04.11.2014

Once upon a time, there was a Bill…

Way way back, during the 2011 election campaign, National made a promise to amend the Employment Relations Act 2000.  Following what has proven to be a long-winded saga featuring criminal convictions, resignations, Kim Dotcom, and another election, those changes have finally passed.  Whew!

During the last parliamentary term, in early 2013, the Government introduced the Employment Relations Amendment Bill, which we have examined in past updates The Employment Relations Act Gets a Makeover and Legislation Update.   In short, the Bill proposed changes to the duty of good faith, flexible working arrangements, rest and meal breaks, strikes and lockouts, and collective bargaining.

The Bill passed its first reading in June 2013 along ideological lines.  From that point, it was spirited off to Select Committee, which dutifully produced a report in December 2013 recommending, by majority, that the Bill pass with some amendments.  A second reading was then held, and it looked as if the Bill was on track to become law.

However, the Bill then ran into trouble in the form of an Act MP and some ‘anonymous’ donations.  John Banks’ conviction and subsequent resignation from Parliament following Kim Dotcom’s contributions to his 2010 Auckland mayoral campaign meant that the Government could not assemble enough votes to get the Bill across the line.

Sent to the sidelines, the Bill remained on the periphery during the most recent election campaign.  Unlike in 2011, changes to the Employment Relations Act were not an election issue – Dirty Politics drowned out everything else.

However, the election brought National an increased majority in Parliament.  As such, the Bill was whisked off the sidelines and straight into the starting lineup as the first piece of legislation to be considered by the new Parliament.  Having been debated by Parliament once again (including 12 further proposed amendments), the Bill moved into its third reading and was passed on 30 October, supported by National, Act and United Future and opposed by Labour, the Greens, NZ First and the Maori Party.

So what next for the Bill?  It will soon go to the Governor General to receive the Royal assent.  Once that happens, it will take effect four months later – so, in reality, the changes to the Employment Relations Act are likely to kick in in March/April next year.

While the changes to rest and meal breaks seem to have received all the attention this time, there are other significant changes, including to collective bargaining.  If you would like further information, check out our earlier articles (links above) or feel free to give us a call.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

UK Court of Appeal rules that that courts can order parties to engage in ADR: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416
The England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) has held that in certain circumstances, the courts can order parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or stay proceedings to allow the par...
24.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Health and Safety Tiles
Updated Guidance: IOD and WorkSafe release ‘Health and Safety Governance – A Good Practice Guide’
While we wait with bated breath for the outcome in the prosecution of former Ports of Auckland CEO, Tony Gibson, officers’ duties are very much at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Section 44 of t...
23.07.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.