26.10.2012

Public Sector Changes – Protection, Control and Redundancy

The State Sector and Public Finance Reform Bill was introduced to Parliament in late August, and is currently awaiting its first reading.

The government has introduced a Bill to change aspects of employment law for public sector employees.  Some commentators have remarked that the Bill ‘sets off the snooze button’, while others believe it makes significant changes.  While not necessarily a particularly exciting topic, the Bill does seek to implement several changes that public sector employers and employees should be aware of.

The State Sector and Public Finance Reform Bill was introduced to Parliament in late August, and is currently awaiting its first reading.  The Bill, if passed, will amend the State Sector Act 1988, the Public Finance Act 1989, and the Crown Entities Act 2004.  Essentially, the Bill fits in with the government’s policy of streamlining the state sector to deliver better public services by making it easier for government departments and other agencies to work together.

A portion of the Bill would amend the State Sector Act 1998, the primary piece of legislation that sets out how the state sector operates and promotes responsible management and integrity.

The proposed amendments to the State Sector Act 1988, according to the explanatory note that accompanies the Bill, would:

  • Strengthen the role of the State Service Commissioner to lead state services;
  • Extend the responsibilities of chief executives of government departments so that they must consider the collective interests of government when making a decision; and
  • Create “departmental agencies” to sit within a larger government department.  The idea behind the creation of such agencies is to reduce fragmentation in state services and absorb functions carried out by separate agencies.

Although not one of the more public changes, the Bill also proposes to clarify the immunity that public service chief executives and employees have from civil proceedings, provided that their actions (or omissions) were in good faith and occurred while they were pursuing their duties, functions, or powers.  In practice, this will be one of the more important amendments to public sector employees, as the relationship between this immunity and the Crown Proceedings Act 1950 had become somewhat complex following the decision of the Supreme Court in Couch v Attorney General.

The Bill introduces the term “key position” to the State Sector Act 1988.  Should the Bill pass, then the State Services Commissioner would have the power to designate a position as a key position.  This would be done on the basis that the position is critical to the public service, or, alternatively, because of the position’s potential to develop senior leaders in the state sector.  If a position is designated a “key position”, then employees can only be appointed to that position with the agreement of the State Services Commissioner.

The Bill also introduces the concept of “ministerial staff” to the State Sector Act 1988.  Ministerial staff are defined as employees (this includes acting, temporary, or casual employees) of a government department who are employed on events-based employment agreements to work directly for a Minister, as opposed to for a department.  If a particular event occurs, the employment of these employees can be terminated.  An example in the Bill of an event giving rise to termination is where the particular Minister no longer holds that particular ministerial portfolio.  In essence, ministerial staff would be fixed-term employees.

The Bill also proposes to make changes to provisions relating to redundancy payments where an employee is offered another position within the state sector.  At present, the State Sector Act 1988 gives chief executives certain powers to transfer employees within or between departments (subject, of course, to the terms of the employee’s employment agreement) where they are surplus to requirements, provided that:

  • The chief executive consults with the affected employee before any transfer appointment is made; and
  • The employee is not subject to conditions of employment any less favourable than their old position.

Many state sector employment agreements provide for redundancy compensation when such a transfer occurs.  Under the proposed amendments in the Bill, an employee will no longer be entitled to a redundancy payment where, before their employment has ended, they:

  • Are offered and accepts another position in the state sector (which includes government departments, Crown entities, and Crown companies); or
  • Are offered an alternative position in the state sector with comparable duties and responsibilities to their current position, the alternative position is in the same general locality (or within reasonable commuting distance), and on terms and conditions of employment no less favourable overall, and is treated as if it were continuous service.

If you have any questions regarding these issues email us on employmentnews@heskethhenry.co.nz or call us on (09) 375 8699.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Deciding to Wind Up? Observations on winding-up a trust from a recent High Court case
A trust can be a hassle and expensive to maintain.  So, it is not unusual for clients to reflect on whether a trust should be maintained. When settlors, Bert and Diana Queenin, decided to wind up the...
24.03.2025 Posted in Private Wealth
Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Mediation
Navigating the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction can be tricky. This article aims to spell out the key considerations for those involved in or contemplating mediation, which is...
24.03.2025 Posted in Employment
empty wallet finance concept
Amendment to the Crimes Act 1961: Intentionally not paying employees their wages now deemed theft
An amendment to the Crimes Act 1961 (Crimes Act) – the Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill has been passed by Parliament and received Royal assent. It is now an enforceable provision of th...
14.03.2025 Posted in Employment
Time’s Up: Late Redelivery and the Assessment of Damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company
The English Commercial Court gave an instructive judgment on the assessment of damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company; an appeal brou...
11.03.2025 Posted in Trade and Transport
Team Hands in small
Cartel conduct: Do not pass “GO”, go directly to jail
Until 8 April 2021, cartel conduct was punishable only by civil penalty in New Zealand.  In R v Kumar [2024] NZHC 3955 the High Court imposed the first criminal convictions and sentences for cartel c...
06.03.2025 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Employment
2025 Insights: Proposed Legislative Changes and Employment Team Update
Team update and proposed legislative change – hello from the Hesketh Henry Employment Law Team 2025. Click here
20.02.2025
photo  dbe
When Sweet Turns Sour: The Costly Consequences of Contamination
The New Zealand Sugar Company (NZSC), trading as Chelsea Sugar, recently found itself in hot water after being fined nearly $149,500 by the District Court due to a prosecution brought by the Ministry ...
19.02.2025 Posted in Insurance & Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.