The Settlors’ Plan

When you set up a trust, your plans and wishes count.

Not only in the words that are written on the pages of the trust deed, but also in your plans as you express them in your memorandum of wishes and other communications with your lawyer and the trustees.

Investment of trust property will be subject to the context and objectives of the trust.  Below, I discuss the case of McLaughlin v McLaughlin[1] where the Court determined that the subdivision of trust land was part of the settlors’ plan and therefore the investment and management of the trust was undertaken prudently.

The McLaughlin case involved a trust settled by Jim and Edna McLaughlin for the benefit of themselves and their four sons.  The trust was settled in 2004 and Jim and Edna transferred to the trust a property near Nelson.  There were four sons: one (John) who was involved in the trust as trustee.  A significant family conflict developed between the brothers about the trust and its management.  Two of the sons (Mark and Andrew) were very unhappy with the way that the trust was managed and brought proceedings against their brother John and his co-trustee.

John was appointed as an initial trustee right from the formation of the trust.  The duty not to self-deal was therefore negated and he could act both as a trustee and benefit himself as a beneficiary (exercising that discretion together with his co-trustee).

The core of the claim was that the trustees had breached their fiduciary and equitable duties as:

  • They did not assess the needs and interests of the beneficiaries.
  • They did not assess alternative investment strategies.
  • They did not adopt proper decision-making processes.
  • They did not keep proper budgets and monitor financial performance.
  • They created and then allowed a conflict whereby John, as trustee, was also project manager for the property development, even though he was allegedly inexperienced.  Further, the brothers pointed to the fact that John’s own land, neighbouring and previously part of the trust block, benefitted from the development of the trust land.

The Court held the trust was set up for the overall benefit of the extended McLaughlin family as a group, but also with a specific operating framework.

The trust deed of the trust included a bespoke provision:

It is declared as the further wish of the Settlor that the Trustees shall realise the value of the farm property by way of subdivision into individual or lifestyle allotments to better benefit the discretionary beneficiaries.

The lawyer who advised on the terms of the trust gave evidence that it had been Jim and Edna’s wish to mandate the subdivision of the property.  However, the lawyer had advised against that and proposed instead the declaration of intent set out above.

There was much argument at the hearing about the phrase “to better benefit the discretionary beneficiaries”.  The Judge noted that Mark and Andrew’s view was that this meant that they should have received funds from the trust as soon as possible after their father’s death.  Whereas the Judge’s view was that the phrase would better be read as a direction to benefit to all of the beneficiaries in the fullness of time and by undertaking a careful programme of property development to extract the best value possible from the trust’s land holdings.

Other factors which supported the finding that subdivision was Jim and Edna’s intention and direction to the trustees included:

  • Jim and Edna had already assessed that the farm was not a good economic venture.
  • Jim and Edna had been pursuing a consenting and zoning programme for the land for some years.
  • Jim had given considerable thought as to how the subdivision might be undertaken.
  • Previous efforts to test the market had shown the land was not readily saleable as an undeveloped block.
  • John was chosen as trustee because he was interested in the subdivision project.  Jim also expressed his wish that the other sons not be appointed as they were not interested in the subdivision of the land.

In summary, the Court found that the subdivision was Jim and Edna’s long term plan and they established the trust for this purpose.  Jim and Edna’s direction was very clear both in the specific terms of the trust deed and the surrounding evidence.  Accordingly, it is in light of this specific direction, that the trustees’ management of the trust must be assessed.

The Court held that the approach of the trustees fitted with the plan set out by Jim and Edna as settlors.  While the trustees still had to satisfy themselves that proceeding with the subdivision is a prudent course of action, they can give Jim and Edna’s direction significant weight.  The trustees management of the trust was appropriate given the terms of the trust.

If you establish a trust with a specific plan or direction in mind, it is important that you record that plan and intent.  As your legal advisers, we can direct where best to incorporate your directions, whether in the trust deed itself, a memorandum of wishes or other document.

If you have any questions about setting up a trust, please get in touch with our Private Wealth team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.


[1] [2021] NZHC 3015.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Privacy Commissioner to consult on Privacy Rules for Biometric Information
With the increasing use of facial recognition technology (FRT), retinal scans, and voice recognition by an array of different agencies, privacy concerns about its collection and use are set to be form...
24.11.2023 Posted in Business Advice
Fern forest NZ
Bioenergy in New Zealand: Fuels for the Future?
The energy transition from combustion fuels to low carbon alternatives is viewed as critical in the race to cut global CO2 emissions and reach climate targets.  We look at some of the opportunities p...
14.11.2023 Posted in Business Advice & Climate Change & Forestry
Will Wide BW
A well drafted will is a craft
The New Zealand do-it-yourself “DIY” attitude and way of life is not limited to home improvements, but sometimes also extends to wills.  Recently we had a DIY $5.99 fill in the blanks will acros...
07.11.2023 Posted in Private Wealth
rsz large pillars
Health and Safety: The Consequences of Dishonesty
Siddhartha Gautama said that lies are like huge, gaudy vessels, the rafters of which are rotten and worm-eaten, and that those who embark in them are fated to be shipwrecked.  Two remarkable health a...
03.11.2023 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Properly sequencing your Construction Adjudications: Henry Construction Projects Ltd v Alu-Fix (UK) Ltd
According to the UK’s Technology and Construction Court (TCC) (in Henry Construction Projects Ltd v Alu-Fix (UK) Ltd [2023] EWHC 2010) valid payment claims must be paid before the underlying merits ...
30.10.2023 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Key change to rules on distribution of surplus assets under the new Incorporated Societies Act 2022
On 5 October 2023, the new Incorporated Societies Act 2022 (2022 Act) came fully into force, replacing the Incorporated Societies Act 1908 (1908 Act). One of the key requirements under the 2022 Act is...
18.10.2023 Posted in Business Advice
Construction Framework Wide BW
Major milestone passed – NZS3910:2023 expected in time to fill Christmas stockings
As the most widely adopted standard form construction contract in NZ, NZS 3910 was more than ready for updated conditions given the changes in the industry since its last review in 2013.  After almos...
09.10.2023 Posted in Construction
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.