3.05.2018

New Director and Disclosure Requirements for New Zealand Companies

New director residency requirements are about to be introduced for all New Zealand Companies.  These changes come into effect on 1 May 2015, with all existing companies having an additional 180 days to comply with the new requirements (so by 28 October 2015).
Specifically, the New Zealand Companies Act 1993 will require companies incorporated in New Zealand to have at least one director who lives in either:

  1. New Zealand; or
  2. an enforcement country.

Enforcement countries are determined by the regulations. Currently, the only listed enforcement country is Australia.  Directors who are resident in an enforcement country must also be a director of a registered company (excluding a branch of an overseas company) in that country.  Details of the company will need to be provided to the Companies Office.  This will include the company’s registered name, number or identifier (if any) along with its address for service and registered office address.

Other changes include the requirement for directors to disclose their date and place of birth to the Companies Registrar (this will not be made publically viewable).  Companies will also be required to disclose, where applicable, information about their ultimate holding company (a body corporate that is the holding company of the company and is not a subsidiary of any other body corporate).  Information to be provided includes its name, country of registration, registration number, registered office and any other prescribed information.  There are also ongoing disclosure requirements relating to any changes to the ultimate holding company. Companies incorporated from 1 May 2015 onwards will need to meet all of these requirements.

Companies incorporated before 1 May 2015 will need to provide the date and place of birth of their directors, as well as details of their ultimate holding company information (if applicable), from 1 July 2015 onwards when they file their annual return.

Failure to comply with the requirements outlined may result in your company being removed from the New Zealand Companies Register.

Hesketh Henry can assist with the filing of the relevant required corporate documents for director appointments and implement measures to mitigate the liability which the NZ resident director will incur as a result of their appointment.  For more information about the new requirements, or to discuss any aspect of New Zealand company law, please contact:

Erich Bachmann       erich.bachmann@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8709
Kate Telford              kate.telford@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 7630
Chris Lee                   christopher.lee@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8690

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Phishing for payment: How Team New Zealand was scammed
Hackers often try to scam entities making international payments by impersonating one, or both, parties to the payment.
Requirements for international yachts and crew entering New Zealand
While New Zealand’s sea borders are currently closed to most foreign Flagged vessels, a number of pleasure craft and super yachts in the Pacific are hoping to enter New Zealand in time for the Ameri...
04.12.2020 Posted in Maritime Law
Class Actions – Supreme Court rules it’s “opt-out”, Law Commission Issues Paper imminent
Following the Supreme Court decision in Southern Response v Ross [2020] NZSC 126 the Law Commission is now set to release its Issues Paper on Class Actions and Litigation Funding on 4 December 2020. ...
The Commerce Commission is set to undertake a market study into the Retail Grocery Sector
On 17 November 2020 the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs announced a market study into the retail grocery sector through the Commerce Commission under Part 3A of the Commerce Act 1986 (Act)....
Court of Appeal cuts fine for Steel & Tube’s breaches of the Fair Trading Act 
The Court of Appeal in Commerce Commission v Steel & Tube Holdings Limited [2020] NZCA 549 has set aside last year’s High Court decision under the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA) where it imposed a ...
My way or the highway: repudiation, cancellation and dispute resolution clauses
In Jade Residential Ltd v Paul, the Court of Appeal reviewed two issues which may arise in contractual disputes: The right to cancel a contract for “partial” repudiation; and Whether an aggrieved...
Making up the shortfall: Subcontractor awarded an interim injunction requiring head contractor to hold its retentions in a separate trust account
In a recent High Court decision,[1] Hanlon Plumbing Limited (Hanlon) successfully obtained an interim injunction on a without notice basis requiring Downey Construction Limited (Downey) to pay retenti...
16.11.2020 Posted in Construction Law
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->