15.04.2021

What happens if my employee refuses to get the COVID-19 vaccination?

While there are enough COVID-19 vaccinations to inoculate each New Zealander, it has been reported that some ‘frontline’ workers have refused to get vaccinated, or have failed to attend vaccination appointments.  Once the COVID-19 vaccination becomes available to the general public, it is likely that there will be more instances of this.  This has raised challenging questions about the rights and obligations of employees and employers in these circumstances.

Under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 a person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) must ensure the health and safety of workers and eliminate risks to health and safety, so far as reasonably practicable.  If it is not reasonably practicable to eliminate risks to health and safety, then the PCBU must minimise those risks so far as is reasonably practicable.  COVID-19 is a foreseeable risk to health and safety of workers and others in the workplace.

For some front-line roles (including workers in Managed Isolation and Quarantine facilities), the Government has set a deadline for all staff to be vaccinated, before non-vaccinated staff must be moved to non-frontline roles. 

In many non-frontline workplaces the risk of spreading COVID-19 can be managed in the same way that it has been managed before the vaccine became available – by employees following the Government-mandated protocols for each alert level.  In these workplaces, wearing PPE, hand washing, physical distancing, encouraging (or directing) sick employees to stay home, and working from home when required, have proven to be reasonably successful in mitigating this risk so far.  If anyone does have cold or flu-like symptoms the Government strongly encourages that person to get tested and stay home until he or she receives a negative test result.  There are also a myriad of government benefits available, which we have summarised here.

However, if the employee works on the frontline and/or with vulnerable people, say in a rest home or in a hospital, then, arguably, one of the ways to eliminate, or certainly significantly reduce the risk of COVID-19 infecting others, is for the employees to be vaccinated.  The risk becomes much higher when there is community transmission. 

If there is COVID-19 in the community (which can happen suddenly and spread quickly) and an employee has failed or refused to get vaccinated, an employer must take certain steps before taking any action against an employee that may adversely affect his or her employment.  Such action could include dismissal (presumably as a last resort), suspension (depending on the presence and drafting of the suspension clause) warnings, or changing an employee’s duties, workplace, or location of work.  As always, how and what action the employer takes will need to stand up to the test of justification i.e. whether the employer’s actions, and how the employer acted, were what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances at the time the dismissal or action occurred.

First and foremost an employer should understand why the employee is refusing or failing to get vaccinated, as he or she may have a good reason this. For example, the employee may have a medical condition or have certain religious beliefs.  

An employer should then explore all alternatives before taking any action against the employee. For example, it might be possible for the employee to wear additional PPE, or do other work when there is community transmission. 

The lawfulness of the employer’s actions will be assessed in light of all the circumstances at the time the employer takes the action.  This will include, at a minimum: an assessment of the actual risk, at that time, of infection/transmission, the potential consequences of infection/transmission, the various means available for reducing the risk on infection/transmission in those particular circumstances and the efficacy of those alternative means, the employee’s reasons for failing or refusing to have the vaccination, and any relevant contractual provisions. 

In many ways, the issues related to COVID-19 vaccinations in the workplace are similar to those in relation to drug testing employees, particularly those employees who work in safety sensitive roles such as in forestry, manufacturing, and construction.  How an employer approaches these issues may help it in its considerations of approaching potential issues about the COVID-19 vaccination.  For instance, it is likely to be reasonable to drug test an employee who is working in a safety sensitive area.  It is less likely – although not impossible – to be considered reasonable to drug test an employee who is working in an office.  The area the employee works in and the associated risks will also be relevant in the context of COVID-19 vaccinations. 

If an employee refuses to be drug tested, as with an employee refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccination, then an employer will need to investigate this before taking any action.  If the employee does not have good cause, this may result in the employer taking disciplinary action against the employee. 

As employers should do for drug testing, we also suggest that a comprehensive clause in the employment agreement and policies about the COVID-19 vaccination will give employers stronger footing in these circumstances.  A vaccination policy or clause should set out when, how, who, costs, information etc.  If you wish to introduce a policy you will need to check your employment agreements to make sure it doesn’t contradict any agreed terms in these and consult with employees before implementing.  Case law relating to drug testing employees indicates the greater the policy’s impact on the employee, the more thorough the consultation will need to be.

While we have not seen these fact scenarios tested in the Authority or Court, we consider it will only be in very limited circumstances that an employer could take justifiable disciplinary action against an employee who refuses to get vaccinated.  This means, in most workplaces, the best approach will be one where an employer encourages employees to get the vaccination and provides them with access to information and support.  Should an employer sense any reluctance from an employee, again, it is better to talk through this with an employee. If an employer can make it easy and positive for employees, then employees are much more likely to agree to the vaccination.

As the COVID-19 vaccination and its related issues is uncharted territory for employers, we strongly suggest employers seek advice if an issue arises in this area.

If you have any questions about the COVID-19 vaccination in your workplace contact the Employment Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Clarity on Liquidated Damages following Termination
The United Kingdom Supreme Court in Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd [2021] UKSC 29 has clarified the operation of liquidated damages clauses in the event of termination.  The dec...
Is your will in draft form?  High Court refuses to exercise its discretionary power to validate a draft will notwithstanding beneficiaries’ consent
The High Court’s recent decision in Re: An application to validate the will of Olive Ruby Piper [2021] NZHC 534 serves as a valuable reminder to make sure that your estate planning documents are...
16.09.2021 Posted in Family & Trust Wills Estates
New Fair Trading Act provisions spark need to review small trade contracts
The Fair Trading Amendment Bill received Royal Assent on 16 August 2021 and is now the Fair Trading Amendment Act 2021 (Amendment Act).  The Amendment Act amends the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA), with...
Employment Relations Authority Finds Dismissal of Unvaccinated Border Worker to be Justified
On 1 September 2021, The Employment Relations Authority (Authority) determined in GF v New Zealand Customs Service [2021] NZERA 382, that the New Zealand Customs Service (Customs) was justified in its...
10.09.2021 Posted in Business Advice & COVID-19 & Employment
AML/CFT guidance with the High Court’s decision in Reserve Bank of New Zealand and TSB Bank Limited
On 31 August 2021, the High Court of Wellington released its decision on the Reserve Bank of New Zealand v TSB Bank Limited.
09.09.2021 Posted in AML/CFT & Banking and Finance
Supreme Court asserts Employment Relations Authority exclusive jurisdiction
The Supreme Court has recently issued a significant judgment clarifying that the Employment Relations Authority (Authority) has exclusive jurisdiction over claims arising in a “work context”. In d...
09.09.2021 Posted in Business Advice & Employment
How much does one truly deserve?
A critical analysis of the New Zealand and Australian High Courts' approach to quantum meruit claims within the construction industry
06.09.2021 Posted in Construction & Regulatory
Send us an enquiry
For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
-->