10.04.2018

New Zealand Construction Report

The Government has released its Construction Report, which takes an in-depth look at the state and direction of NZ’s construction industry.  Construction is one of the largest sectors in NZ’s economy.  The report signals an unprecedented boom and a strain on capacity over the next decade.

The report’s release follows a Government paper on 6 November 2013 (Residential Construction Sector Market Study Options), which seeks views on a range of proposals to reduce residential construction costs in NZ, and a Ministerial announcement that a new $13.6m tertiary school of construction is to be established in Wellington.  These developments are in anticipation of a “huge wave” of construction activity from the Christchurch rebuild ($30b estimate), Auckland’s housing shortage, a backlog of infrastructure projects and the leaking buildings tail.  They also reflect the Government’s frustration at a sector which it regards as fragmented, risk-averse and suffering from a lack of competition.  The proposals do not, so far, include any measures to address the widening of tort law in New Zealand in recent years, which has encouraged scatter-gun claims, most notably in leaky building disputes.

The expected boom presents many opportunities for construction firms and the wider economy, including the chance for improved scale and productivity.  However, there is concern that the small size of many NZ entities will limit their ability to take advantage of these opportunities or – worse – that they will struggle to manage more or larger projects.  This is compounded by a shortage of skilled labour across the board.  These factors may see more international firms enter the NZ market over the next few years, particularly on the consulting side.

From a legal perspective, the strains on capacity coupled with the expected demand are a recipe for delays, disruption, cost overruns and ultimately claims.  The Government seems to recognise this to some extent in that it proposes an “Integrated Project Delivery”, which promotes an open, collaborative risk-sharing approach.  It is unclear what this would actually mean in practice or how it might be recorded in contract.  Commercial parties want certainty, especially when it comes to allocating risk, and admirable but vague concepts about collaboration often sit uncomfortably with this when it comes to negotiating and executing terms.

The construction industry already benefits from a variety of standard form contracts, produced by respected industry organisations.  In our experience, having the right contractual framework, together with a robust procurement process and careful project management, are fundamental to the success of a construction project.

Even then, claims can still arise.  Early identification and prompt resolution is always preferable – not least because it avoids protracted and expensive disputes after completion.  Adjudication is an essential tool in achieving this and the anticipated amendment to the Construction Contracts Act extending adjudication to consultants is to be welcomed.  The sheer volume and pace of building work in NZ over the next few years means adjudications are likely to become more prevalent.

In some instances (eg large infrastructure projects where delays would be intolerable), it may be appropriate to use a Dispute Resolution Board.  A DRB comprises independent persons appointed by the contracting parties at the outset of the project, who meet during the course of the works to hear and resolve issues as they arise (subject to a right of appeal to arbitration).  Admittedly, a DRB will add another preliminary overhead but they can be a more cost-effective way of resolving disputes since the board is closer to the project.

For more information, or to discuss any aspect of construction law, please contact:

Nick Gilliesnick.gillies@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8767

Christina Bryantchristina.bryant@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8789

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Updated Subcontract Agreement: SA-2017
The SA-2009 form of Subcontract Agreement is commonly used in the construction industry. It has undergone a review and a new SA-2017 form has been produced.
3.07.2018 Posted in Construction Law & Health & Safety Law
Distribution Agreements – 6 Key Considerations
While the exact nature and terms of a distribution agreement will vary between industries and jurisdictions, these 6 issues will always be important.
28.06.2018 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
Continued Importance of IP Protection for Manufacturers
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has recently released a report which identified key trends and challenges for the manufacturing sector (that report can be accessed here). Th...
28.06.2018 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
CONSTRUCTION LAW UPDATE – JUNE 2018
Recent Construction Law Decisions and Developments in New Zealand
18.06.2018 Posted in Construction Law
Updated Standard Consultancy Agreements
Two of the most commonly used standard agreements to engage consultants are the ACENZ / Engineering New Zealand (formerly IPENZ) Short Form Agreement (“SFA”) and the Conditions of Contract for Consultancy Services (“CCCS”).
5.06.2018 Posted in Construction Law
Managing Employees’ Mental Health Issues
Ministry of Health statistics confirm that during 2016, 169,454 people accessed mental health services in New Zealand. The law of averages suggests that most workplaces will – to a lesser or greater degree – be affected at some time by an employee’s mental health issue.
31.05.2018 Posted in Employment Law & Health & Safety Law
Managing Medical Incapacity: Enough To Make You Feel Sick?
Managers and HR practitioners often tell us that dealing with employees who are genuinely too sick or injured to work is one of their least favourite tasks. Frankly, we can see why.
31.05.2018 Posted in Employment Law
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.