9.05.2018

Here we go again…the next steps towards the new health and safety legislation

After some 16 months of consideration, 226 submissions, and 2 extensions, the Transport and Industrial Relations Select Committee has finally released its report on the Health and Safety Reform Bill.

Based on the reactions in the media, you’d think the Select Committee had undertaken a dramatic rewrite of the Bill since we last saw it in March 2014.  So what has the Committee actually changed?  Answer: not a great deal – we discuss the key changes below.

Health and safety representatives and committees

Small businesses with fewer than 20 employees, in low-risk sectors, will not be required to have a health and safety representative or committee, even if workers request them.  Of course, there is nothing stopping such businesses from voluntarily having such representatives or committees if they so desire.

Whether a business is in a “low-risk” sector will depend upon detailed regulations that the Minister for Workplace Relations has indicated will not be finalised until the Bill comes into force.

This has been perhaps the most controversial change – the Government insisting that this provides “flexibility” while the Opposition has referred to it as “ripping the guts out of the Bill”.  We note that whether or not a PCBU (a “Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking”) is required to elect a health and safety representative or have a committee, all PCBUs will have a duty to engage with their workers on matters of health and safety.

Officers’ duties

The definition of “Officer” (i.e. those individuals within a PCBU who owe due diligence obligations) has been narrowed.

Other than named persons holding specific roles in a PCBU (i.e. directors or partners), Officers’ duties are confined to those who “exercise significant influence over the management of the business or undertaking”.

The classic example (and that given in the Bill itself) is a CEO.  However, those individuals who “merely advise or make recommendations” to Officers of a PCBU are not Officers themselves.

The Government has also indicated that it intends to make a change to the Bill to make clear that the extent of an Officer’s duty takes into account the nature of the PCBU, the position of the Officer, and the nature of their responsibilities.

Volunteers

The Committee has made significant changes to the volunteer provisions of the Bill to bring it back in line with the existing Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992.

In essence, a PCBU owes the primary duty to ensure the health and safety of its workers and others, so far as reasonably practicable.  A volunteer association, which is where volunteers work together for community purposes and does not have any employees, is not a PCBU.

If a volunteer association has employees, then it is a PCBU.  However, the Bill now distinguishes between “casual volunteers” and “volunteer workers” in this situation:

  • “Volunteer workers” are those who regularly work for a PCBU with its knowledge and consent, and are integral to the PCBU’s operations.  The PCBU owes the primary duty to volunteer workers as if they were any other worker.
  • “Casual volunteers” are those who do not fall within the definition of volunteer workers.  Specific examples include (but are not limited to) participating in a fundraising activity, assisting with sports or recreation clubs, assisting with activities of an educational institution outside that institution’s premises, and providing care for another person in the volunteer’s home. The health and safety of these volunteers will be covered by the PCBU’s duty to other persons affected by the work of the PCBU.

Corporate manslaughter

There had been a lot of press in recent weeks about a potential corporate manslaughter offence being included in the Bill.  Despite the chatter, this has not come to fruition.

What happens next?

The (amended) Bill will now go back to Parliament for consideration in the coming weeks.  The changes made by the Select Committee have come at a price – the Opposition parties have now signalled they will oppose the Bill and seek to introduce amendments of their own.

Some further amendments are guaranteed – the Government has stated it intends to make certain changes, and the Opposition have already released some of their own proposals.  What we do know is that everything is to come into force before 31 October 2017.

We’re sure to be hearing a lot more about this Bill in the coming weeks and months – so watch this space!

If you want to read our previous articles about the Bill, click below:

Safety – Get Your Employees Involved!
New Workplace Health and Safety Legislation
Health and Safety Reform Bill – Risks You Need To Know About
Health and Safety Changes – Directors Need To Act Now!

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry_100x100 1
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Updated Subcontract Agreement: SA-2017
The SA-2009 form of Subcontract Agreement is commonly used in the construction industry. It has undergone a review and a new SA-2017 form has been produced.
3.07.2018 Posted in Construction Law & Health & Safety Law
Distribution Agreements – 6 Key Considerations
While the exact nature and terms of a distribution agreement will vary between industries and jurisdictions, these 6 issues will always be important.
28.06.2018 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
Continued Importance of IP Protection for Manufacturers
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has recently released a report which identified key trends and challenges for the manufacturing sector (that report can be accessed here). Th...
28.06.2018 Posted in Corporate & Commercial law
CONSTRUCTION LAW UPDATE – JUNE 2018
Recent Construction Law Decisions and Developments in New Zealand
18.06.2018 Posted in Construction Law
Updated Standard Consultancy Agreements
Two of the most commonly used standard agreements to engage consultants are the ACENZ / Engineering New Zealand (formerly IPENZ) Short Form Agreement (“SFA”) and the Conditions of Contract for Consultancy Services (“CCCS”).
5.06.2018 Posted in Construction Law
Managing Employees’ Mental Health Issues
Ministry of Health statistics confirm that during 2016, 169,454 people accessed mental health services in New Zealand. The law of averages suggests that most workplaces will – to a lesser or greater degree – be affected at some time by an employee’s mental health issue.
31.05.2018 Posted in Employment Law & Health & Safety Law
Managing Medical Incapacity: Enough To Make You Feel Sick?
Managers and HR practitioners often tell us that dealing with employees who are genuinely too sick or injured to work is one of their least favourite tasks. Frankly, we can see why.
31.05.2018 Posted in Employment Law
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.