26.03.2024

Income is classified as relationship property – surprised?

For all couples, embarking on the journey of building a life together involves not only love and commitment but also financial considerations.  As you navigate through shared finances, it’s important to understand the legal framework surrounding income and assets, particularly in the context of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (Act).

The Act sets out the law relating to the division of property and assets in the event of a relationship ending, whether by separation or death.  The Act applies to married couples, civil union partners, and de facto couples who have been together for more than three years.  

Inheritance and assets acquired prior to the relationship and kept separate are usually classed as separate property.  The family home and assets acquired during the relationship through income sources are usually classed as relationship property.

What is often surprising for couples is that income earned during a relationship is generally considered relationship property, regardless of which partner has earned it. This means that both partners are entitled to a share of the income acquired by either party during the relationship and any assets purchased with that income during the relationship.  However, income earned from property acquired prior to the relationship and kept separate, will remain that partner’s separate property.

One of the fundamental principles of the Act is the equal sharing principle. This principle dictates that relationship property should be divided equally between the partners unless there are certain circumstances that justify an unequal division. So, regardless of differences in income, both partners are entitled to an equal share of the assets acquired during the relationship.

While the equal sharing principle is the default, under the Act, couples do have the option to enter into contracting out agreements, commonly known as prenuptial agreements or section 21 agreements.  Such an agreement sets out how property will be divided in the event of a separation so it is clear for each partner what property will be separate property and what will be relationship property and split equally.

Navigating these issues can be tricky!  Here are some practical steps for couples regarding finances:

  1. Open Communication: Discuss your financial goals, expectations, and concerns openly with your partner.  Establishing clear communication around finances can help avoid misunderstandings in the future.
  2. Seek Legal Advice: Consult with a lawyer to understand your rights and obligations under the Act.  A lawyer can provide personalised advice based on your circumstances and help you navigate through complex legal matters.
  3. Keep Records: Maintain records of financial transactions, property acquisitions, and contributions made by both partners throughout the relationship. Having documented evidence can streamline the process of property division in the event of a separation.
  4. Plan for the Future: Consider entering into a contracting out agreement to define how assets will be divided if the relationship ends. While it may seem daunting, having a clear plan in place can provide peace of mind and protect both partners’ interests.

Navigating income and the Act requires careful consideration and proactive planning for couples. If you would like to discuss your relationship property matters, please speak with one of our Private Wealth experts at Hesketh Henry.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

 

Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Employment Relations Authority and Employment Court
In our last article, we introduced the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction by discussing mediation – specifically, what mediation is and what to expect. This article discusses ...
17.04.2025 Posted in Employment
You’ve Been Served: Navigating the Use of Statutory Demands
An Introduction to Statutory Demands: A statutory demand is a legal document that is issued by a creditor (Creditor) to a debtor company (Debtor) demanding payment of a debt that is due and owing.  T...
15.04.2025 Posted in Insolvency and Restructuring
iStock  Succession Plan medium
Passing the Torch: Priming your Family Business for a Succession
As the first in a series of articles looking at the generational wealth transition and its impacts on business succession in New Zealand, Ben Hickson (partner, Corporate & Commercial) and John Kir...
07.04.2025 Posted in Corporate & Commercial & Private Wealth
Deciding to Wind Up? Observations on winding-up a trust from a recent High Court case
A trust can be a hassle and expensive to maintain.  So, it is not unusual for clients to reflect on whether a trust should be maintained. When settlors, Bert and Diana Queenin, decided to wind up the...
24.03.2025 Posted in Private Wealth
Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Mediation
Navigating the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction can be tricky. This article aims to spell out the key considerations for those involved in or contemplating mediation, which is...
24.03.2025 Posted in Employment
empty wallet finance concept
Amendment to the Crimes Act 1961: Intentionally not paying employees their wages now deemed theft
An amendment to the Crimes Act 1961 (Crimes Act) – the Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill has been passed by Parliament and received Royal assent. It is now an enforceable provision of th...
14.03.2025 Posted in Employment
Time’s Up: Late Redelivery and the Assessment of Damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company
The English Commercial Court gave an instructive judgment on the assessment of damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company; an appeal brou...
11.03.2025 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.