18.10.2019

M&A Update – Warranty & Indemnity Insurance

This year we have seen strong private M&A activity and the use of warranty and indemnity (“W&I”) insurance in a number of transactions.

W&I insurance is a specialist insurance product designed to protect against financial loss resulting from claims under the warranties and indemnities given in relation to an acquired business.  It is a tool to allocate and manage risk and can be an attractive option that is available to both buyers and sellers.  For sellers, it offers a clean exit without a tail of contingent liabilities and the prompt distribution of sale proceeds as retention amounts are less likely to be required to cover warranty and indemnity claims.  It also gives buyers the comfort of having access to meaningful financial recourse against the insurer as opposed to pursuing a seller and its assets in the event of a claim.

There are a number of other reasons why W&I insurance cover may be sought:

  • To break a deadlock where negotiations reach an impasse in order to facilitate completion of a deal that might otherwise fail;
  • For widely held companies or co-operative companies, it may be inappropriate for the shareholder base to be liable for the warranties and indemnities being given by the target company;
  • If the seller is retaining an interest in the target company post-sale, W&I insurance helps eliminate any tension around potential warranty and indemnity claims which could otherwise affect the relationship between the parties;
  • The nature of the buyer or industry, i.e. if the buyer is a large, aggressive and highly litigious company or the industry is inherently risky, the seller may be more inclined to give certain warranties and indemnities if they know their risk will be underwritten; and
  • Stage of exit, i.e. if the owner is retiring and the sale proceeds is their nest egg, they may wish to protect against its potential erosion by warranty and indemnity claims.

While W&I insurance is a viable risk-allocation tool, there will be inevitable gaps between the liability regime under the transaction and the W&I cover due to policy exclusions such as transaction specific carve-outs, matters disclosed in due diligence, criminal penalties and fines, environmental matters and consequential losses.  However, with premiums generally ranging from 1% to 3% of transaction value (depending on the extent of cover), obtaining cover may be considered a worthwhile transaction cost.

In the past year, Hesketh Henry has advised on a number of private M&A transactions which relied on W&I insurance as a key deal-making component.  As the W&I insurance market becomes increasingly competitive and accessible, the use and uptake of W&I insurance is likely to be an upward trend.

For M&A and any other corporate and commercial advice, please contact Kate Telford or Sarah Gibbs.

 

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Bereavement Leave Confirmed for Miscarriages and Stillbirths 
New Zealand has become the second country in the world to pass legislation that provides bereavement leave for mothers and their partners after a miscarriage or stillbirth.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Court of Appeal Overturns Employment Court’s Decision in Tourism Holdings
Tourism Holdings Limited v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Tourism Holdings) is the first decision in which the Employment Court considered section 8(2) of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act). The Court of Appeal has recently overturned this decision.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Guarantees must be in writing and signed to be enforceable
For a guarantee to be enforceable, the requirements set out in section 27 of the Property Law Act 2007 (Act) must be strictly complied with.  This is what the NZSC held in Brougham v Regan. The key i...
19.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice
UK Supreme Court Delivers Decision on Uber Driver Employment Status
The distinction between employee and independent contractor can be complex, particularly where the nature of the business model blurs the lines of standard employment practices.
16.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Holidays Act Overhaul – Taskforce Recommendations
There have been calls for an amendment of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act) for some time.
16.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Unwanted Land Covenants and Easements: Seeking a Court Order
The Supreme Court recently considered an application by Synlait Milk to modify a land covenant restricting the burdened land use to farming, grazing and forestry operation to protect the ability of the benefited land owner to develop a quarry.  This article looks at the circumstances in which the courts might give relief to parties in an application to extinguish or modify a covenant or easement.
15.03.2021 Posted in Property Law
New ICC Arbitration Rules 2021 come into force
The revised International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules for 2021 (2021 Rules) have now come into force and apply to all ICC arbitrations begun after 1 January 2021.  While the new Rules...
10.03.2021 Posted in Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->