25.02.2022

Transforming insurance law – Insurance Contracts Bill draft released for consultation

Yesterday the New Zealand Government released an exposure draft Insurance Contracts Bill.

The final Bill (once enacted) will reform our insurance contract law and consolidate and modernise existing insurance legislation (Part 3 of the Law Reform Act 1936, the Insurance Law Reform Acts of 1977 and 1985, the Insurance Intermediaries Act 1994).  The draft Bill also proposes amendments to various other pieces of legislation. 

Submissions are open until 4 May 2022. 

Why has the Bill been released?

The draft Bill has been expected since the Government agreed to a number of policy changes in November 2019.  The key policy changes for consumers include:

  • Reforming the policyholder’s duty of disclosure;
  • Removing the existing exemption for insurance contracts from the unfair contract terms provisions in the Fair Trading Act 1986; and
  • Imposing an obligation on an insurer to present policy wordings clearly.

The Government is seeking feedback on whether the proposed drafting achieves the policy intent and is workable in practice.

Key features

Notable features of the proposed reforms include:

  • A new codification of disclosure duties for consumer and non-consumer policyholders, accompanied by a schedule setting out insurers’ remedies for qualifying misrepresentations or breaches;
  • A codification of the duty of utmost good faith;
  • A new regime to govern third party claims against insurers;
  • Amendments to the Fair Trading Act 1986 to remove insurance specific exemptions from the unfair contract provisions in that Act and to clarify how the generic exemptions apply to insurance; and
  • The insertion into the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 of duties to assist policyholders to understand insurance contracts.

While the Bill does not generally extend to marine insurance, it does propose repealing several of the disclosure and warranty provisions of the Marine Insurance Act 1908, and the new Act would prevail in any case where it conflicts with the 1908 Act.

Have your say

The draft Bill is available, together with a Consultation Paper and submission templates, on the MBIE website.  We will be reviewing the draft Bill closely and will provide further general comments on our website in due course.

In the meantime, if you would like to know more about the Insurance Contracts Bill and its potential consequences for insurers and policyholders, or would like assistance with making a submission, please get in touch with our Insurance Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

UK Court of Appeal rules that that courts can order parties to engage in ADR: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416
The England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) has held that in certain circumstances, the courts can order parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or stay proceedings to allow the par...
24.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Health and Safety Tiles
Updated Guidance: IOD and WorkSafe release ‘Health and Safety Governance – A Good Practice Guide’
While we wait with bated breath for the outcome in the prosecution of former Ports of Auckland CEO, Tony Gibson, officers’ duties are very much at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Section 44 of t...
23.07.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.