29.06.2018

New NZS Construction Contracts

For ten years NZS 3910:2003 was the form of construction contract most commonly used in New Zealand.  However, following industry feedback, NZS 3910:2003 has now been superseded by three new building and civil engineering contracts:

  • NZS 3910:2013 – Construction (Construction contract)
  • NZS 3916:2013 – Design and Construct (D&C contract)
  • NZS 3917:2013 – Fixed Term (Fixed Term contract)

The last in this trilogy became available on 28 January 2014, while the others were published in October 2013.

The splitting of NZS 3910:2003 into three separate standards provides more tailored general conditions for the different types of contracts and procurement arrangements that feature in the New Zealand construction sector.  Their publication follows feedback from the industry and lessons learned from NZS 3910:2003.

The new standards are easier to follow, contain new guidelines (that no longer have contractual status), have a more comprehensive tick-box type table for the Special Conditions, and include additional standard form documents (to save parties developing their own).   They also introduce some new terminology.

Among the substantive changes, the payment system has been simplified and contains different time periods, the method of calculating the price in cost reimbursement contracts has been set out more clearly and there is greater certainty about responsibility for arranging insurance and paying the deductibles.  The conditions are aligned with the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (as amended to date).

Standards New Zealand says the new contracts “reflect a fair risk allocation between the parties”.  While some parties will want to re-allocate risk in different ways for certain projects, overall, the need for Special Conditions should be significantly reduced.

These contracts are likely to become the default choice for most construction projects of any significance in New Zealand.  And their publication is timely given the anticipated spike in construction activity over the next decade.  Construction and engineering firms, and particularly those responsible for contract negotiations, should familiarise themselves with the changes.

Please click on pdf for a more detailed discussion of the key features of each new standard:[1]

For more information, or to discuss any aspect of construction law, please contact:

Nick Gilliesnick.gillies@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8767

Christina Bryantchristina.bryant@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8789

or other members of the Hesketh Henry Construction Law Team

 


[1] Unless otherwise stated, capitalised terms are defined terms in the applicable standard.
Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

The Impact of Unclear Communication
The recent decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Valmont Interiors Pty Ltd v Giorgio Armani Australia Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2021] NSWCA 9 is an example of an unclear direction resulting in a principal being unable to rely on a notification time bar in a construction contract.
11.10.2021 Posted in Construction
Penalties imposed for a single phone call attempting to enter a price-fixing agreement
The High Court in Commerce Commission v Specialised Container Services (Christchurch) Ltd recently imposed pecuniary penalties under the Commerce Act 1986 (the Act) for an attempt to enter into a pric...
07.10.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Regulatory
Update – August/September 2021 Lockdown – what financial support is available?
The Government is offering various support schemes to help employees and businesses cope with the 2021 COVID-19 Lockdown.  Given the differing eligibility requirements it is easy to become overwhelmed.
07.10.2021 Posted in Business Advice & COVID-19 & Employment
Exclusion of liability for deliberate breaches of contract 
In Mott Macdonald Ltd v Trant Engineering Ltd [2021] EWHC 754 (TCC) the English High Court considered a summary judgment application on the applicability of a limitation of liability clause to an alle...
How low can you go?  Commerce Commission’s prosecution against Bunnings dismissed
The District Court recently dismissed the Commerce Commission’s case against Bunnings for alleged misleading and deceptive representations under the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA). In dismissing the Co...
Civil Aviation Bill introduced to Parliament
After five years of preparation, the Civil Aviation Bill has been introduced to Parliament.  The aviation industry has seen dramatic change in the three decades since the current Civil Aviation Act w...
30.09.2021 Posted in Aviation
Regulators do not “bend” on AML/CFT compliance: Financial Markets Authority v CLSA Premium Limited
Earlier this month, the High Court released its decision in Financial Markets Authority v CLSA Premium New Zealand Limited.
23.09.2021 Posted in AML/CFT & Business Advice & Regulatory
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->