9.05.2018

Young v Tower Insurance Ltd [2016] NZHC 2956

This judgment of Gendall J introduced a new principle of insurance law: the proposition that a mutual contractual duty of good faith is implied in every insurance contract and that damages may be awarded for a breach of that duty.

The plaintiffs (the trustees of the Young trust) owned a residential property in the Christchurch hills insured by Tower Insurance Ltd (“Tower”).  The property suffered significant damage as result of the Canterbury earthquake sequence in 2010 and 2011 and claims were lodged accordingly.

The central issue for the Court to consider was whether the property could be repaired to the standard required under the insurance policy, or whether it needed to be rebuilt. However, the plaintiffs also alleged that Tower had failed to act in good faith, and sought general and exemplary damages.

Having noted that insurance is a contract of utmost good faith, and Tower’s agreement to be bound by the Fair Insurance Code 2016, Gendall J held that a contractual duty of good faith is implied into every insurance contract, and is a duty that flows both ways.

While he declined to define the full scope and limits of the duty, the judge found that, as a bare minimum, the duty requires an insurer to:

  1. Disclose all material information that the insurer knows or ought to have known. This duty includes, but is not limited to, the initial formation of the contract and arises during and after the lodgement of a claim.
  2. Act reasonably, fairly and transparently. Again, the duty includes, but is not limited to, the initial formation of the contract, and arises during and after lodgement of a claim.
  3. Process a claim in reasonable time. This obligation must take into account the time required properly to investigate and assess all aspects of the claim.  What is “reasonable” will depend on the circumstances, which may include the type of insurance policy, the size and complexity of a claim, compliance with any relevant regulatory parameters, and factors outside the insurer’s control.

Importantly, an insurer will not breach the implied term by failing to pay a claim during a dispute (provided there are reasonable grounds for that dispute).  However, Gendall J noted that the conduct of the insurer in handling the claim will be relevant when deciding whether the duty of good faith has been breached.

The Judge held that Tower breached its duty by failing to provide an early report that recommended a rebuild of the house (despite that report being superseded by later assessments).  The report had been provided to Tower’s claims processing agent early in the claims process and was not passed on to Tower until later. The failure to provide the report made little difference to the outcome of events, and the plaintiff was awarded nominal (general) damages of $5,000.  Exemplary damages were not available for a contractual breach, and, in any event, were not justified by the insurer’s behaviour.

The Judge’s ruling that a general contractual duty of good faith is implied in every insurance contract is a new development in New Zealand insurance law, and the parameters of that duty have yet to be defined.  It is important to note that the duty is mutual.  The plaintiffs’ own conduct attracted criticism from the Judge and adversely affected some of their claims.

Return to Summary Table

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Updated Subcontract Agreement: SA-2017
The SA-2009 form of Subcontract Agreement is commonly used in the construction industry. It has undergone a review and a new SA-2017 form has been produced.
3.07.2018 Posted in Construction Law & Health & Safety Law
Distribution Agreements – 6 Key Considerations
While the exact nature and terms of a distribution agreement will vary between industries and jurisdictions, these 6 issues will always be important.
28.06.2018 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
Continued Importance of IP Protection for Manufacturers
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has recently released a report which identified key trends and challenges for the manufacturing sector (that report can be accessed here). Th...
28.06.2018 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
CONSTRUCTION LAW UPDATE – JUNE 2018
Recent Construction Law Decisions and Developments in New Zealand
18.06.2018 Posted in Construction Law
Updated Standard Consultancy Agreements
Two of the most commonly used standard agreements to engage consultants are the ACENZ / Engineering New Zealand (formerly IPENZ) Short Form Agreement (“SFA”) and the Conditions of Contract for Consultancy Services (“CCCS”).
5.06.2018 Posted in Construction Law
Managing Employees’ Mental Health Issues
Ministry of Health statistics confirm that during 2016, 169,454 people accessed mental health services in New Zealand. The law of averages suggests that most workplaces will – to a lesser or greater degree – be affected at some time by an employee’s mental health issue.
31.05.2018 Posted in Employment Law & Health & Safety Law
Managing Medical Incapacity: Enough To Make You Feel Sick?
Managers and HR practitioners often tell us that dealing with employees who are genuinely too sick or injured to work is one of their least favourite tasks. Frankly, we can see why.
31.05.2018 Posted in Employment Law
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.