05.06.2014

New Workplace Health and Safety Legislation

As you might be aware, the Government is in the process of introducing new workplace health and safety legislation. The Health and Safety Reform Bill is currently before Select Committee, and is expected to become law in April 2015.

While that process is playing out, the Government has released a discussion document outlining proposals for the first tranche of regulations to accompany the new Act: http://www.mbie.govt.nz/about-us/consultation/development-of-regulations-to-support-the-new-health-and-safety-at-work-act

The proposals cover five key areas (listed below, along with an example of something proposed in that area to give an indication of what the regulations will be about):

  • General risk and workplace management (example: whether the regulations should contain a prescribed risk management process that would be mandatory in specified high-risk situations)
  • Worker participation, engagement and representation (example: imposing obligations on persons conducting a business or undertaking (basically everyone) to spend more on sending health and safety representatives on training courses and paying for their fees in doing so)
  • Work involving asbestos (example: prohibiting all work activities involving asbestos unless those activities comply strictly with the regulations)
  • Work involving hazardous substances (example: requiring an inventory of all hazardous substances used, handled, or stored in the workplace be prepared and maintained/introducing requirements for establishing health monitoring (to be paid for by the business) and storage of monitoring results); and
  • Major hazard facilities (example: making it a mandatory requirement that operators notify WorkSafe NZ if hazardous substances are present or are likely to be present once a certain quantity/threshold is reached).

While it is the Act that will get all the attention, the regulations are key: they support and provide guidance on how best to comply with the Act.  As a major example, the regulations will set out what responsibilities duty holders (basically everyone who has the ability to make decisions in a business) have, how they can comply with these duties, and whether they have done enough to comply with them.  If something were to go wrong, this information will help WorkSafe NZ decide whether the Act has been breached and a prosecution commenced.

The areas listed above are likely to impact on your business. The regulations will have a significant impact on employers and this is a chance for you to have some input.

Submissions on the discussion document are due by Friday, 18 July 2014.  Now is the time for you to submit feedback that could influence how the regulations are formulated (and thus how the regulations and the Act impact upon their business). We recommend that you consider making a submission. We are more than happy to assist with form and process.

If you would like to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to contact me,  Jim Roberts (09 3758723 jim.roberts@heskethhenry.co.nz ), or Alison Maelzer (09 375 7628 alison.maelzer@heskethhenry.co.nz).

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

UK Court of Appeal rules that that courts can order parties to engage in ADR: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416
The England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) has held that in certain circumstances, the courts can order parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or stay proceedings to allow the par...
24.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Health and Safety Tiles
Updated Guidance: IOD and WorkSafe release ‘Health and Safety Governance – A Good Practice Guide’
While we wait with bated breath for the outcome in the prosecution of former Ports of Auckland CEO, Tony Gibson, officers’ duties are very much at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Section 44 of t...
23.07.2024 Posted in Employment & Health & Safety
Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.