21.09.2022

Russia, Sanctions, and Force Majeure: MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd

It is common for force majeure clauses to define a “force majeure event” as being one that cannot reasonably be prevented by the parties. The wording may differ among clauses, but the requirement that there be no “reasonable” avoidance of the force majeure event for it to be triggered, is a frequent feature.

MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd [2022] EWHC 467 (Comm) clarifies that what is deemed “reasonable” in respect of overcoming / avoiding a force majeure event does not include an obligation to accept non-contractual performance or a variation to the terms of the contract.

The Decision

The case concerned a Contract of Affreightment (COA) for cargo transported between Guinea and Ukraine. The imposition of US sanctions on RTI Ltd’s (Charterers) parent company restricted its ability to pay MUR Shipping BV (Owners) in US dollars, which was the contractually specified currency for freight.

The Owners invoked the force majeure clause in the COA on the basis it could not be expected to perform without payment under the terms of the COA.

The clause excused performance only where the preventative event was outside of the affected party’s control and could not be overcome by “reasonable endeavours”.

The Charterers argued that force majeure did not apply, as the event could be reasonably overcome by accepting the Charterers’ offer to pay in Euros (including compensation for any additional costs caused by the change in currency).

The English Commercial Court held in favour of the Owners.  It found that the exercise of “reasonable endeavours” is directed at a situation in which the force majeure event can be surmounted in order for the contract to be performed.  It does not extend to varying the terms of the contract to sidestep the force majeure event.

This interpretation is equally applicable to New Zealand parties facing compliance issues because of sanctions, particularly as reliance (or attempted reliance) on force majeure clauses has become increasingly common in the current economic and political climate.   

If you have any questions about force majeure or contracts of affreightment, please get in touch with our Trade & Transport Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

 

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Deciding to Wind Up? Observations on winding-up a trust from a recent High Court case
A trust can be a hassle and expensive to maintain.  So, it is not unusual for clients to reflect on whether a trust should be maintained. When settlors, Bert and Diana Queenin, decided to wind up the...
24.03.2025 Posted in Private Wealth
Mediation wide BW
Employment Law’s Dispute Resolution Process – Mediation
Navigating the dispute resolution process in the employment jurisdiction can be tricky. This article aims to spell out the key considerations for those involved in or contemplating mediation, which is...
24.03.2025 Posted in Employment
empty wallet finance concept
Amendment to the Crimes Act 1961: Intentionally not paying employees their wages now deemed theft
An amendment to the Crimes Act 1961 (Crimes Act) – the Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill has been passed by Parliament and received Royal assent. It is now an enforceable provision of th...
14.03.2025 Posted in Employment
Time’s Up: Late Redelivery and the Assessment of Damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company
The English Commercial Court gave an instructive judgment on the assessment of damages in Hapag Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Hapag Lloyd AG v Agios Minas Shipping Company; an appeal brou...
11.03.2025 Posted in Trade and Transport
Team Hands in small
Cartel conduct: Do not pass “GO”, go directly to jail
Until 8 April 2021, cartel conduct was punishable only by civil penalty in New Zealand.  In R v Kumar [2024] NZHC 3955 the High Court imposed the first criminal convictions and sentences for cartel c...
06.03.2025 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Employment
2025 Insights: Proposed Legislative Changes and Employment Team Update
Team update and proposed legislative change – hello from the Hesketh Henry Employment Law Team 2025. Click here
20.02.2025
photo  dbe
When Sweet Turns Sour: The Costly Consequences of Contamination
The New Zealand Sugar Company (NZSC), trading as Chelsea Sugar, recently found itself in hot water after being fined nearly $149,500 by the District Court due to a prosecution brought by the Ministry ...
19.02.2025 Posted in Insurance & Trade and Transport
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.