26.11.2021

M&A Update – Warranty & Indemnity Insurance

This year we have seen strong private M&A activity and the use of warranty and indemnity (“W&I”) insurance in a number of transactions.

W&I insurance is a specialist insurance product designed to protect against financial loss resulting from claims under the warranties and indemnities given in relation to an acquired business.  It is a tool to allocate and manage risk and can be an attractive option that is available to both buyers and sellers.  For sellers, it offers a clean exit without a tail of contingent liabilities and the prompt distribution of sale proceeds as retention amounts are less likely to be required to cover warranty and indemnity claims.  It also gives buyers the comfort of having access to meaningful financial recourse against the insurer as opposed to pursuing a seller and its assets in the event of a claim.

There are a number of other reasons why W&I insurance cover may be sought:

  • To break a deadlock where negotiations reach an impasse in order to facilitate completion of a deal that might otherwise fail;
  • For widely held companies or co-operative companies, it may be inappropriate for the shareholder base to be liable for the warranties and indemnities being given by the target company;
  • If the seller is retaining an interest in the target company post-sale, W&I insurance helps eliminate any tension around potential warranty and indemnity claims which could otherwise affect the relationship between the parties;
  • The nature of the buyer or industry, i.e. if the buyer is a large, aggressive and highly litigious company or the industry is inherently risky, the seller may be more inclined to give certain warranties and indemnities if they know their risk will be underwritten; and
  • Stage of exit, i.e. if the owner is retiring and the sale proceeds is their nest egg, they may wish to protect against its potential erosion by warranty and indemnity claims.

While W&I insurance is a viable risk-allocation tool, there will be inevitable gaps between the liability regime under the transaction and the W&I cover due to policy exclusions such as transaction specific carve-outs, matters disclosed in due diligence, criminal penalties and fines, environmental matters and consequential losses.  However, with premiums generally ranging from 1% to 3% of transaction value (depending on the extent of cover), obtaining cover may be considered a worthwhile transaction cost.

In the past year, Hesketh Henry has advised on a number of private M&A transactions which relied on W&I insurance as a key deal-making component.  As the W&I insurance market becomes increasingly competitive and accessible, the use and uptake of W&I insurance is likely to be an upward trend.

For M&A and any other corporate and commercial advice, please contact Kate Telford or Sarah Gibbs.

 

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Off the Bench and into Action: The Whistle Blows on the Protected Disclosures Act 2022
On 1 July 2022 the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022 (Act) came into force, repealing the Protected Disclosures Act 2000.
19.08.2022 Posted in Employment
Retaining the Harvest: the right of receivers to withhold surplus funds to defend litigation
The recent decision of the High Court in Fistonich & Anor v Gibson & Ors [2022] NZHC 1422 considered whether receivers have a right to retain surplus funds to meet the cost of defending actual...
16.08.2022 Posted in Disputes & Insolvency and Restructuring
Commerce Commission releases draft report for residential building supplies market study
On 4 August 2022 the Commerce Commission (Commission) released its draft report setting out preliminary findings from its market study into the residential building supplies industry.
08.08.2022 Posted in Business Advice & Construction
Kabab-Ji v Kout Food Group confirms principles on determining governing law of an arbitration agreement
In February 2021 we discussed the English Supreme Court case of Enka v Chubb, which provided much-needed clarity on how the governing law of an arbitration agreement should be determined where the agr...
27.07.2022 Posted in Trade and Transport
Directors’ accountability for health and safety violations
The Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA) defines an ‘officer’ as a person who exercises significant influence over the management of a business or undertaking (PCBU).
21.07.2022 Posted in Health & Safety
Force Majeure – Not A Get Out Of Jail Free Card
Woolworths Group Ltd v Twentieth Super Pace Nominees Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 344
17.06.2022 Posted in Trade and Transport
Payment Claims: Incorrect Due Date From Delayed Delivery
Nicholls Group Projects Ltd v Plan Design Build Homes Ltd
20.05.2022 Posted in Construction
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->