29.05.2023

Companies (Directors Duties) Amendment Bill – Recap and Update

A bill proposing to expressly include ESG factors in the context of a director’s exercise of corporate power has recently failed to obtain Select Committee support.  Hesketh Henry’s Business Advice team takes a look at the controversial bill and its recent legislative history.

As environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations continue to receive increased attention from organisations around the world, these considerations came into sharper focus from a NZ legislative perspective in 2021 when MP Duncan Webb introduced a bill which proposed to amend well established legislation regarding directors duties in New Zealand.

The bill focussed on section 131 of the Companies Act 1993.  Section 131 provides that when exercising powers or performing their duties, the director of a company must act in good faith and in what they believe are the best interests of the company.  The bill proposed to add the following subsection 5: 

(5) To avoid doubt, a director of a company may, when determining the best interests of the company, take into account recognised environmental, social and governance factors, such as: 

(a) recognising the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti o Waitangi):

(b) reducing adverse environmental impacts:

(c) upholding high standards of ethical behaviour:

(d) following fair and equitable employment practices:

(e) recognising the interests of the wider community. 

The policy statement to the bill outlined that its aim was to make clear that a director, in acting as the mind and will of the company, can take actions which take into account wider matters than the financial bottom-line. 

In early May 2023, the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee released its report on the bill.  The report noted that the Committee was unable to agree that the bill should pass, but recommended amendments to the bill, if it were to proceed any further.  The Committee also noted that the new subsection 5 could be shortened and still achieve its intended effect, per the following wording:

(5) To avoid doubt, in considering the best interests of a company or holding company for the purposes of this section, a director may consider matters other than the maximisation of profit.

Key concerns raised by the Committee about the bill were:

  • The bill as introduced could have unintended consequences insofar that it may confuse directors and give the impression that these ESG factors should be given more weight than others.
  • Reference to Te Tiriti o Waitangi could be an additional source of confusion because the relationship between the Crown and Māori is governed by Te Tiriti and this relationship does not typically include other individuals or private entities.
  • Its introduction could create inconsistencies within the Companies Act and with other legislation insofar that if this subsection was included in section 131 and not in other areas of the Companies Act, or in other laws (such as the Incorporated Societies Act 2022), there could be confusion as to how they are to be interpreted or why they are not framed in a similar way.

The bill has also been criticised by other commentators for its reference to ‘recognised’ in the phrase ‘recognised environmental, social and governance factors’ – without giving any clarification on what those recognised factors are.  Other commentators have also pointed out that a prudent director would already be considering ESG related matters (for example, the extent to which adverse environmental impacts may result from a corporate decision) and therefore the bill does not add meaningfully to the legislation.

Our team will be following further developments in this area. 

If you would like further information about any of the matters discussed in this article, or how it may affect your business, please get in touch with our Business Advice team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

HH Pg  Forrest uncropped
ETS Update: Climate Change Commission recommends minor tweaks to ETS Settings
Last month, He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission (the Commission) released its annual advice to the Government on the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) settings for the period 2026 to 2030 (Advice)....
HS Scrabble Med Crop Vignette
Health and safety learnings for landowners following latest Whakaari decision
The leasing and subleasing of land, buildings and infrastructure is commonplace in New Zealand business and commerce, but what happens when something goes wrong? Do landowners have health and safety o...
08.05.2025 Posted in Health & Safety
Navigating Settlor Intentions in Trust Restructures – Legler v Formannoij [2024] NZSC 173
In Legler v Formannoij the surviving widow Marina Formannoij, was forced to navigate the complexities of two trusts that were part of her late husband Ricco Legler’s estate plan: the Kaahu Trust (wh...
08.05.2025 Posted in Private Wealth
Counting Costs in Arbitration: High Court Affirms Arbitrator’s Discretion on Costs Awards
Construction contracts often require parties to finally resolve disputes through arbitration rather than Court litigation.  One important difference between arbitration and the Courts is that arbitra...
07.05.2025 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Employment Relations Authority and Employment Court
In our last article, we introduced the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction by discussing mediation – specifically, what mediation is and what to expect. This article discusses ...
17.04.2025 Posted in Employment
You’ve Been Served: Navigating the Use of Statutory Demands
An Introduction to Statutory Demands: A statutory demand is a legal document that is issued by a creditor (Creditor) to a debtor company (Debtor) demanding payment of a debt that is due and owing.  T...
15.04.2025 Posted in Insolvency and Restructuring
iStock  Succession Plan medium
Passing the Torch: Priming your Family Business for a Succession
As the first in a series of articles looking at the generational wealth transition and its impacts on business succession in New Zealand, Ben Hickson (partner, Corporate & Commercial) and John Kir...
07.04.2025 Posted in Corporate & Commercial & Private Wealth
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.