23.06.2014

The Rules of the Game are Changing

Nothing says excitement quite like the rules of civil procedure.  We might laugh at that statement, but such rules are important insofar as they govern the way cases are commenced and managed through to resolution.

As indicated in our previous article there are impending wholesale changes to the District Court Rules (DCRs).  Following Royal Assent on 26 May 2014, these changes will come into effect on 1 July 2014.  Every proceeding commenced after this date will need to comply with the new DCRs.

The key change to note is that the much-maligned and repetitive notice of claim and information capsule procedure will be replaced by the traditional statement of claim process.  Anyone familiar with the High Court Rules will instantly recognise the procedure required under the new DCRs.  On a broader level, the new DCRs will align with the High Court Rules except where each court has a substantive difference in procedure.  An example of a difference is initial disclosure.  Under the High Court Rules, each party is required to provide documents when filing its first document.  Under the new DCRs, each party will only need to provide a list of documents when filing its first document, and will only need to provide the documents themselves if a request is made for them.

Further changes to the District Court are expected in future:  for example, the civil jurisdiction of the District Court is likely to increase from its present $200,000 to a higher figure (currently proposed as $350,000).  Substantive changes like this are part of the Judicature Modernisation Bill.  That Bill has recently been reported out of Select Committee, which has recommended that it be passed into law.  When that might occur is difficult to predict particularly with the forthcoming election, but we note that no practical parties are attempting to block the Bill at this stage.

The changes coming into force on 1 July 2014 are welcomed.  They should provide clarity and reduce the time between filing a claim and having it heard.  This can only assist in the administration of justice.

If you would like further information about the new DCRs and how they may impact upon you, please contact Nick Gillies.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Are trustees bound to relationship property agreements?
In Rawson v Prescott [2024] NZHC 1919, the High Court addressed a dispute involving trust property and a relationship property agreement. Mr RR, trustee of the GR Family Trust, sought summary judgment...
10.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
shutterstock
Bowen case part 1 – blowing the whistle
You may have heard of the term ‘whistleblowing’, but have you heard of ‘protected disclosures’? Protected disclosures are a creature of the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers)...
10.09.2024 Posted in Employment
Construction theme black and white
Contractors take note – are any of your retentions clauses prohibited provisions?
In Stevensons Structural Engineers 1978 Ltd (in liq) v McMillan & Lockwood (PN) Ltd & Anor [2024] NZHC 2415, the High Court held that the timing for payment out of retentions in certain subcon...
05.09.2024 Posted in Construction
Avoiding the Grey Area: Interpreting Trust Beneficiary Classes
Beneficiary classes in trust deeds should be clearly defined to ensure the assets of the trust benefit the people who the settlor(s) of the trust originally intended.   If they are not, then disputes...
05.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
vecteezy square wooden blocks lined up on a wooden workbench  Insurance Icons centered
Hesketh Henry’s Insurance Team author LexisNexis Practical Guidance Insurance
Hesketh Henry’s Insurance Team is delighted to celebrate the launch of Practical Guidance Insurance. LexisNexis has launched Practical Guidance Insurance containing 12 topics and over 50 sub-topics ...
03.09.2024 Posted in Insurance
Contract dictionary
Is ‘close enough’ OK? Reasonable endeavours to overcome a force majeure event
The English Supreme Court’s decision in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV [2024] UKSC 18 has demonstrated the effect sanctions may have on a contract as a force majeure event and clarified the parameters of...
03.09.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
The useful Mackay v Dick principle is part of English law – might it apply here?
The useful Mackay v Dick principle is part of English law – might it apply here? In King Crude Carriers S.A. & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors, the English and Wales Court of Appeal confi...
03.09.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.