9.05.2018

Insurance Case Law Update April 2014

In this update, we summarise insurance decisions issued at the close of 2013 and in first quarter of 2014.  Litigation arising from the Canterbury earthquakes continues to dominate the insurance landscape, with the Supreme Court granting leave for the appeal of many of the judgments discussed in our December report.

There have now been several decisions dealing with question of whether an insured can claim for damage sustained in successive earthquakes.  This is a vexed issue in claims where the building is underinsured or has ultimately been destroyed.  There are conflicting High Court decisions on whether damage suffered in an earlier event merges in the final destruction of the building.  The scope of the doctrine of merger was debated before the Supreme Court on 10 March 2014 at the hearing of Ridgecrest New Zealand Ltd v IAG New Zealand Ltd.  The Court’s judgment on the issue is awaited.

Detailed information on judgments having a wider impact on the insurance sector is linked to the case names highlighted in the summary table.  For further information on any of the issues raised in this update, please contact Brett Morley (+ 64 9 375 8745) or Christina Bryant (+ 64 9 375 8789).

Summary Table

 

CaseIssuesDecision / Principle
BFSL 2007 Ltd v Steigrad (SC)Application of s9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 to costs-inclusive policiesThe statutory charge under s 9(1) attaches to insurance proceeds that could be paid out under a liability policy.  The insurer is at risk if it pays out defence costs under a costs-inclusive policy and the maximum level of cover is not sufficient to satisfy both the obligation to pay defence costs and the obligation to indemnify the insured if liability is established in the underlying claim.
Skyward Aviation 2008 Ltd v Tower Insurance Ltd (CA)Interpretation of Tower’s Provider House Policy The insured, not the insurer, has the right to elect to reinstate the property and to choose between options for reinstatement.  If the insured elects to purchase a replacement property, he or she is not obliged to purchase a property which is comparable with the original property when new.
Mr V  v Sovereign Assurance Co Ltd (HC)How insurers should approach an assessment of entitlement to a benefitSovereign made an assessment that an insured was not eligible for a benefit under an income protection policy.  The judgment lists the principles the insurer must apply when exercising a contractual power to determine “to its satisfaction” whether a benefit should be paid.
Marriott v Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd (HC)Entitlement to recover damage caused by successive earthquakes
Automatic reinstatement of cover
When a property is destroyed
There was an automatic reinstatement of cover after each successive earthquake.  Notice to prevent the automatic reinstatement had to be given before a further loss-causing event took place, but there was no implied term requiring notice to be given within a “reasonable period”.  Under the terms of the policy, the insurer could elect to pay the depreciated replacement cost of the buildings and had no obligation to pay for repairs unless and until those costs were incurred.   “Destroyed” did not mean uneconomic to repair (a constructive total loss).
Crystal Imports Ltd v Lloyds (HC)Entitlement to recover damage caused by successive earthquakes
Automatic reinstatement of cover
Application of the doctrine of merger
There was an automatic reinstatement of cover after each successive earthquake.  Notice to prevent the automatic reinstatement had to be given before a further loss-causing event took place.  The Court applied the doctrine of merger, with the result that the insured was only entitled to claim for the destruction of the building.
Sydenham Recycling Ltd v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2013] NZHC 3518Scope of an additional increased cost of working provision under a business interruption policyThe purpose of the additional increased cost of working provision was to insure SRL for business interruption during the one year indemnity period.  A claim for moving and re-housing the business would fall within the scope and purpose of the policy if there was a pressing need to relocate.  However, the existing premises were safe to occupy due to temporary repairs undertaken by the insurer and SRL had successfully operated its business from those premises throughout the indemnity period.
Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd v Weathertight Homes Tribunal [2014] NZHC 342Scope and exercise of the WHT’s jurisdiction to remove a party from proceedingsSuccessful application for judicial review of tribunal member’s decision not to remove Vero as a party.  WHT had jurisdiction to determine at an interlocutory stage which insurance policy applied and to construe an exclusion provision in that policy in circumstances where there was no genuine factual dispute.  Section 11 of the Insurance Law Reform Act 1977 does not apply to exclusion clauses specifying the kind of loss or quantum of loss to which cover does not apply.
Angus v Ace Insurance Ltd [2014] NZHC 258Whether a fire was deliberately lit by the insuredThe balance of probabilities is the standard of proof in civil cases of suspected arson.  The judge noted that the appearance of witnesses is of limited value in determining truth.  Where possible, conclusions should be reasoned on the basis of contemporary materials, objectively established facts and the apparent logic of events.

Progress of Appeals

 

CaseIssuesDecision / Principle
Ridgecrest New Zealand Ltd  v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2013] NZSC 108Whether an insured is entitled to be paid for damage caused by successive earthquakes up to the limit of the sum insuredThe hearing of the appeal to the Supreme Court took place on 10 March 2014.  Judgment has been reserved.  A summary of the Court of Appeal decision is included in our December update.
Jackson v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZSC 12Whether “in connection with” requires a direct causal connection
Dishonesty exclusion
Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court declined.  The Supreme Court confirmed the test for dishonesty is a mixed objective-subjective test: a person’s subjective knowledge is measured against “normally acceptable standards.  A summary of the Court of Appeal decision is included in our December update.
University of Canterbury v Insurance Council of New Zealand Inc [2014] NZSC 13Whether local authorities can require owners to increase the seismic strength of buildings above 33% NBSLeave to appeal to the Supreme Court granted.  A summary of the Court of Appeal decision is included in our December update.
Firm PI 1 Ltd v Zurich Australian Insurance Ltd t/a Zurich New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZSC 19Whether sum insured was inclusive or exclusive of EQC coverLeave to appeal to the Supreme Court granted.  A summary of the Court of Appeal decision is included in our December update.
Fowler Developments Ltd v Minister for Canterbury Earthquake RecoveryLawfulness of 50% rateable offer to owners of vacant land and uninsured improved properties in the red zoneFowler Developments Ltd and the Quake Outcasts have applied for leave to appeal; the Supreme Court’s decision on the application for leave has yet to be delivered.  A summary of the Court of Appeal decision is included in our December update.
Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Updated Subcontract Agreement: SA-2017
The SA-2009 form of Subcontract Agreement is commonly used in the construction industry. It has undergone a review and a new SA-2017 form has been produced.
3.07.2018 Posted in Construction Law & Health & Safety Law
Distribution Agreements – 6 Key Considerations
While the exact nature and terms of a distribution agreement will vary between industries and jurisdictions, these 6 issues will always be important.
28.06.2018 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
Continued Importance of IP Protection for Manufacturers
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has recently released a report which identified key trends and challenges for the manufacturing sector (that report can be accessed here). Th...
28.06.2018 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
CONSTRUCTION LAW UPDATE – JUNE 2018
Recent Construction Law Decisions and Developments in New Zealand
18.06.2018 Posted in Construction Law
Updated Standard Consultancy Agreements
Two of the most commonly used standard agreements to engage consultants are the ACENZ / Engineering New Zealand (formerly IPENZ) Short Form Agreement (“SFA”) and the Conditions of Contract for Consultancy Services (“CCCS”).
5.06.2018 Posted in Construction Law
Managing Employees’ Mental Health Issues
Ministry of Health statistics confirm that during 2016, 169,454 people accessed mental health services in New Zealand. The law of averages suggests that most workplaces will – to a lesser or greater degree – be affected at some time by an employee’s mental health issue.
31.05.2018 Posted in Employment Law & Health & Safety Law
Managing Medical Incapacity: Enough To Make You Feel Sick?
Managers and HR practitioners often tell us that dealing with employees who are genuinely too sick or injured to work is one of their least favourite tasks. Frankly, we can see why.
31.05.2018 Posted in Employment Law
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.