19.11.2024

Left out of the will?

The Family Protection Act 1955 (FPA) is a significant piece of legislation in New Zealand that allows certain family members to challenge a will if they believe adequate provision has not been made for them.   

Who can make a claim?

Under the FPA, specific relatives of the deceased can make a claim.  These are:

  • Spouse, De Facto or Civil Union Partner: If the surviving partner believes they should have had more provision from their deceased partner’s estate, they can bring a claim.
  • Children: Both biological and legally adopted children of the deceased are eligible to make a claim against their parent’s estate. 
  • Grandchildren: While grandchildren can make a claim, it is more likely to be successful if their parent (the child of the deceased) has passed away.
  • Stepchildren and Parents: In some cases, stepchildren and/or parents of the deceased may be able to claim, though these claims are more challenging to prove and require the stepchild and/or parent to show they were financially dependent on the deceased.

Likelihood of Success

To make a successful claim, a claimant must show that the deceased breached their moral duty to them by failing to make adequate provision for their proper maintenance and support.

Young children and partners or spouses generally have a strong likelihood of success because the courts often view that there is a moral duty of the deceased to provide for them.

Adult children have a harder case.  If an adult child is financially independent, proper maintenance and support is more about acknowledging that the claimant was a significant part of the deceased’s life.  Any award to an adult child will be weighed against the child’s age, success and position in life at the time of the claim. 

Grandchildren, stepchildren, and parents usually need to demonstrate special circumstances, such as financial dependency or contributions to the deceased’s estate, to succeed.

It is important to remember that each case is unique and the Court weighs factors like the size of the estate, the needs of the claimant, and the intentions of the deceased.

What can you get?

If the Court finds that the deceased did breach their moral duty to the claimant, it can make an order for additional provision to be made for the claimant from the deceased’s estate.  However, the Court cannot completely rewrite the deceased’s will and is only allowed to make provision that does not exceed what is required to rectify the deceased’s breach of their moral duty.  It is difficult to provide an estimate for what a financially independent claimant might receive.  However, it is common for a claimant to receive an award of about 10% or more of the value of the estate in acknowledgement of the deceased’s breach of their moral duty.

Can a partner or spouse contract out of the FPA?

The FPA does not expressly ban contracting out so that a partner or spouse is barred from raising an FPA claim against their deceased partner/spouse’s estate.

However, it has been held that claimants cannot surrender their rights under the FPA through entering into a relationship property agreement, and that any attempt to contract out of the FPA is unenforceable.  The existence and terms of a relationship property agreement, however, can be relevant to assessing the extent that the deceased has breached their moral duty to the claimant and the level of provision that may be required to rectify the breach.

In the recent case of Christiansen v Jackson and Dodd [2024] NZFC 2717, the Court found that there was no breach of the deceased’s moral duty where the deceased had not made any provision for his partner and instead left his entire estate to his only child.  Here, the deceased and his partner had entered into a relationship property agreement that provided that they would like their estates to pass in accordance with their wills and that they would not make any claims against the other’s estate. 

In making its decision, the Family Court affirmed that, while the terms of the relationship property agreement attempted to prevent the parties from bringing a claim under the FPA, it is an established rule that parties cannot contract out.  However, the Court found that the deceased did not have a moral duty to provide for his partner under his will.  Persuasive factors in the Court’s decision included that the parties had entered into a relationship property agreement, the deceased had recently reviewed his will with his lawyer and that the claimant was financially independent. 

Key Takeaways

If you believe you have a claim against an estate or want to limit your exposure to a successful claim, please contact one of our Private Wealth team.  Any FPA claim must be made within 12 months from the date of probate, so it is important you discuss your potential claim with a lawyer in a timely way.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

 

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Post-Employment Obligations – Worth the Paper They Are Written On?
“Gone are the days … when an employee could confidently sign up to a restraint and then breach it in the bold expectation that ‘those things are not worth the paper they are written on’”.[1]...
22.10.2025 Posted in Employment
Proportionate Liability – the Next Evolution?
The current line of authorities establishing the ability for building owners to be able to claim in negligence for the cost of rectifying defects can be traced to the Court of Appeal’s (COA) judgmen...
17.10.2025 Posted in Construction & Insurance
New Zealand’s Resource Management Reform: Understanding the 2025 Amendment Act’s Transformative Changes to Fines and Insurance Coverage
Introduction The resource management landscape in New Zealand has undergone a seismic shift with the recent passage of the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Act 2025,...
10.09.2025 Posted in Regulatory
vecteezy a man in a suit is holding his finger to his lips   Extended fade cropped
Pay secrecy no more – what you need to know about the most recent employment law change
Conversations about what employees earn are no longer prohibited or required to be shrouded in secrecy. The Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill came into force on 27...
29.08.2025 Posted in Employment
HH Pg  Wave alternative
The America’s Cup Partnership and the Deed Of Gift: Navigating Legal Tensions
The newly released protocol (Protocol) for the 38th America’s Cup (AC38) marks another chapter in the evolution of the world’s oldest international sporting trophy.  While the Protocol introduces...
26.08.2025 Posted in Disputes & Private Wealth & Trade and Transport
iStock  Employment Concept BW
The latest trends and statistics coming out of the Employment Relations Authority
It is that time of year again when the Employment Relations Authority (Authority) publishes its Annual Report (the Report), and the Employment Law Team at Hesketh Henry loves a good stat! The Report p...
25.08.2025 Posted in Employment
Residential tenancy laws have changed. What you need to know as a tenant.
In 2024 the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (Act) was amended in response to the coalition Government’s commitment to increase the private rental supply by providing better support for landlords and ...
19.08.2025 Posted in Property
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.