3.05.2018

New Director and Disclosure Requirements for New Zealand Companies

New director residency requirements are about to be introduced for all New Zealand Companies.  These changes come into effect on 1 May 2015, with all existing companies having an additional 180 days to comply with the new requirements (so by 28 October 2015).
Specifically, the New Zealand Companies Act 1993 will require companies incorporated in New Zealand to have at least one director who lives in either:

  1. New Zealand; or
  2. an enforcement country.

Enforcement countries are determined by the regulations. Currently, the only listed enforcement country is Australia.  Directors who are resident in an enforcement country must also be a director of a registered company (excluding a branch of an overseas company) in that country.  Details of the company will need to be provided to the Companies Office.  This will include the company’s registered name, number or identifier (if any) along with its address for service and registered office address.

Other changes include the requirement for directors to disclose their date and place of birth to the Companies Registrar (this will not be made publically viewable).  Companies will also be required to disclose, where applicable, information about their ultimate holding company (a body corporate that is the holding company of the company and is not a subsidiary of any other body corporate).  Information to be provided includes its name, country of registration, registration number, registered office and any other prescribed information.  There are also ongoing disclosure requirements relating to any changes to the ultimate holding company. Companies incorporated from 1 May 2015 onwards will need to meet all of these requirements.

Companies incorporated before 1 May 2015 will need to provide the date and place of birth of their directors, as well as details of their ultimate holding company information (if applicable), from 1 July 2015 onwards when they file their annual return.

Failure to comply with the requirements outlined may result in your company being removed from the New Zealand Companies Register.

Hesketh Henry can assist with the filing of the relevant required corporate documents for director appointments and implement measures to mitigate the liability which the NZ resident director will incur as a result of their appointment.  For more information about the new requirements, or to discuss any aspect of New Zealand company law, please contact:

Erich Bachmann       erich.bachmann@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8709
Kate Telford              kate.telford@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 7630
Chris Lee                   christopher.lee@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8690

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Clarity on Liquidated Damages following Termination
The United Kingdom Supreme Court in Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd [2021] UKSC 29 has clarified the operation of liquidated damages clauses in the event of termination.  The dec...
Is your will in draft form?  High Court refuses to exercise its discretionary power to validate a draft will notwithstanding beneficiaries’ consent
The High Court’s recent decision in Re: An application to validate the will of Olive Ruby Piper [2021] NZHC 534 serves as a valuable reminder to make sure that your estate planning documents are...
16.09.2021 Posted in Family & Trust Wills Estates
New Fair Trading Act provisions spark need to review small trade contracts
The Fair Trading Amendment Bill received Royal Assent on 16 August 2021 and is now the Fair Trading Amendment Act 2021 (Amendment Act).  The Amendment Act amends the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA), with...
Employment Relations Authority Finds Dismissal of Unvaccinated Border Worker to be Justified
On 1 September 2021, The Employment Relations Authority (Authority) determined in GF v New Zealand Customs Service [2021] NZERA 382, that the New Zealand Customs Service (Customs) was justified in its...
10.09.2021 Posted in Business Advice & COVID-19 & Employment
AML/CFT guidance with the High Court’s decision in Reserve Bank of New Zealand and TSB Bank Limited
On 31 August 2021, the High Court of Wellington released its decision on the Reserve Bank of New Zealand v TSB Bank Limited.
09.09.2021 Posted in AML/CFT & Banking and Finance
Supreme Court asserts Employment Relations Authority exclusive jurisdiction
The Supreme Court has recently issued a significant judgment clarifying that the Employment Relations Authority (Authority) has exclusive jurisdiction over claims arising in a “work context”. In d...
09.09.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment
How much does one truly deserve?
A critical analysis of the New Zealand and Australian High Courts' approach to quantum meruit claims within the construction industry
06.09.2021 Posted in Construction & Regulatory
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->