30.01.2014

New NZS Construction Contracts

For ten years NZS 3910:2003 was the form of construction contract most commonly used in New Zealand.  However, following industry feedback, NZS 3910:2003 has now been superseded by three new building and civil engineering contracts:

  • NZS 3910:2013 – Construction (Construction contract)
  • NZS 3916:2013 – Design and Construct (D&C contract)
  • NZS 3917:2013 – Fixed Term (Fixed Term contract)

The last in this trilogy became available on 28 January 2014, while the others were published in October 2013.

The splitting of NZS 3910:2003 into three separate standards provides more tailored general conditions for the different types of contracts and procurement arrangements that feature in the New Zealand construction sector.  Their publication follows feedback from the industry and lessons learned from NZS 3910:2003.

The new standards are easier to follow, contain new guidelines (that no longer have contractual status), have a more comprehensive tick-box type table for the Special Conditions, and include additional standard form documents (to save parties developing their own).   They also introduce some new terminology.

Among the substantive changes, the payment system has been simplified and contains different time periods, the method of calculating the price in cost reimbursement contracts has been set out more clearly and there is greater certainty about responsibility for arranging insurance and paying the deductibles.  The conditions are aligned with the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (as amended to date).

Standards New Zealand says the new contracts “reflect a fair risk allocation between the parties”.  While some parties will want to re-allocate risk in different ways for certain projects, overall, the need for Special Conditions should be significantly reduced.

These contracts are likely to become the default choice for most construction projects of any significance in New Zealand.  And their publication is timely given the anticipated spike in construction activity over the next decade.  Construction and engineering firms, and particularly those responsible for contract negotiations, should familiarise themselves with the changes.

Please click on pdf for a more detailed discussion of the key features of each new standard:[1]

For more information, or to discuss any aspect of construction law, please contact:

Nick Gilliesnick.gillies@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8767

Christina Bryantchristina.bryant@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8789

or other members of the Hesketh Henry Construction Law Team

 


[1] Unless otherwise stated, capitalised terms are defined terms in the applicable standard.
Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Close call on contribution: Beca decision confirms 10-year longstop does not bar contribution claims
In a 3-2 split decision, the Supreme Court in Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd v Wellington City Council [2024] NZSC 117 confirmed that contribution claims are not barred by the Building Act 2004...
11.10.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes & Insurance
Business man document
Addressing directors’ personal safety
The Companies Act 1993 (CA93) currently requires all company directors to make their residential addresses available as a matter of public record.  However, in recent times, incidents of stalking and...
Wielding the Secateurs: The High Court’s Pruning of Potentially Disruptive Decisions
Every now and then courts have to self-correct to prevent errant off-shoots of legal reasoning advancing into the law.  In the decision, IAG New Zealand Ltd v Degen [2024] NZHC 397, the High Court t...
19.09.2024 Posted in Insurance
UK Supreme Court: Are collateral warranties considered construction contracts?
The UK Supreme Court recently released Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd v Augusta 2008 LLP (formerly Simply Construct (UK) LLP) [2024] UKSC 23 determining that a collateral warranty used in the constr...
17.09.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
shutterstock
Bowen case part 2 – the ins and outs of the determination
In our last article, we wrote about what protected disclosures are and who can make them. In this article, we discuss the Employment Relations Authority (Authority) determination, Bowen v Bank of New ...
13.09.2024 Posted in Employment
Are trustees bound to relationship property agreements?
In Rawson v Prescott [2024] NZHC 1919, the High Court addressed a dispute involving trust property and a relationship property agreement. Mr RR, trustee of the GR Family Trust, sought summary judgment...
10.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
shutterstock
Bowen case part 1 – blowing the whistle
You may have heard of the term ‘whistleblowing’, but have you heard of ‘protected disclosures’? Protected disclosures are a creature of the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers)...
10.09.2024 Posted in Employment
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.