25.03.2024

Forestry: Regulatory Roundup March 2024

The challenging economic environment for New Zealand’s forestry industry continues, with China’s demand for our logs remaining subdued.

Moreover, in addition to the change in Government, there have been a number of regulatory changes affecting the industry over the past year.  Our Forestry Team recap three recent key changes.

  1. Plantation Forestry Standards Update
    (in force 3 November 2023)

Perhaps the most significant reform was the introduction of the National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry (NES-CF), which replaces the previous National Environmental Standards for Plantation Forestry (NES-PF).  This is the country’s primary tool for managing the environmental effects of plantation forestry.

The key changes include:

  • The inclusion into the standards of exotic continuous cover forests (carbon forests) in addition to exotic and indigenous planation forests.
  • Increased powers for local governments.
  • Major changes to slash management.
  • Requirement for foresters to have management plans.

Under NES-CF, councils now have more power to determine where forests are located when granting afforestation consents. The new regulations give councils the ability to consider erosion risk, slash risk, the effect on ecosystems and freshwater, and other social and economic effects before granting consent. This is intended to address concerns around the conversion of farmland into forestry and the associated effects on the environment.

Carbon forests are now in! This means forests planted for the sole purpose of earning carbon credits are now within the ambit of the rules applying to normal plantation forests. Carbon forests will now face the same requirements around management and consent, including for sub-activities like stream crossings, sediment loss, and access track drainage.

Management plans are now required for all afforestation activities.

An increased focus on slash management at harvest means that when operating in areas with a high risk of erosion (designated as red or orange zones), solid wood slash that is longer than 2 metres (i.e., slash over 2 metres that can be moved without breaking or degrading) must be removed if it is safe to do so.

  1. The Crackdown on Illegally Harvested Timber
    (in force May 2026)

The Forests (Legal Harvest Assurance) Amendment Act 2023 (Act) was enacted on 19 May 2023 and aims to strengthen the crackdown on illegally harvested timber products in the industry.  Forest owners, primary processors, log traders, and timber exporters will need to provide assurance that their timber has been legally harvested or sourced from legally harvested timber.

The Act will introduce a government assurance framework to ensure that all the timber products traded from New Zealand are harvested legally and that illegally harvested timber products are prevented from making it to New Zealand shores. This keeps New Zealand in line with steps we are seeing globally from the likes of Australia, the United States, and the European Union.

The Act will commence in 2026, and a further 12 months will be allowed for compliance.

  1. Cyclone and Flooding Extensions are Available for ETS Replanting Timelines
    (in force September 2023)

Following cyclones Hale and Gabrielle in 2023, many New Zealand forests were at risk of being considered ‘deforested’ by the Emissions Trading Scheme, resulting in a technical liability to surrender units.

In September 2023, by an Order in Council under the Severe Weather Emergency Recovery Legislation Act 2023, forest owners were granted a replanting extension.  This allowed for more time to replant forest on land affected by certain weather events of 2023. This means that the land will not be considered deforested if re-establishment has been delayed by the weather.   Forest owners affected by these weather events may apply for a 3-year extension on their 4-year and 10-year re-establishment tests, i.e., extend the 4-year re-establishment criteria to the 7th year, and the 10-year re-establishment criteria to the 13th year.

The 3-year extension also applies to forests established to offset carbon in pre-1990 forest land and the particular ‘offset date’ accompanying that.

Forest owners wanting to apply for the extension should submit a statutory declaration either:

  • Before the new extended date for re-establishing the forest (i.e., the relevant test plus 3 years) or before/on the day they submit their emissions return, or  
  • Before the new offset date or before or on the day they submit their P90 release criteria notice.

If you have any questions about the changes in the forestry regulations, please get in touch with Ben Hickson or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Are trustees bound to relationship property agreements?
In Rawson v Prescott [2024] NZHC 1919, the High Court addressed a dispute involving trust property and a relationship property agreement. Mr RR, trustee of the GR Family Trust, sought summary judgment...
10.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
shutterstock
Bowen case part 1 – blowing the whistle
You may have heard of the term ‘whistleblowing’, but have you heard of ‘protected disclosures’? Protected disclosures are a creature of the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers)...
10.09.2024 Posted in Employment
Construction theme black and white
Contractors take note – are any of your retentions clauses prohibited provisions?
In Stevensons Structural Engineers 1978 Ltd (in liq) v McMillan & Lockwood (PN) Ltd & Anor [2024] NZHC 2415, the High Court held that the timing for payment out of retentions in certain subcon...
05.09.2024 Posted in Construction
Avoiding the Grey Area: Interpreting Trust Beneficiary Classes
Beneficiary classes in trust deeds should be clearly defined to ensure the assets of the trust benefit the people who the settlor(s) of the trust originally intended.   If they are not, then disputes...
05.09.2024 Posted in Private Wealth
vecteezy square wooden blocks lined up on a wooden workbench  Insurance Icons centered
Hesketh Henry’s Insurance Team author LexisNexis Practical Guidance Insurance
Hesketh Henry’s Insurance Team is delighted to celebrate the launch of Practical Guidance Insurance. LexisNexis has launched Practical Guidance Insurance containing 12 topics and over 50 sub-topics ...
03.09.2024 Posted in Insurance
Contract dictionary
Is ‘close enough’ OK? Reasonable endeavours to overcome a force majeure event
The English Supreme Court’s decision in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV [2024] UKSC 18 has demonstrated the effect sanctions may have on a contract as a force majeure event and clarified the parameters of...
03.09.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
The useful Mackay v Dick principle is part of English law – might it apply here?
The useful Mackay v Dick principle is part of English law – might it apply here? In King Crude Carriers S.A. & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors, the English and Wales Court of Appeal confi...
03.09.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.