23.06.2014

The Rules of the Game are Changing

Nothing says excitement quite like the rules of civil procedure.  We might laugh at that statement, but such rules are important insofar as they govern the way cases are commenced and managed through to resolution.

As indicated in our previous article there are impending wholesale changes to the District Court Rules (DCRs).  Following Royal Assent on 26 May 2014, these changes will come into effect on 1 July 2014.  Every proceeding commenced after this date will need to comply with the new DCRs.

The key change to note is that the much-maligned and repetitive notice of claim and information capsule procedure will be replaced by the traditional statement of claim process.  Anyone familiar with the High Court Rules will instantly recognise the procedure required under the new DCRs.  On a broader level, the new DCRs will align with the High Court Rules except where each court has a substantive difference in procedure.  An example of a difference is initial disclosure.  Under the High Court Rules, each party is required to provide documents when filing its first document.  Under the new DCRs, each party will only need to provide a list of documents when filing its first document, and will only need to provide the documents themselves if a request is made for them.

Further changes to the District Court are expected in future:  for example, the civil jurisdiction of the District Court is likely to increase from its present $200,000 to a higher figure (currently proposed as $350,000).  Substantive changes like this are part of the Judicature Modernisation Bill.  That Bill has recently been reported out of Select Committee, which has recommended that it be passed into law.  When that might occur is difficult to predict particularly with the forthcoming election, but we note that no practical parties are attempting to block the Bill at this stage.

The changes coming into force on 1 July 2014 are welcomed.  They should provide clarity and reduce the time between filing a claim and having it heard.  This can only assist in the administration of justice.

If you would like further information about the new DCRs and how they may impact upon you, please contact Nick Gillies.

Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Employment Relations Authority and Employment Court
In our last article, we introduced the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction by discussing mediation – specifically, what mediation is and what to expect. This article discusses ...
17.04.2025 Posted in Employment
You’ve Been Served: Navigating the Use of Statutory Demands
An Introduction to Statutory Demands: A statutory demand is a legal document that is issued by a creditor (Creditor) to a debtor company (Debtor) demanding payment of a debt that is due and owing.  T...
15.04.2025 Posted in Insolvency and Restructuring
iStock  Succession Plan medium
Passing the Torch: Priming your Family Business for a Succession
As the first in a series of articles looking at the generational wealth transition and its impacts on business succession in New Zealand, Ben Hickson (partner, Corporate & Commercial) and John Kir...
07.04.2025 Posted in Corporate & Commercial & Private Wealth
Deciding to Wind Up? Observations on winding-up a trust from a recent High Court case
A trust can be a hassle and expensive to maintain.  So, it is not unusual for clients to reflect on whether a trust should be maintained. When settlors, Bert and Diana Queenin, decided to wind up the...
24.03.2025 Posted in Private Wealth
Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Mediation
Navigating the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction can be tricky. This article aims to spell out the key considerations for those involved in or contemplating mediation, which is...
24.03.2025 Posted in Employment
empty wallet finance concept
Amendment to the Crimes Act 1961: Intentionally not paying employees their wages now deemed theft
An amendment to the Crimes Act 1961 (Crimes Act) – the Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill has been passed by Parliament and received Royal assent. It is now an enforceable provision of th...
14.03.2025 Posted in Employment
Time’s Up: Late Redelivery and the Assessment of Damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company
The English Commercial Court gave an instructive judgment on the assessment of damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company; an appeal brou...
11.03.2025 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.