9.05.2018

Abandonment of Employment: wish you were here…

When an employee leaves work in dramatic fashion, it is important (from both a legal and practical perspective) to try and clarify the employee's intentions, so you all know where you stand.

What should you do when your employee is missing in action?  How do you handle the employee who just doesn’t turn up?  Has your employee abandoned employment?

This seems to happen more often than you would expect – and in some industries, it is not at all uncommon.  There are at least two potential legal issues here:

  • The first is the possibility that the employee has abandoned employment and you don’t know where the employee is (in military parlance, MIA).
  • The second is that the employee fully intends to return to work, but has taken unauthorised leave (has gone AWOL).

While the practical consequences may potentially be the same (i.e. the employee ends up with no job) the legal situation and the process is a bit different in each case.

Abandonment occurs when employees abandon the job – in other words, they walk away from the job, with no intention of returning.  In some situations this can be clearer than in others – for example, an employee may clear out his desk, throw around a few expletives, and slam the door on his way out.  Other times, an employee simply doesn’t turn up, and no-one knows where he is.

Abandonment does not include a situation where an employer knows where an employee is or why the employee is not at work, regardless of whether that absence is authorised or not.

When an employee leaves work in dramatic fashion, it is important (from both a legal and practical perspective) to try and clarify the employee’s intentions, so you all know where you stand.  However, you do need to tread with caution.  If the drama is the result of a work altercation, particularly with a supervisor or manager, pushing the employee for a clear and concise explanation at the time may inadvertently result in a constructive dismissal.  Do they just need some ‘cooling off’ time?  Quite possibly, so leaving some time before finding out if the employee is resigning, and if so, whether the employee intends to give notice, would be prudent.  If an employee makes it clear that she is resigning, but no notice is given, does she understand that she will be breaching her employment agreement by not giving notice?  Does the employee understand she will not be paid beyond the last day of work?

If the employee makes it clear that she is resigning, at least you all know where you stand.  If the employee was just venting some steam, then again, at least intentions are clarified (although there may be consequences for any diva-like behaviour in the workplace).

If, on the other hand, an employee simply hasn’t turned up, as an employer, you may be in a bit of a quandary.  Don’t jump to conclusions.  Despite what the employment agreement might say about employment being abandoned after some days, you cannot just sit on your hands and wait for the stated time to elapse.  Rather, you must try and contact the employee by whatever means possible – call the employee’s mobile and home phone, leave messages, text, email, contact a next of kin, or even visit the employee’s home address (if practicable).

If the employee can’t be contacted over a period of several days, it would be appropriate to courier or deliver a letter to the employee’s home address, setting out your concern that he may have abandoned employment, and asking him to make contact urgently by a particular date or it may be concluded that the employee has abandoned employment.  If he still hasn’t made contact by the stated date, and investigations have failed to locate him, you can then send a letter confirming that the employee has been treated as abandoning employment, and referencing the abandonment clause in the employment agreement.  He should be paid any final pay (including holiday pay) owing, and the letter should confirm this.

If you do manage to make contact with an errant employee (before the abandonment axe drops) or the employee just turns up to work after several days of no contact, this is not an abandonment situation.  Rather, you have a situation where the employee has potentially committed misconduct by taking unauthorised leave.  This should be handled in the same way as any other suspected misconduct – putting the allegations and evidence/information to the employee, advising of the possible consequences, inviting the employee to respond to the allegations in a formal disciplinary meeting, considering the response, and reaching a conclusion on whether the employee has indeed taken unauthorised leave, and whether this amounts to misconduct or serious misconduct in all the particular circumstances.  The next step is to advise the employee that you need to consider the appropriate sanction (e.g. dismissal or a formal warning), give the employee an opportunity to comment on this, and make a decision.

As with any disciplinary action, the question is whether the employer’s action, and how the employer acted, was what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances.   The ‘seriousness’ of a failure to turn up to work will vary, depending on many factors – whether this is the first time, the company culture, the employee’s reasons for not showing, the company’s procedures for notifying absence, and so on.  There is no ‘one size fits all’.

If you are in any doubt about whether your employee is MIA, AWOL (or just being a P in the A!), feel free to give us a call for clarification and advice.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Clarity on Liquidated Damages following Termination
The United Kingdom Supreme Court in Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd [2021] UKSC 29 has clarified the operation of liquidated damages clauses in the event of termination.  The dec...
Is your will in draft form?  High Court refuses to exercise its discretionary power to validate a draft will notwithstanding beneficiaries’ consent
The High Court’s recent decision in Re: An application to validate the will of Olive Ruby Piper [2021] NZHC 534 serves as a valuable reminder to make sure that your estate planning documents are...
16.09.2021 Posted in Family & Trust Wills Estates
New Fair Trading Act provisions spark need to review small trade contracts
The Fair Trading Amendment Bill received Royal Assent on 16 August 2021 and is now the Fair Trading Amendment Act 2021 (Amendment Act).  The Amendment Act amends the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA), with...
Employment Relations Authority Finds Dismissal of Unvaccinated Border Worker to be Justified
On 1 September 2021, The Employment Relations Authority (Authority) determined in GF v New Zealand Customs Service [2021] NZERA 382, that the New Zealand Customs Service (Customs) was justified in its...
10.09.2021 Posted in Business Advice & COVID-19 & Employment
AML/CFT guidance with the High Court’s decision in Reserve Bank of New Zealand and TSB Bank Limited
On 31 August 2021, the High Court of Wellington released its decision on the Reserve Bank of New Zealand v TSB Bank Limited.
09.09.2021 Posted in AML/CFT & Banking and Finance
Supreme Court asserts Employment Relations Authority exclusive jurisdiction
The Supreme Court has recently issued a significant judgment clarifying that the Employment Relations Authority (Authority) has exclusive jurisdiction over claims arising in a “work context”. In d...
09.09.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment
How much does one truly deserve?
A critical analysis of the New Zealand and Australian High Courts' approach to quantum meruit claims within the construction industry
06.09.2021 Posted in Construction & Regulatory
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->