07.11.2013

Job Application Forms and Questions – Have you been sterilised?

A job application form seems so simple, however they can be harder to make legally compliant than you might think.

In the Media

An extreme example recently reported by Fairfax Media was a series of ‘traumatic’ questions Chevron Australia was asking job applicants.  The questions included:

  • Details of sexually transmitted diseases;
  • What the date of the applicant’s last period was;
  • Whether the applicant had ever been pregnant and, if so, how many times;
  • How many abortions and stillborn children the applicant had had;
  • How many “normal” children had been born;
  • Whether the applicant or the applicant’s partner had been sterilised;
  • Whether the applicant and partner have tried for at least 12 months to conceive a child; and
  • Whether a physician has ever told the applicant or the applicant’s partner that either one of them has a medical condition that prevents having a child.

When challenged, the company’s initial response was that the medical documents were guided by industry standards to ensure that staff were safe and fit to work, and that they were lawful.  It denied that candidates who met the requirements of a position were discriminated against based on medical history.

The article reported an Australian employment lawyer stating that the Chevron form “would breach several discrimination and privacy laws”. The lawyer asked if “the information that is being asked reasonable to the employee carrying out their job?”.

Legal Requirements

New Zealand law is very similar.  Prospective employers should only ask applicants lawful questions that are relevant to the job.

The three key pieces of legislation to consider are:

  • Employment Relations Act 2000;
  • Human Rights Act 1993; and
  • Privacy Act 1993.

The Human Rights Act 1993 applies to job applicants.  Both the Employment Relations Act and the Human Rights Act set out a long list of 11 prohibited grounds of discrimination.  This list includes:

  • Sex (which itself includes pregnancy and childbirth);
  • Disability (which includes the presence in the body of organisms capable of causing illness);
  • Age; and
  • Family status (which includes having the responsibility for the care of children).

It is not only unlawful to discriminate on the basis of one of the 11 grounds, but it is also unlawful to ask questions that would indicate an intention to discriminate.  By asking a question an employer is indicating that it is going do something with the information.  It might appear to an applicant that the employer is asking the question with the intention of not employing him or her depending on what his or her answer is.

The Privacy Act prohibits personal information from being collected by an employer unless the information is collected for a lawful purpose connected with a function or activity of the employer and the collection of the information is necessary for that purpose.  In other words, an employer is not allowed to collect personal information unless it actually needs it to make a recruitment decision.

Top Tip for Employers

When drafting an application form it is useful to keep in mind the following questions:

  • Is this question relevant to the role or job?
  • Do I need to know the answer to this question?
  • Is this question lawful?

These questions all need to be considered in relation to the actual job functions of the particular job.  As an example, lifting may be critical for a packing role but not for an administration role.  As a consequence, an application form that asked a lifting question may be satisfactory for one role but considered discriminatory for the other.  Where an employer has a range of functions across different roles, a general application form will be of limited value, and role specific application questions may be required.

As an end note, it seems that Chevron Australia took advice following the outcry in the media.  Fairfax Media subsequently reported that Chevron Australia had withdrawn its application form to amend it to ask only medical information relevant to the position.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

UK Court of Appeal rules that that courts can order parties to engage in ADR: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416
The England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) has held that in certain circumstances, the courts can order parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or stay proceedings to allow the par...
24.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Health and Safety Tiles
Updated Guidance: IOD and WorkSafe release ‘Health and Safety Governance – A Good Practice Guide’
While we wait with bated breath for the outcome in the prosecution of former Ports of Auckland CEO, Tony Gibson, officers’ duties are very much at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Section 44 of t...
23.07.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.