24.11.2017

Recent case finds that lack of a resident director isn’t immediately fatal

A New Zealand company needs at least one resident director

The absence of a resident director might result in a New Zealand company being struck off, but that won’t prevent it from enforcing its rights whilst still in existence.

A New Zealand company needs at least one resident director, i.e., one director who is either:

a)   New Zealand resident; or

b)   an Australian resident who is also a director of an Australian company.

Failing to satisfy the resident director requirement is a breach of the Companies Act 1993 and can result in a company being struck off or put into liquidation. However, as we discuss further below, New Zealand’s High Court has recently ruled that such a breach will not disqualify a company from the protection of the law or from being able to validly exercise its powers and rights whilst it does still exist.

Case review

YL NZ Investment Limited v Ling [28 NZTC 23-026] concerned the sale and purchase of real estate for $3.5 million inclusive of Goods and Services Tax. At the time the agreement was signed:

  • YL (the purchaser) was registered for GST;
  • Ling (the vendor) gave a warranty that she was not. Therefore, YL entered the agreement believing it could claim a GST input tax credit on the sale of $365,869.57; and
  • YL did not have a resident director.

The NZ Inland Revenue Department refused YL’s subsequent claim for the input tax credit on the basis that, although Ling was not registered for GST at the time, she should have been. Therefore, the sale of the property was zero-rated for GST, meaning GST was neither payable by Ling, nor claimable by YL.

YL sued Ling for breach of warranty. In her defence, Ling argued that YL’s failure to have a resident director at the relevant time meant it had no standing to bring this claim.

In awarding judgment to YL for the amount of the missing GST input tax credit, the Judge found that not having a resident director did not disqualify YL from the protection of the law, nor from being able to validly exercise its powers and rights.

Next steps

This case provides reassurance about a company’s ability to legitimately carry on business even without a resident director. However, it doesn’t change the fact that such a breach could lead to the company being struck off. If you need assistance appointing a resident director to a New Zealand company, or with any other New Zealand corporate legal advice, please get in touch, 09 375 8700.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Business Succession Planning – Shareholder Agreements What have you and your co-investors agreed?
A successful exit from a business can be, and often is, affected by the steps you take when setting up the business. Although there are various business structures that can be used in New Zealand, by ...
06.11.2025 Posted in Corporate & Commercial & Private Wealth
Post-Employment Obligations – Worth the Paper They Are Written On?
“Gone are the days … when an employee could confidently sign up to a restraint and then breach it in the bold expectation that ‘those things are not worth the paper they are written on’”.[1]...
22.10.2025 Posted in Employment
Proportionate Liability – the Next Evolution?
The current line of authorities establishing the ability for building owners to be able to claim in negligence for the cost of rectifying defects can be traced to the Court of Appeal’s (COA) judgmen...
17.10.2025 Posted in Construction & Insurance
New Zealand’s Resource Management Reform: Understanding the 2025 Amendment Act’s Transformative Changes to Fines and Insurance Coverage
Introduction The resource management landscape in New Zealand has undergone a seismic shift with the recent passage of the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Act 2025,...
10.09.2025 Posted in Regulatory
vecteezy a man in a suit is holding his finger to his lips   Extended fade cropped
Pay secrecy no more – what you need to know about the most recent employment law change
Conversations about what employees earn are no longer prohibited or required to be shrouded in secrecy. The Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill came into force on 27...
29.08.2025 Posted in Employment
HH Pg  Wave alternative
The America’s Cup Partnership and the Deed Of Gift: Navigating Legal Tensions
The newly released protocol (Protocol) for the 38th America’s Cup (AC38) marks another chapter in the evolution of the world’s oldest international sporting trophy.  While the Protocol introduces...
26.08.2025 Posted in Disputes & Private Wealth & Trade and Transport
iStock  Employment Concept BW
The latest trends and statistics coming out of the Employment Relations Authority
It is that time of year again when the Employment Relations Authority (Authority) publishes its Annual Report (the Report), and the Employment Law Team at Hesketh Henry loves a good stat! The Report p...
25.08.2025 Posted in Employment
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.