9.05.2018

Here we go again…the next steps towards the new health and safety legislation

After some 16 months of consideration, 226 submissions, and 2 extensions, the Transport and Industrial Relations Select Committee has finally released its report on the Health and Safety Reform Bill.

Based on the reactions in the media, you’d think the Select Committee had undertaken a dramatic rewrite of the Bill since we last saw it in March 2014.  So what has the Committee actually changed?  Answer: not a great deal – we discuss the key changes below.

Health and safety representatives and committees

Small businesses with fewer than 20 employees, in low-risk sectors, will not be required to have a health and safety representative or committee, even if workers request them.  Of course, there is nothing stopping such businesses from voluntarily having such representatives or committees if they so desire.

Whether a business is in a “low-risk” sector will depend upon detailed regulations that the Minister for Workplace Relations has indicated will not be finalised until the Bill comes into force.

This has been perhaps the most controversial change – the Government insisting that this provides “flexibility” while the Opposition has referred to it as “ripping the guts out of the Bill”.  We note that whether or not a PCBU (a “Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking”) is required to elect a health and safety representative or have a committee, all PCBUs will have a duty to engage with their workers on matters of health and safety.

Officers’ duties

The definition of “Officer” (i.e. those individuals within a PCBU who owe due diligence obligations) has been narrowed.

Other than named persons holding specific roles in a PCBU (i.e. directors or partners), Officers’ duties are confined to those who “exercise significant influence over the management of the business or undertaking”.

The classic example (and that given in the Bill itself) is a CEO.  However, those individuals who “merely advise or make recommendations” to Officers of a PCBU are not Officers themselves.

The Government has also indicated that it intends to make a change to the Bill to make clear that the extent of an Officer’s duty takes into account the nature of the PCBU, the position of the Officer, and the nature of their responsibilities.

Volunteers

The Committee has made significant changes to the volunteer provisions of the Bill to bring it back in line with the existing Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992.

In essence, a PCBU owes the primary duty to ensure the health and safety of its workers and others, so far as reasonably practicable.  A volunteer association, which is where volunteers work together for community purposes and does not have any employees, is not a PCBU.

If a volunteer association has employees, then it is a PCBU.  However, the Bill now distinguishes between “casual volunteers” and “volunteer workers” in this situation:

  • “Volunteer workers” are those who regularly work for a PCBU with its knowledge and consent, and are integral to the PCBU’s operations.  The PCBU owes the primary duty to volunteer workers as if they were any other worker.
  • “Casual volunteers” are those who do not fall within the definition of volunteer workers.  Specific examples include (but are not limited to) participating in a fundraising activity, assisting with sports or recreation clubs, assisting with activities of an educational institution outside that institution’s premises, and providing care for another person in the volunteer’s home. The health and safety of these volunteers will be covered by the PCBU’s duty to other persons affected by the work of the PCBU.

Corporate manslaughter

There had been a lot of press in recent weeks about a potential corporate manslaughter offence being included in the Bill.  Despite the chatter, this has not come to fruition.

What happens next?

The (amended) Bill will now go back to Parliament for consideration in the coming weeks.  The changes made by the Select Committee have come at a price – the Opposition parties have now signalled they will oppose the Bill and seek to introduce amendments of their own.

Some further amendments are guaranteed – the Government has stated it intends to make certain changes, and the Opposition have already released some of their own proposals.  What we do know is that everything is to come into force before 31 October 2017.

We’re sure to be hearing a lot more about this Bill in the coming weeks and months – so watch this space!

If you want to read our previous articles about the Bill, click below:

Safety – Get Your Employees Involved!
New Workplace Health and Safety Legislation
Health and Safety Reform Bill – Risks You Need To Know About
Health and Safety Changes – Directors Need To Act Now!

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen, goodbye…
When the employment relationship comes to an end, for whatever reason, there are still a few boxes to be ticked. So what needs to be done before you can bid each other a (hopefully) fond farewell?
5.11.2018 Posted in Employment Law
WorkSafe v Athenberry Holdings Ltd: The Competent Contractor?
Defining health and safety duties in a contracting situation is rarely straightforward.
1.11.2018 Posted in Health & Safety Law
Managing Partner Honoured with German Award
Erich Bachmann, the Managing Partner of Auckland based commercial law firm Hesketh Henry, has been awarded the Cross of the Order of Merit with Ribbon of the Federal Republic of Germany (Verdienstkreu...
30.10.2018
Building and Construction Law Journal
Construction partner, Nick Gillies, has been published in the latest Building and Construction Law Journal ((2018) 34 BCL 179).
18.10.2018 Posted in Construction Law
EBERT CONSTRUCTION: RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION
Introduction Following our Initial Note, the receivers of Ebert Construction Ltd (Ebert) released their first report on 1 October 2018.  Then, on 3 October 2018, Ebert put itself into liquidation, wi...
Pruning Back Liability: Do Contractual Arrangements Hold the Key?
The first defended hearing under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA), WorkSafe v Athenberry Holdings Ltd, required the District Court to consider the ability of a business (a PCBU) to influe...
9.10.2018 Posted in Health & Safety Law
Negotiating The Best Incentives For Korean Companies
Hesketh Henry Special Counsel, Hak Jun Lee  recently presented at the 2018 IAKL conference on “ Negotiating the best incentives for Korean companies “. The topic included:  Current trends f...
9.10.2018 Posted in Foreign Investment
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.