with, the amount recoverable should have regard to the project specific costs to ensure that a reasonable compensation is made to the plaintiff.  

To read Katie’s submission essay to the New Zealand Society of Construction Law Essay Prize 2021, please click here.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Insurance Contract Law – Parliament finally gets to consider long-awaited reforms
In February 2022, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) released an exposure draft of the Insurance Contracts Bill (MBIE’s Draft Bill) for public consultation and feedback.  MB...
24.04.2024 Posted in Insurance
Tower Troubles – Body Corporate 366567 (Harbour Oaks) v Auckland Council
Standing 40 storeys tall with 406 units, the Gore Street building in downtown Auckland (formerly known as “Harbour Oaks”) is presently the subject of New Zealand’s largest claim for residential ...
18.04.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Construction Framework Wide BW
OIO Spotlight:  Government issues new directive on foreign investment for build-to-rent housing developments
Earlier this year, the coalition Government announced that it would be introducing a new streamlined consent pathway for build-to-rent developments by way of amendments to the Overseas Investment Act ...
16.04.2024 Posted in Business Advice & Property
Incorporated societies’ reregistration deadline – April 2026 may be closer than you think
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 (2022 Act) came fully into force on 5 October 2023, meaning incorporated societies can now apply for reregistration under the 2022 Act.  Approximately 24,000 exist...
16.04.2024 Posted in Business Advice
iStock  Construction dpi
Call me? Care is required when calling on a bond
In the recent High Court decision Hawkins Ltd v Elizabeth Properties Ltd, Hawkins was successful in preventing EPL from calling on a $3m bond pending determination of a dispute principally over the ap...
HH News NZS  Release
What You Need to Know About the New NZS3910:2023
The new NZS3910:2023 (conditions of contract for building and civil engineering construction) was released by Standards New Zealand in December 2024 (see our article here).  It is now gaining relevan...
10.04.2024 Posted in Construction
Money stack black and white
Income is classified as relationship property – surprised?
For all couples, embarking on the journey of building a life together involves not only love and commitment but also financial considerations.  As you navigate through shared finances, it’s imp...
26.03.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.