03.07.2017

Holidays Act: Help has arrived!

We are thrilled to announce that the first part of Holidays Act 2003: Guidance on annual holidays and related provisions has now been published

We all know that payroll compliance can be a nightmare. Automated systems don’t necessarily fit individual situations, employee work patterns don’t always fit the mould, and this is overlaid with a very technical area of the law. And to make matters worse; maths!

In particular, we know that many companies have had difficulty complying with the Holidays Act 2003. Numerous companies have been caught out in Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) audits, including government agencies, and even MBIE itself.

Frighteningly (for us at least) many of the problems that have been identified were not difficulties with the interpretation of the law but just a misapplication of it where the law is actually quite clear. That said, there are some particularly difficult parts of the Holidays Act that require careful consideration.

Over the last year or so, Employment New Zealand (a team within MBIE) has brought together a team of professional service providers, payroll experts and other stakeholders to try and develop guidance for employers on interpreting and implementing the Holidays Act. Our very own Jim Roberts has been a part of this working group.

We are thrilled to announce that the first part of Holidays Act 2003: Guidance on annual holidays and related provisions has now been published on MBIE’s Employment website, and is available for your use.

This document deals with Annual Holiday entitlements, including what entitlements are available, when, and how to pay them. It sets out Key Messages for Employers, Employees and Professional Services Providers, and Key Steps for reducing the Risk of non-compliance.

It also has definitions of important terms in the Holidays Act, examples of scenarios throughout, and an Appendix with more detailed scenarios. If you are struggling with the beast that is compliance, and looking for detailed assistance, this will definitely help you out.

There are still issues that require advice but these have, hopefully, been reduced by the information in these guidelines.

If you identify issues, have questions, or just want to run a specific query by us, please feel free to contact us.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Plan fail results in health and safety conviction
Deliver the health and safety work you promise, or there may be legal consequences – as a health and safety consultancy recently learnt! Earlier this year, WorkSafe prosecuted Safe Business Solution...
25.10.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Contract stock edit e
Rent reviews
As a tenant or landlord under a commercial lease, your business will be affected by rent reviews during the life of your lease.  Therefore, it is essential that you understand the most common types o...
24.10.2024 Posted in Property
Serious misconduct – how serious does the conduct have to be?
What is serious misconduct, and when and how can an employer bring an employee’s employment to an end on these grounds?
23.10.2024 Posted in Employment
iStock  Construction dpi
“More than an opinion”: criminal liability arising from PS4 producer statements under the Building Act 2004
In Solicitor-General’s Reference (No 1 of 2022) from CRI-2021-463-55 ([2022] NZHC 556) [2024] NZCA 514 the Court of Appeal was asked to consider the following question: Was the Court correct to find...
15.10.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Close call on contribution: Beca decision confirms 10-year longstop does not bar contribution claims
In a 3-2 split decision, the Supreme Court in Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd v Wellington City Council [2024] NZSC 117 confirmed that contribution claims are not barred by the Building Act 2004...
11.10.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes & Insurance
Business man document
Addressing directors’ personal safety
The Companies Act 1993 (CA93) currently requires all company directors to make their residential addresses available as a matter of public record.  However, in recent times, incidents of stalking and...
Wielding the Secateurs: The High Court’s Pruning of Potentially Disruptive Decisions
Every now and then courts have to self-correct to prevent errant off-shoots of legal reasoning advancing into the law.  In the decision, IAG New Zealand Ltd v Degen [2024] NZHC 397, the High Court t...
19.09.2024 Posted in Insurance
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.