02.12.2014

Suspension – Not as straightforward as you may think

Suspending an employee is not as straightforward as many employers may think. In this article, we guide you through the legalities in New Zealand.

What is a Suspension?

We commonly think of a suspension as sending an employee home from work.  Directing an employee to remain away from the workplace for a period of time is one type of suspension, but directing an employee to not perform some or all of their duties can be an alternative form of suspension.

A Right and a Reason

To suspend an employee, an employer needs to have a right and a reason to propose a suspension.

The right to suspend an employee can be a contractual term in the employee’s employment agreement or a statutory right to suspend, for example during a strike.  Only in very limited circumstances can an employer lawfully suspend an employee without a contractual or statutory right to do so.

In addition to the right, an employer needs a reason to suspend an employee.  Possible reasons include allegations of serious misconduct where the employee’s presence in the workplace could compromise the investigation, or cause further problems (e.g. where the allegations involve violence or harassment) or for health and safety reasons.  However, the mere fact that there are allegations of serious misconduct does not justify a suspension.  The suspension requires its own reasons such as to avoid the employee compromising the investigation if there is a reasonable likelihood of that occurring.

If the employment agreement or a company policy details situations in which a suspension can occur, the employer must comply with the contractual term or policy as well.

The Process

If an employer has the right and a reason to suspend, a procedurally fair process must also be followed.  A lawful decision to suspend cannot be predetermined and must follow consultation with the employee.  Once again, if the employment agreement or a policy details a process, it should be followed to avoid a breach.

The allegations or concerns (usually something that may amount to serious misconduct) should be put to the employee together with the employer’s proposal to suspend the employee and the reasons for that suspension.  The employee should then be given a reasonable opportunity to respond to the employer’s proposal of suspension.  Discussion of the proposal should include whether or not the suspension should occur, alternatives to suspension, the proposed length, the possible implications and whether the suspension would be on pay.  We note that the ability to suspend without pay is extremely limited.  The employer must genuinely consider the employee’s response (if any) before a decision is made on whether to suspend the employee or not, and if so, on what basis.

As a suspension would have an impact on the employee’s employment, an employee should be advised of the employee’s right to take legal advice and have a legal representative or support person present at any meetings.

Final Points

The courts have held a suspension of an employee to be a drastic measure which almost always will have a devastating effect on the employee concerned, and some cases have noted that it is rare for an employee to return from a suspension.  Therefore, as with any other action that may affect an employee’s employment, the legal test is whether the employer’s actions, and how the employer acted, were what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances at the time the suspension occurred.

If an employer breaches its legal obligations with regard to a suspension it could give rise to a breach of contract (or policy), breach of statute or the employee could raise a personal grievance for unjustified disadvantage.  All these situations could result in a remedy being awarded to the employee.

If you are thinking of suspending an employee, or your own suspension is proposed, the Hesketh Henry Employment Team is happy to assist.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Deciding to Wind Up? Observations on winding-up a trust from a recent High Court case
A trust can be a hassle and expensive to maintain.  So, it is not unusual for clients to reflect on whether a trust should be maintained. When settlors, Bert and Diana Queenin, decided to wind up the...
24.03.2025 Posted in Private Wealth
Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Mediation
Navigating the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction can be tricky. This article aims to spell out the key considerations for those involved in or contemplating mediation, which is...
24.03.2025 Posted in Employment
empty wallet finance concept
Amendment to the Crimes Act 1961: Intentionally not paying employees their wages now deemed theft
An amendment to the Crimes Act 1961 (Crimes Act) – the Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill has been passed by Parliament and received Royal assent. It is now an enforceable provision of th...
14.03.2025 Posted in Employment
Time’s Up: Late Redelivery and the Assessment of Damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company
The English Commercial Court gave an instructive judgment on the assessment of damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company; an appeal brou...
11.03.2025 Posted in Trade and Transport
Team Hands in small
Cartel conduct: Do not pass “GO”, go directly to jail
Until 8 April 2021, cartel conduct was punishable only by civil penalty in New Zealand.  In R v Kumar [2024] NZHC 3955 the High Court imposed the first criminal convictions and sentences for cartel c...
06.03.2025 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Employment
2025 Insights: Proposed Legislative Changes and Employment Team Update
Team update and proposed legislative change – hello from the Hesketh Henry Employment Law Team 2025. Click here
20.02.2025
photo  dbe
When Sweet Turns Sour: The Costly Consequences of Contamination
The New Zealand Sugar Company (NZSC), trading as Chelsea Sugar, recently found itself in hot water after being fined nearly $149,500 by the District Court due to a prosecution brought by the Ministry ...
19.02.2025 Posted in Insurance & Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.