28.10.2015

Is Your Home Held in a Family Trust? – The New Tax Changes Affect You!

The Government’s announced law changes dealing with taxation of property came into effect on 1 October 2015 and will have a significant impact on all property owners who hold their family home in a trust.

The reason for this is that the exemption from providing tax information on the sale of main homes does not apply to residential homes owned or being bought by family trusts.  This change could have a serious impact on people who own or wish to own their home in a family trust.  Family trusts which do not carry on any taxable activity (like earning rental income) are unlikely to currently have an IRD number.

For all agreements for sale and purchase entered into after 1 October 2015, vendors who hold or purchasers who intend to purchase the property in a family trust will need to provide a tax statement to their lawyer (which includes the trust’s IRD number) before the property can be transferred and settlement takes place.

There are serious consequences for a vendor trust or purchaser trust if they are unable to settle on the agreed settlement date due to the lack of an IRD number.  Agreements for sale and purchase set out these penalties in more detail however this usually includes paying penalty interest per day if settlement is delayed, often at a rate of 12-14% per annum.

IRD advise that an application for an IRD number is likely to take between 8 to 10 working days, however, they require certain information to be included with the application and it may take vendors and purchasers additional time to collate this information.  Information required to be submitted with an IRD application include a copy of the trust deed, a copy of any deed of retirement and appointment of trustees if trustees have changed, and each of the trustees’ IRD numbers.

If you own or intend to purchase your home in a family trust we strongly recommend that you obtain an IRD number for your trust well in advance of buying or selling property to avoid the unnecessary stress and potential penalties that may result from not having a trust IRD number on settlement date.

Another consideration for family trusts is how the main home exclusion to the much publicised bright-line test will apply to trusts.  Until this legislation is passed, we would recommend caution be applied if homeowners wish to transfer their existing family home into a trust, or else restructure ownership from one family trust to another, to avoid the possibility that after restructuring the family home will not satisfy all the requirements for the main home exclusion to apply.

If you would like more information about the property tax changes discussed in this article, or have any other property law questions, please contact us on 09 3758700 or email lawyers@heskethhenry.co.nz

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Deciding to Wind Up? Observations on winding-up a trust from a recent High Court case
A trust can be a hassle and expensive to maintain.  So, it is not unusual for clients to reflect on whether a trust should be maintained. When settlors, Bert and Diana Queenin, decided to wind up the...
24.03.2025 Posted in Private Wealth
Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Mediation
Navigating the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction can be tricky. This article aims to spell out the key considerations for those involved in or contemplating mediation, which is...
24.03.2025 Posted in Employment
empty wallet finance concept
Amendment to the Crimes Act 1961: Intentionally not paying employees their wages now deemed theft
An amendment to the Crimes Act 1961 (Crimes Act) – the Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill has been passed by Parliament and received Royal assent. It is now an enforceable provision of th...
14.03.2025 Posted in Employment
Time’s Up: Late Redelivery and the Assessment of Damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company
The English Commercial Court gave an instructive judgment on the assessment of damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company; an appeal brou...
11.03.2025 Posted in Trade and Transport
Team Hands in small
Cartel conduct: Do not pass “GO”, go directly to jail
Until 8 April 2021, cartel conduct was punishable only by civil penalty in New Zealand.  In R v Kumar [2024] NZHC 3955 the High Court imposed the first criminal convictions and sentences for cartel c...
06.03.2025 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Employment
2025 Insights: Proposed Legislative Changes and Employment Team Update
Team update and proposed legislative change – hello from the Hesketh Henry Employment Law Team 2025. Click here
20.02.2025
photo  dbe
When Sweet Turns Sour: The Costly Consequences of Contamination
The New Zealand Sugar Company (NZSC), trading as Chelsea Sugar, recently found itself in hot water after being fined nearly $149,500 by the District Court due to a prosecution brought by the Ministry ...
19.02.2025 Posted in Insurance & Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.