14.05.2020

COVID-19: OIO Update

Government fast-tracks new measures during COVID-19 crisis

Yesterday, the Government announced that it is urgently amending the Overseas Investment Act (“Act“) to protect New Zealand’s businesses and assets from opportunistic foreign acquisitions as the economy recovers from the COVID-19 fallout.  The changes follow similar moves in other jurisdictions (including Australia) and essentially bring forward the “national interest test” and other critical measures of the Phase Two reforms that were publicly announced in late 2019, but with some temporary amendments to respond to the urgent COVID-19 situation.

Temporary notification requirement

The urgent amendments to the Act will temporarily apply a “national interest test” to all foreign investments (that are not already subject to the Act), regardless of dollar value, where the transaction will result in a more than a 25% foreign ownership interest in a New Zealand business or more than 25% of its assets, or will increase an existing foreign ownership interest up to or beyond 50%, 75%, or 100%.

This temporary power will take the form of a simple notification requirement.  It will be reviewed every 90 days and will remain in place for as long as it is necessary to protect the national interests of New Zealand while the economic aftermath of COVID-19 continues to significantly impact the country.  It is difficult to assess how long this may be.

The Government has advised that the process will be quick to ensure investment is not unduly delayed while protecting Kiwi businesses from being preyed upon by foreign investors as they recover from the damage caused by COVID-19.  The details of the notification requirements and established timelines are not yet clear. 

“National interest test”

In addition to the above temporary measures and once they have been lifted, a “national interest test” for our most strategically important business assets will remain.  This will apply to transactions that are already subject to the Act, with a minimum threshold of $100 million (or higher, if set by the terms of an international trade agreement), as well as investments in sensitive land and fishing quota.  The test will provide the Minister with broad discretionary power to deny consent to any investment that the Minister considers is contrary to New Zealand’s national interest.

Other Phase Two Reforms Accelerated

Other measures of the Phase Two reforms will also be fast-tracked, such as equipping the Overseas Investment Office with enhanced enforcement powers.

Further, in recognition of the anticipated need for capital by New Zealand businesses in the near term, the requirement for certain low-risk transactions to obtain OIO consent will be removed from the Act’s regime.  This will include purchases by fundamentally New Zealand entities (as referred to in our earlier article on the Phase Two reforms) and small changes in existing shareholdings.  In addition, the Act’s supporting regulations will be amended to extend existing exemptions and remove two further classes of low risk lending and portfolio management transactions from screening.

We expect that the business community will welcome this simplification of the Act’s regime which aims to cut some red tape and promote productive, sustainable, and inclusive foreign investment. 

When will these changes come into effect?

The critical COVID-19 measures of the Phase Two reforms are expected to be in force by mid-June.  The balance of the Phase Two reforms will be progressed in the usual way to ensure that they are fully considered by Parliament.

If you would like any further information about the proposed changes, or how they may affect your business, then please contact the Business Advice Team.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Plan fail results in health and safety conviction
Deliver the health and safety work you promise, or there may be legal consequences – as a health and safety consultancy recently learnt! Earlier this year, WorkSafe prosecuted Safe Business Solution...
25.10.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Contract stock edit e
Rent reviews
As a tenant or landlord under a commercial lease, your business will be affected by rent reviews during the life of your lease.  Therefore, it is essential that you understand the most common types o...
24.10.2024 Posted in Property
Serious misconduct – how serious does the conduct have to be?
What is serious misconduct, and when and how can an employer bring an employee’s employment to an end on these grounds?
23.10.2024 Posted in Employment
iStock  Construction dpi
“More than an opinion”: criminal liability arising from PS4 producer statements under the Building Act 2004
In Solicitor-General’s Reference (No 1 of 2022) from CRI-2021-463-55 ([2022] NZHC 556) [2024] NZCA 514 the Court of Appeal was asked to consider the following question: Was the Court correct to find...
15.10.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Close call on contribution: Beca decision confirms 10-year longstop does not bar contribution claims
In a 3-2 split decision, the Supreme Court in Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd v Wellington City Council [2024] NZSC 117 confirmed that contribution claims are not barred by the Building Act 2004...
11.10.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes & Insurance
Business man document
Addressing directors’ personal safety
The Companies Act 1993 (CA93) currently requires all company directors to make their residential addresses available as a matter of public record.  However, in recent times, incidents of stalking and...
Wielding the Secateurs: The High Court’s Pruning of Potentially Disruptive Decisions
Every now and then courts have to self-correct to prevent errant off-shoots of legal reasoning advancing into the law.  In the decision, IAG New Zealand Ltd v Degen [2024] NZHC 397, the High Court t...
19.09.2024 Posted in Insurance
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.