30.05.2018

Rebuilding New Zealand: A case for Dispute Resolution Boards

Download pdf paper

Download Powerpoint slides

New Zealand sits on the cusp of the largest construction boom in a generation.  One of the challenges (and opportunities) that this presents is how best to manage the inevitable increase in building and engineering disputes.  While this is especially true for the Canterbury rebuild, the pressures will be felt around country.

The attached paper, which was prepared for the 2014 AMINZ dispute resolution conference, discusses and aims to raise awareness of Dispute Resolution Boards (DRBs) as an alternative method of dispute resolution for construction projects.

The DRB concept was developed nearly forty years ago, yet DRBs have been adopted in only a handful of New Zealand projects to date.  It follows that there is scope to increase their use nationally, with potentially significant savings to principals and head contractors from avoiding or minimising costly disputes at the end of a project.

The work of a DRB is in the nature of ‘spot arbitration’ with a board of independent persons empowered by contract to assist the parties and make determinations during the life of the project.  What distinguishes it from other dispute resolution processes is that the board is already familiar with the project and benefits from considering issues contemporaneous with the works.  As a result, there is an emphasis on avoidance as much as resolution, and DRBs have an impressive track record around the world.

The paper focuses on DRBs as a dispute resolution method in a New Zealand context.  In doing so it explores what is driving New Zealand’s looming construction boom and the high likelihood of increased claims.  While DRBs are traditionally suited to infrastructure projects (because of the associated costs), the paper also explores the idea of mini-DRBs for smaller projects, including whether central or local government, or professional organisations like AMINZ, have a part to play in promoting and facilitating their use.

Please click on the link above for a full copy of the paper and associated PowerPoint slides.

If you would like further information , please contact Nick Gillies.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Bereavement Leave Confirmed for Miscarriages and Stillbirths 
New Zealand has become the second country in the world to pass legislation that provides bereavement leave for mothers and their partners after a miscarriage or stillbirth.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Court of Appeal Overturns Employment Court’s Decision in Tourism Holdings
Tourism Holdings Limited v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Tourism Holdings) is the first decision in which the Employment Court considered section 8(2) of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act). The Court of Appeal has recently overturned this decision.
26.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Guarantees must be in writing and signed to be enforceable
For a guarantee to be enforceable, the requirements set out in section 27 of the Property Law Act 2007 (Act) must be strictly complied with.  This is what the NZSC held in Brougham v Regan. The key i...
19.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice
UK Supreme Court Delivers Decision on Uber Driver Employment Status
The distinction between employee and independent contractor can be complex, particularly where the nature of the business model blurs the lines of standard employment practices.
16.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Holidays Act Overhaul – Taskforce Recommendations
There have been calls for an amendment of the Holidays Act 2003 (Act) for some time.
16.03.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment Law
Unwanted Land Covenants and Easements: Seeking a Court Order
The Supreme Court recently considered an application by Synlait Milk to modify a land covenant restricting the burdened land use to farming, grazing and forestry operation to protect the ability of the benefited land owner to develop a quarry.  This article looks at the circumstances in which the courts might give relief to parties in an application to extinguish or modify a covenant or easement.
15.03.2021 Posted in Property Law
New ICC Arbitration Rules 2021 come into force
The revised International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules for 2021 (2021 Rules) have now come into force and apply to all ICC arbitrations begun after 1 January 2021.  While the new Rules...
10.03.2021 Posted in Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->