3.05.2018

Update – Rent Reviews……..What Can Tenants Do?

If you wish to dispute the market rent proposed by the landlord, you may wish to consider what evidence you need to substantiate your alternative proposed market rent.

Market rent reviews are often a source of disagreement between landlords and tenants as to the level of the reviewed rent.  If you are a tenant and have received a notice from your landlord stating that the landlord wishes to increase your rent, then unless you agree with the proposed increase, the first thing to do is to obtain a copy of your lease and check the rent review provisions.

The items you should be looking for are:
(a)that you do in fact have a rent review due on the date stated by the landlord;
(b)the mechanism by which your rent is supposed to increase (it may be a market increase, based on a consumer price index formula, a fixed percentage increase, or there may be another formula for determining the increased rent) and whether the landlord has reviewed the rent using the correct method;
(c)whether your landlord has correctly served the notice.

Leases may contain restrictions preventing a notice being served either more than a certain period before the rent review date or a certain period past the rent review date.  The lease will usually state that the notice must be served in a particular manner and if the landlord has not followed that process, then the notice may not be validly served.

The most important point to remember is that if you disagree with a proposed market rent, you must act promptly.  Many leases, including the Auckland District Law Society Incorporated 6th edition deed of lease (“ADLS Lease”) contain strict time periods within which a party must respond if it wishes to dispute the proposed market rent increase.

Failure to:
(a)respond within stated time periods;
(b)follow the correct method for service of the notice; or
(c)include all the required information;could result in the tenant being required to pay the market rent proposed by the landlord until the next rent review.  This is regardless of whether the tenant agrees that the proposed rent is a fair assessment of the market rent.  This result can be compounded if the lease contains a ratchet clause preventing the rent from decreasing, as it could mean an artificially high rent might still continue to be payable even after a further rent review.

If you wish to dispute the market rent proposed by the landlord, you may wish to consider what evidence you need to substantiate your alternative proposed market rent.  The ADLS Lease provides that if you give notice disputing the rent proposed by the landlord, you must also specify in that notice the rent you propose as the current market rent.  The ADLS Lease also contains interim rent provisions which mean that increased rent might still be payable while the disagreement around current market rent is resolved.  Various scenarios apply depending on whether each party provides a registered valuer’s certificate substantiating their proposed market rent.

A lease should also provide a formula or mechanism by which the landlord and tenant will resolve any dispute as to the new rent.  The ADLS Lease provides that the parties will endeavour to agree upon the current market rent, but if agreement cannot be reached within 10 working days then the parties can either choose to have the reviewed rent determined by arbitration or by registered valuers acting as experts, with a third expert appointed to determine the market rent if the two valuers cannot agree.

If the landlord is undertaking a rent review after the rent review date has passed, it is also worthwhile for a tenant to carefully check the provisions of their lease relating to backdating.  The ADLS Lease contains a provision that if the notice is served more than three months after the rent review date, the new rent (once determined) can only be backdated to the date of service of the notice.  Other forms of lease may also contain restrictions on backdating.

The most important point to remember is that upon receiving a notice from the landlord with regards to a rent review, a tenant needs to act promptly and not ignore such notice.  Failure to do so within a specified timeframe or in a specified manner may mean a tenant loses its right to challenge the proposed new rent.  This could have significant ongoing financial consequences.

In deciding how to respond to the landlord, we recommend that a tenant always carefully reads the rent review provisions in their lease to make sure that they are aware of, and comply with any mechanism set out for both responding to the landlord’s notice and for determining any disagreement as to the new rent.  If a tenant is in any doubt, we would recommend they consult with their lawyer at the earliest opportunity.

Want to know more?

Please contact the Property team at Hesketh Henry on 09 375 8700

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Clarity on Liquidated Damages following Termination
The United Kingdom Supreme Court in Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd [2021] UKSC 29 has clarified the operation of liquidated damages clauses in the event of termination.  The dec...
Is your will in draft form?  High Court refuses to exercise its discretionary power to validate a draft will notwithstanding beneficiaries’ consent
The High Court’s recent decision in Re: An application to validate the will of Olive Ruby Piper [2021] NZHC 534 serves as a valuable reminder to make sure that your estate planning documents are...
16.09.2021 Posted in Family & Trust Wills Estates
New Fair Trading Act provisions spark need to review small trade contracts
The Fair Trading Amendment Bill received Royal Assent on 16 August 2021 and is now the Fair Trading Amendment Act 2021 (Amendment Act).  The Amendment Act amends the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA), with...
Employment Relations Authority Finds Dismissal of Unvaccinated Border Worker to be Justified
On 1 September 2021, The Employment Relations Authority (Authority) determined in GF v New Zealand Customs Service [2021] NZERA 382, that the New Zealand Customs Service (Customs) was justified in its...
10.09.2021 Posted in Business Advice & COVID-19 & Employment
AML/CFT guidance with the High Court’s decision in Reserve Bank of New Zealand and TSB Bank Limited
On 31 August 2021, the High Court of Wellington released its decision on the Reserve Bank of New Zealand v TSB Bank Limited.
09.09.2021 Posted in AML/CFT & Banking and Finance
Supreme Court asserts Employment Relations Authority exclusive jurisdiction
The Supreme Court has recently issued a significant judgment clarifying that the Employment Relations Authority (Authority) has exclusive jurisdiction over claims arising in a “work context”. In d...
09.09.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment
How much does one truly deserve?
A critical analysis of the New Zealand and Australian High Courts' approach to quantum meruit claims within the construction industry
06.09.2021 Posted in Construction & Regulatory
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->