16.04.2020

Trustee Meetings Key: Duty on Trustees under the Trusts Act to consider exercising their powers

The Trusts Act 2019 ("Act") comes into force on 30 January 2021 and with it comes the partial codification of trustee duties.

The Act contains five mandatory duties, which cannot be excluded or modified by the trust deed, and ten default duties that apply unless expressly excluded or modified by the trust deed. 

The mandatory and default duties will apply to existing trusts and any new trusts.

A trust is a fiduciary relationship in which the trustees hold and manage property for the benefit of the beneficiaries.  It is only right that with the trustees’ role comes a host of responsibilities – duties.

One of the default trustee duties (under s32 of the Act) is to consider actively and regularly whether the trustee should be exercising 1 or more of the trustee’s powers

This requirement of trustees is not new, but it is now expressed in a very clear and succinct terms.

There is no particular guidance in the Act on how trustees should discharge this duty, but there is an existing body of common law which provides that trustees should:

  • Consider from time to time the management of the trust and whether and how the trustees should be making distributions.
  • Each actively consider their decisions as trustee and put forward their thoughts, not being swayed by the settlor’s wishes or passively going along with the suggestions of other trustees.
  • Be aware of their specific powers and only make decisions where they have a power to do so.
  • Ensure they are informed about all the relevant circumstances when considering making distributions from the trust fund and not take into account irrelevant considerations.

In practical terms, the best way to ensure that trustees are meeting their obligations is for them to have regular trustee meetings.  These meetings need to be held with some formality for both decision-making and record-keeping purposes.  They also need to be open discussions where the trustees really consider the trust investments, the needs of the beneficiaries and what the path ahead for the trust should be.

There should be an agenda to ensure that there is a framework for ongoing issues to be discussed and new issues to be raised.  Trustees must keep written minutes of their meetings, which should be then signed by all trustees.  These minutes should then be kept with the core trust documents in accordance with the Act. 

Trustees, lawyers and accountants should all be reviewing at their meeting agendas and minutes to see whether they support this new approach, and should consider including “review of trust assets and liabilities”, “beneficiary communication” and “update on beneficiaries” as a standard “segments” for trustee meetings.  This will help focus trustees and also provide a record to show consideration is being actively and regularly given on a regular basis to the trust management. 

This is particularly important for trusts which do not have an independent trustee as these trusts can often suffer from a lack of record-keeping for decisions. 

It is also important for the large number of trusts in New Zealand which are not income producing (as they possibly only hold the family home as an asset).  It is not uncommon for trustees to meet and review the trust management only when transactions are occurring for these trusts.  As transactions can be infrequent, many trustees are not considering the exercise of their powers on a regular basis.  The trustees of those trusts need to have a fresh think about how they approach their obligations as an ad-hoc approach to management will not be sufficient going forwards.

While this default duty can be deleted or modified by the trust deed, we think that this duty remains fundamental to the carrying out of a trustee’s duty and should not be modified, unless the unusual nature of the trust assets and purpose mean that regular review is redundant.

Any modification must ensure it does not limit another of the trustees’ duty: to consider at reasonable intervals whether the trustee should be making the basic trust information available to beneficiaries. 

Hesketh Henry has been helping clients prepare for the changes in practice that will be brought about by the Act for some time. If you have any questions about whether your trust deed is fit for purpose going forward, or how to meet you trustee obligations, feel free to get in touch with our Private Wealth team.

 

 

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

UK Court of Appeal rules that that courts can order parties to engage in ADR: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416
The England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) has held that in certain circumstances, the courts can order parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or stay proceedings to allow the par...
24.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Health and Safety Tiles
Updated Guidance: IOD and WorkSafe release ‘Health and Safety Governance – A Good Practice Guide’
While we wait with bated breath for the outcome in the prosecution of former Ports of Auckland CEO, Tony Gibson, officers’ duties are very much at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Section 44 of t...
23.07.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.