30.05.2018

Rebuilding New Zealand: A case for Dispute Resolution Boards

Download pdf paper

Download Powerpoint slides

New Zealand sits on the cusp of the largest construction boom in a generation.  One of the challenges (and opportunities) that this presents is how best to manage the inevitable increase in building and engineering disputes.  While this is especially true for the Canterbury rebuild, the pressures will be felt around country.

The attached paper, which was prepared for the 2014 AMINZ dispute resolution conference, discusses and aims to raise awareness of Dispute Resolution Boards (DRBs) as an alternative method of dispute resolution for construction projects.

The DRB concept was developed nearly forty years ago, yet DRBs have been adopted in only a handful of New Zealand projects to date.  It follows that there is scope to increase their use nationally, with potentially significant savings to principals and head contractors from avoiding or minimising costly disputes at the end of a project.

The work of a DRB is in the nature of ‘spot arbitration’ with a board of independent persons empowered by contract to assist the parties and make determinations during the life of the project.  What distinguishes it from other dispute resolution processes is that the board is already familiar with the project and benefits from considering issues contemporaneous with the works.  As a result, there is an emphasis on avoidance as much as resolution, and DRBs have an impressive track record around the world.

The paper focuses on DRBs as a dispute resolution method in a New Zealand context.  In doing so it explores what is driving New Zealand’s looming construction boom and the high likelihood of increased claims.  While DRBs are traditionally suited to infrastructure projects (because of the associated costs), the paper also explores the idea of mini-DRBs for smaller projects, including whether central or local government, or professional organisations like AMINZ, have a part to play in promoting and facilitating their use.

Please click on the link above for a full copy of the paper and associated PowerPoint slides.

If you would like further information , please contact Nick Gillies.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

The Impact of Unclear Communication
The recent decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Valmont Interiors Pty Ltd v Giorgio Armani Australia Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2021] NSWCA 9 is an example of an unclear direction resulting in a principal being unable to rely on a notification time bar in a construction contract.
11.10.2021 Posted in Construction
Penalties imposed for a single phone call attempting to enter a price-fixing agreement
The High Court in Commerce Commission v Specialised Container Services (Christchurch) Ltd recently imposed pecuniary penalties under the Commerce Act 1986 (the Act) for an attempt to enter into a pric...
07.10.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Regulatory
Update – August/September 2021 Lockdown – what financial support is available?
The Government is offering various support schemes to help employees and businesses cope with the 2021 COVID-19 Lockdown.  Given the differing eligibility requirements it is easy to become overwhelmed.
07.10.2021 Posted in Business Advice & COVID-19 & Employment
Exclusion of liability for deliberate breaches of contract 
In Mott Macdonald Ltd v Trant Engineering Ltd [2021] EWHC 754 (TCC) the English High Court considered a summary judgment application on the applicability of a limitation of liability clause to an alle...
How low can you go?  Commerce Commission’s prosecution against Bunnings dismissed
The District Court recently dismissed the Commerce Commission’s case against Bunnings for alleged misleading and deceptive representations under the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA). In dismissing the Co...
Civil Aviation Bill introduced to Parliament
After five years of preparation, the Civil Aviation Bill has been introduced to Parliament.  The aviation industry has seen dramatic change in the three decades since the current Civil Aviation Act w...
30.09.2021 Posted in Aviation
Regulators do not “bend” on AML/CFT compliance: Financial Markets Authority v CLSA Premium Limited
Earlier this month, the High Court released its decision in Financial Markets Authority v CLSA Premium New Zealand Limited.
23.09.2021 Posted in AML/CFT & Business Advice & Regulatory
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->